Social Robotics for Autism

NCT06974240 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: CNR-IRIB-PRO-2025-003
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 20
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Socio-pragmatics focuses on the study of language in the context of social interactions. It explores how individuals use language to communicate effectively in specific social situations, taking into consideration the social, cultural and contextual factors that influence communication. Socio-pragmatics analyzes linguistic and nonlinguistic behaviors, such as gestures, facial expressions, tone of voice, and posture, to understand intended meaning, social implications, and shared communicative norms. Children with autism often present difficulties in social-pragmatic skills. The integration of advanced technologies can play a crucial role in innovative approaches to the development of this skill. In this experimental protocol, an attempt will be made to demonstrate the effectiveness of training through the use of social robots by comparing the performance of an ASD group performing a treatment using social robots with a control group performing the same in a traditional manner.

Conditions

Autism; Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

autism; social robot; social pragmatic skills; intervention; social skills; educational technologies

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 4° edizione (WISC-IV)

  Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 4° edizione (WISC-IV) is a clinical tool for assessing the cognitive abilities of children and young people between the ages of 6 years and 16 years and 11 months.

  Baseline assessment at Day 1 (prior to intervention); the test requires approximately 56-80 minutes to complete.

• Language Pragmatic Abilities (APL) -MEDEA

  The APL MEDEA is a standardized assessment tool specifically designed to evaluate socio-pragmatic skills in individuals aged 5 to 14 years. This test measures various aspects of pragmatic language skills that are essential for effective communication within social contexts. The main objective of the APL MEDEA is to assess pragmatic language skills employed during everyday interactions, including the understanding and appropriate use of language in various social situations, recognition of social cues, and effective conversational strategies. The total score ranges from 0 to 68.

  Baseline assessment at Day 1 (pre-intervention) and post-intervention assessment at 3 months (at the end of the intervention); each test session lasts approximately 30-45 minutes.

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group with social robot

EXPERIMENTAL

Ten children with ASD, aged between 8 and 13 years and with verbal IQs above 75, will be included in the trial following an assessment of their socio-pragmatic skills. They will be randomly assigned to either the control group or the experimental group. Participants in the experimental group will undergo an intervention aimed at developing and/or enhancing socio-pragmatic skills through the mediation of a social robot.

Other: Experimental Group

Control Group

OTHER

Ten children with ASD, aged between 8 and 13 years and with verbal IQs above 75, will be included in the trial following an assessment of their socio-pragmatic skills. Children in the control group will follow the same protocol of Experimental Group delivered through a therapist-led group format.

Other: control group

Interventions

Experimental Group OTHER

The training sessions were carried out following a strict order. The first phase was dedicated to improving group social skills. The beginning of the session was dedicated to greetings between participants and questions of social interest. During the second phase, videos were shown and participants answered targeted questions asked by the Nao Robot to understand if the child had correctly interpreted the general meaning of the story and to determine the degree of awareness that the expression should be understood in a non-literal sense. In the third phase, a role play was performed among the participants, which re-enacted the situations seen in the videos, involving all the members of the group in turn. During the last phase, participants were asked to share experiences in their lives in which they had used or could have used the pragmatic skill just analyzed. The protocol included 15 phases over 31 sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, twice a week.

Experimental Group with social robot

control group OTHER

The entire intervention was carried out in a group entirely mediated by an operator without the use of a social robot. The first phase is dedicated to improving group social skills. The beginning of the session was dedicated to greetings between participants and questions of social interest. During the second phase, stories were read and participants answered target questions to understand if the child had correctly interpreted the general meaning of the story and to determine the degree of awareness that the expression should be understood in a non-literal sense. In the third phase, a role play was performed among the participants, in which all members of the group participated in turn, recalling the situations seen in the videos. During the last phase, participants were asked to share experiences from their lives in which they used or could use the pragmatic skill just analyzed. The protocol included 15 phases over 31 sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, twice a week.

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 8 Years - 13 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)

You may qualify if:

• Aged between 8 and 13 years
• Clinical diagnosis of ASD according to DSM-5 criteria by a licensed child neuropsychiatrist
• Verbal and performance IQ \> 75 and total IQ \> 85, assessed with the WISC-IV
• No current aggressive behavior or severe oppositional tendencies
• No hearing, vision, or physical impairments that could interfere with participation
• Not currently taking any psychotropic medications

You may not qualify if:

• Absence of a clinical diagnosis of ASD based on DSM-5 criteria
• Verbal or performance IQ ≤ 75, or total IQ ≤ 85 as assessed by WISC-IV
• Presence of aggressive behavior or severe oppositional tendencies
• Hearing, vision, or physical impairments that could hinder participation in the intervention
• Current use of psychotropic medications

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Istituto per la Ricerca e l'Innovazione Biomedica: lead
• Messina, Italy: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Italy Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB) - National Research Council (CNR)

Messina, 98164, Italy

Location

Related Publications (3)

• Holeva V, Nikopoulou VA, Lytridis C, Bazinas C, Kechayas P, Sidiropoulos G, Papadopoulou M, Kerasidou MD, Karatsioras C, Geronikola N, Papakostas GA, Kaburlasos VG, Evangeliou A. Effectiveness of a Robot-Assisted Psychological Intervention for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Feb;54(2):577-593. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05796-5. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

  PMID: 36331688 BACKGROUND

• Taheri, A., Shariati, A., Heidari, R., Shahab, M., Alemi, M., & Meghdari, A. (2021). Impacts of using a social robot to teach music to children with low-functioning autism. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 12(1), 256-275.

  BACKGROUND

• So WC, Cheng CH, Law WW, Wong T, Lee C, Kwok FY, Lee SH, Lam KY. Robot dramas may improve joint attention of Chinese-speaking low-functioning children with autism: stepped wedge trials. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Feb;18(2):195-204. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1841836. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

  PMID: 33186058 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Autistic Disorder; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Social Skills

Interventions

Control Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Child Development Disorders, Pervasive; Neurodevelopmental Disorders; Mental Disorders; Social Behavior; Behavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research Design; Epidemiologic Methods; Investigative Techniques; Research Design; Methods

Study Officials

• Flavia Marino

  Italy Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB) - National Research Council (CNR)

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Head of Unit

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 24, 2025
• First Posted: May 15, 2025
• Study Start: January 20, 2024
• Primary Completion: October 30, 2024
• Study Completion: November 30, 2024
• Last Updated: May 15, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

IT (1)