NCT06974188

Brief Summary

It is important to identify high pregnancies early through screening so that appropriate care and intervention may be instituted. An AI-assisted risk categorisation approach may be advantageous compared with traditional means of screening. The purpose of this study is to determine if the adoption of an AI-assisted approach in general pregnancy risk screening will improve the accuracy of antenatal risk categorization into high- and low- risk pregnancy groups, ultimately resulting in fewer poor maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,700

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
10mo left

Started Aug 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress49%
Aug 2025Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2025

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 15, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

April 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Machine-learningArtificial IntelligenceAntenatal Risk StratificationSoftware as a Medical DeviceMachine Learning AlgorithmPregnancy ComplicationsNeonatal ComplicationsPregnancy outcomesObstetric complicationsAntenatal care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • The number and proportion of cases displaying any one of the following outcomes listed below (composite):

    Presented as a relative risk (RR) with 95% CI, with and without stratification for parity, ethnicity and BMI. (i) Maternal * Postpartum haemorrhage more than/equal to 1000ml or requiring blood product transfusion * Eclampsia/severe eclampsia (blood pressure SBP\>160mmHg or diastolic \>110mmHg and/or significant end-organ damage which can include signs of liver or kidney impairment, low platelet count, fluid in the lungs or new-onset headache/visual disturbances) * ICU or HDU admission (excluding those who are admitted for precautionary monitoring) * Unplanned hysterectomy * Uterine rupture (symptomatic full thickness rupture) * Venous thromboembolism proven radiologically * Maternal mortality (ii) Neonatal: * Apgar scores \<7 at 5 minutes or less than/equal to 4 at 10 minutes * Respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation or surfactant treatment * Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE, any grade) * neonatal death (within 28 days of birth)/ * intrauterine demise

    At Delivery (Birth)

  • In addition, these outcomes will be reported individually:

    Number and proportion, RR and 95% CI for each of the following: * Postpartum haemorrhage more than/equal to 1000ml or requiring blood product transfusion as well as mean difference in blood loss * Eclampsia/severe eclampsia (blood pressure SBP\>160mmHg or diastolic \>110mmHg and/or significant end-organ damage which can include signs of liver or kidney impairment, low platelet count, fluid in the lungs or new-onset headache/visual disturbances) as well as difference in gestational age of onset or diagnosis with and without adjustment for important covariates * ICU or HDU admission (excluding those who are admitted for precautionary monitoring) * Maternal mortality as well as cause of death * Respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation or surfactant treatment as well as aetiology for RDS * Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE, any grade) * Neonatal death (within 28 days of birth) * Intrauterine demise

    At Delivery (Birth)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • To test the feasibility of an AI-assisted antenatal risk stratification approach in a real-life patient-care system - Quantitative; Mean Differences

    At baseline visit (first trimester antenatal visit)

  • To test the feasibility of an AI-assisted antenatal risk stratification approach in a real-life patient-care system - Qualitative

    At baseline visit (first trimester antenatal visit)

  • To test the feasibility of an AI-assisted antenatal risk stratification approach in a real-life patient-care system - Quantitative; Number

    At baseline visit (first trimester antenatal visit)

Study Arms (2)

AI-risk stratification arm

EXPERIMENTAL

During their first trimester antenatal visit, participants will be risk stratified by clinicians with the assistance of AI. The risk prediction of 'high risk' or 'low risk' will be immediately made known to the clinician during the visit. Similarly, during the 31 -34 weeks visit following release of oral glucose tolerance test and growth scan results, participants will be risk stratified by clinicians again with the assistance of AI.

Other: AI-risk Stratification

Non-AI arm (Current Risk Stratification)

NO INTERVENTION

During their first trimester antenatal visit, participants will be risk stratified by both clinicians alone and with the assistance of AI. However, the risk prediction of 'high risk' or 'low risk' will not be disclosed to the clinician at all. It will only be revealed to the study investigators at the end of the study. Similarly, during the 31 -34 weeks visit following release of oral glucose tolerance test and growth scan results, participants will be risk stratified by clinicians again with and without the assistance of AI. However, the risk prediction of 'high risk' or 'low risk' will not be disclosed to the clinician at all. It will only be revealed to the study investigators at the end of the study. Clinicians will use their own judgement as to the risk of the participants' pregnancies. They have to adhere to the same specific 'high-risk' and 'low-risk' management protocol.

Interventions

With the results being disclosed as 'high-risk' or 'low-risk' in the experimental arm, clinicians have to adhere to a specific 'high-risk' and 'low-risk' management protocol for participants.

AI-risk stratification arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: 21 years old to 50 years old
  • Singleton Pregnancy
  • No more than 13 weeks' and 6 days' gestation at recruitment
  • Able to provide written, informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Not proficient in the English language (AI intervention is only available in English at this stage)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National University Hospital

Singapore, Singapore

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Rivera SC, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension. BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3210. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3210.

    PMID: 32907797BACKGROUND
  • Malacova E, Tippaya S, Bailey HD, Chai K, Farrant BM, Gebremedhin AT, Leonard H, Marinovich ML, Nassar N, Phatak A, Raynes-Greenow C, Regan AK, Shand AW, Shepherd CCJ, Srinivasjois R, Tessema GA, Pereira G. Stillbirth risk prediction using machine learning for a large cohort of births from Western Australia, 1980-2015. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5354. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62210-9.

    PMID: 32210300BACKGROUND
  • Jhee JH, Lee S, Park Y, Lee SE, Kim YA, Kang SW, Kwon JY, Park JT. Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 23;14(8):e0221202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221202. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31442238BACKGROUND
  • Arabi Belaghi R, Beyene J, McDonald SD. Prediction of preterm birth in nulliparous women using logistic regression and machine learning. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 30;16(6):e0252025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252025. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34191801BACKGROUND
  • Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, Sankar MJ, Blencowe H, Rizvi A, Chou VB, Walker N; Lancet Newborn Interventions Review Group; Lancet Every Newborn Study Group. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3. Epub 2014 May 19.

    PMID: 24853604BACKGROUND
  • Gosavi A, Amin Z, Carter SWD, Choolani MA, Fee EL, Milad MA, Jobe AH, Kemp MW. Antenatal corticosteroids in Singapore: a clinical and scientific assessment. Singapore Med J. 2024 Sep 1;65(9):479-487. doi: 10.4103/SINGAPOREMEDJ.SMJ-2022-014. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

    PMID: 36254928BACKGROUND
  • Hewage S, Audimulam J, Sullivan E, Chi C, Yew TW, Yoong J. Barriers to Gestational Diabetes Management and Preferred Interventions for Women With Gestational Diabetes in Singapore: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jun 30;4(6):e14486. doi: 10.2196/14486.

    PMID: 32602845BACKGROUND
  • Phibbs CM, Kozhimannil KB, Leonard SA, Lorch SA, Main EK, Schmitt SK, Phibbs CS. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Costs of Severe Maternal Morbidity. Womens Health Issues. 2022 Jul-Aug;32(4):362-368. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.12.006. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

    PMID: 35031196BACKGROUND
  • Chi C, Pang D, Aris IM, Teo WT, Li SW, Biswas A, Yong EL, Chong YS, Tan K, Kramer MS. Trends and predictors of cesarean birth in Singapore, 2005-2014: A population-based cohort study. Birth. 2018 Dec;45(4):399-408. doi: 10.1111/birt.12341. Epub 2018 Feb 17.

    PMID: 29453821BACKGROUND
  • Fink DA, Kilday D, Cao Z, Larson K, Smith A, Lipkin C, Perigard R, Marshall R, Deirmenjian T, Finke A, Tatum D, Rosenthal N. Trends in Maternal Mortality and Severe Maternal Morbidity During Delivery-Related Hospitalizations in the United States, 2008 to 2021. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317641. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17641.

    PMID: 37347486BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy Complications

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Sarah Li, MRCOG, MPH

    National University Hospital, Singapore

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Sarah Li, MRCOG, MPH

CONTACT

Harshaana Ramlal, BSc (Hons)

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study employs a two parallel arm, single-blinded, pragmatic randomised controlled trial design. In this design, pregnant women will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an AI-assisted risk categorization approach or the current manual risk stratification method.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2025

First Posted

May 15, 2025

Study Start

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 15, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations