Efficacy of Spinal Orthoses on Mobility in Older Adults With Hyperkyphosis
Efficacy of Spinal Orthoses in Functional Mobility of Older Adults With Hyperkyphosis: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study investigates whether wearing specific back braces (spinal orthoses) can improve movement and physical function in older adults (60 years and older) with hyperkyphosis, a forward curvature of the upper spine. By testing two types of braces, the study seeks to find effective ways to manage hyperkyphosis and enhance mobility, independence, and quality of life in this population. Study Purpose The purpose is to evaluate the impact of two types of thoracic spinal orthoses on functional mobility, which includes walking, muscle function, and overall physical activity. This information will help healthcare providers better understand how braces can be used to manage hyperkyphosis and improve daily functioning for older adults. Who Can Participate? The study will include adults aged 60 or older who have been diagnosed with hyperkyphosis. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups:
- Gait analysis: Evaluates walking patterns using advanced 3D motion technology.
- Muscle strength and joint function testing: Measures how well muscles and joints are working using isokinetic dynamometry.
- Muscle activity recording: Tracks how muscles respond during movement using surface electromyography (EMG).
- Physical activity monitoring: Captures activity levels using accelerometers, which are small devices that track movement. Why Is This Study Important? Hyperkyphosis can lead to challenges in daily life, such as difficulty walking, decreased balance, pain, and a higher risk of falls. While physical therapy and exercise are common treatments, many older adults need additional support to manage the condition. Spinal orthoses may offer a practical, non-invasive option to improve posture, reduce symptoms, and increase physical activity. By comparing the effects of these two braces, the study aims to:
- Determine whether these orthoses improve functional mobility, such as walking and muscle performance.
- Provide evidence to guide healthcare professionals in using braces to treat hyperkyphosis.
- Develop a standardized approach for incorporating orthoses into the care of older adults with this condition.
- Improved posture and comfort while moving.
- Increased awareness of their physical health and function.
- Access to state-of-the-art assessments and expert support throughout the study. How Will Results Be Used? The findings will inform healthcare providers about the potential benefits of using spinal braces for older adults with hyperkyphosis. If successful, this research could lead to:
- Better treatment plans for patients.
- Increased availability of braces tailored for older adults.
- Improved quality of life for people living with hyperkyphosis. Key Takeaways for Patients and Families
- Hyperkyphosis is a manageable condition, and this study explores a promising new way to support mobility and independence.
- Participation involves wearing a brace during regular daily activities and attending two comprehensive evaluations.
- The study is safe, non-invasive, and designed to minimize disruptions to daily life. This research offers an exciting opportunity to improve care for older adults with hyperkyphosis. By understanding how braces affect movement and strength, healthcare providers can develop better tools and strategies to support aging populations. Families and caregivers can also benefit from knowing there are new, evidence-based options to help their loved ones stay active and independent.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
ExpectedMay 22, 2025
June 1, 2024
6 months
December 11, 2024
May 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Thoracic Kyphosis Angle (degrees)
Thoracic spinal curvature will be assessed using the Goniometer-Pro® mobile application (Digiflex, USA), which provides a validated digital estimation of the Cobb angle in degrees. The measurement will be performed in the standing position with anatomical reference points on the thoracic spine. Two consistent measures will be averaged. This outcome evaluates structural postural changes over time.
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 16)
Gait Speed (meters/second)
Walking speed will be measured in meters per second using the BTS SMART-D™ 3D motion capture system and a synchronized resistive pressure platform (PWalk 3000, BTS Engineering, Italy). Participants will walk at self-selected speed over a flat walkway, and the average of three valid trials will be reported.
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 16)
Stride Length (centimeters)
Stride length will be assessed using the BTS SMART-D™ 3D motion capture system with markers placed according to the modified Helen Hayes protocol. The mean stride length from three valid gait trials will be calculated.
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 16)
Step Width (centimeters)
Step width will be measured in centimeters using synchronized 3D motion capture and baropodometric analysis. The mediolateral distance between foot placements will be averaged from three valid walking trials.
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 16)
Peak Plantar Pressure (kilopascals)
Peak plantar pressure will be recorded using the PWalk 3000 resistive pressure platform (BTS Engineering). Maximum pressure (kPa) detected during the stance phase of gait will be extracted and averaged across trials.
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 16)
Support Phase Duration (milliseconds)
The duration of the support phase (ms) for each foot during gait will be measured using pressure platform data synchronized with 3D motion capture. The mean of three valid gait cycles will be used.
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 16)
Trunk Muscle Torque (Newton-meters)
Concentric and eccentric peak torque of trunk flexor and extensor muscles will be measured in Newton-meters using the HUMAC NORM™ isokinetic dynamometer. Participants will perform five maximal effort repetitions per contraction mode, and peak torque values will be reported.
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 16)
Shoulder Muscle Torque (Newton-meters)
Peak concentric and eccentric torque (Nm) of internal and external shoulder rotator muscles will be measured bilaterally using the HUMAC NORM™ dynamometer. The test will follow a standardized shoulder positioning protocol. The highest value among five trials will be recorded for each contraction type.
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 16)
Electromyographic Activity (microvolts RMS)
Surface electromyography (sEMG) will be collected using the BTS FREEEMG™ system. RMS values (µV) of selected trunk (erector spinae, rectus abdominis, obliques) and shoulder muscles (infraspinatus, subscapularis, teres minor, etc.) will be recorded during isokinetic tests. Data acquisition follows SENIAM recommendations.
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 16)
Physical Activity Level (milli-gravity units)
Daily physical activity will be measured using ActiGraph™ GT3X accelerometers worn on the hip. The mean vector magnitude (mg) will be calculated from at least 4 valid days, excluding periods of sleep and aquatic activities.
7 consecutive days before baseline (Week -1 to 0) and after final intervention week (Week 15 to 16).
Study Arms (3)
Triple-Adjustable Posture Corrector - Thoracic Spinal Orthosis (Mercur®, Brazil)
EXPERIMENTALThis intervention involves the daily use of the Triple-Adjustable Posture Corrector, a thoracic spinal orthosis manufactured by Mercur® (Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil). The orthosis is used for postural support in older adults with hyperkyphosis. Participants will wear the orthosis for at least four hours per day during waking hours, excluding aquatic activities, bathing, and sleeping.
Generation Dynamic Osteoporosis Brace.
EXPERIMENTALThis intervention involves the daily use of the Generation Dynamic Osteoporosis Brace, a thoracic spinal orthosis manufactured by Bort® (Weinstadt, Germany). Participants will wear the orthosis for at least four hours per day during waking hours, excluding aquatic activities, bathing, and sleeping.
No Intervention - Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this group will not use any spinal orthosis during the study period but will undergo the same biomechanical and functional assessments as the intervention groups.
Interventions
The Triple-Adjustable Posture Corrector is a thoracic spinal orthosis designed to provide biomechanical support and postural correction in individuals with excessive thoracic kyphosis. It consists of elastic and adjustable non-rigid bands positioned around the shoulders and thorax, allowing individualized tension regulation. The brace promotes scapular retraction and axial alignment by increasing proprioceptive feedback and limiting thoracic flexion. Participants randomized to this intervention will be instructed to wear the orthosis for a minimum of four consecutive hours per day, during waking hours, for 16 weeks. The orthosis is to be removed during bathing, aquatic activities, and sleep. Individualized fitting will be provided at baseline by trained personnel, following the manufacturer's guidelines. Adherence will be monitored through self-reported daily logbooks. Participants will be advised to report discomfort, adverse effects, or perceived benefits. The primary clinical obje
The Generation Dynamic Osteoporosis Brace is a semi-rigid thoracic orthosis designed to stabilize the spine and counteract the progression of hyperkyphosis, especially in populations at risk for vertebral fragility. The brace is composed of lightweight, breathable material, with anterior and posterior structural support and adjustable tension straps. It is intended to reduce spinal flexion, improve sagittal alignment, and facilitate back extensor activation. Participants assigned to this group will wear the orthosis for a minimum of four hours daily during waking hours, excluding sleep and aquatic activities, over a 16-week period. The orthosis will be individually fitted at the initial session by a trained physical therapist, following manufacturer protocols to ensure comfort, stability, and effectiveness. Participants will receive a daily logbook to record usage duration, comfort level, and perceived effects. Adherence will be monitored weekly. The brace is intended to improve trun
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 60 years or older
- Clinical diagnosis of hyperkyphosis
- Ability to walk without assistive devices
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment
- Inability to complete the proposed assessments
- Non-compliance with orthosis use during the intervention period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul.
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90619-900, Brazil
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90619-900, Brazil
Related Publications (16)
Stegeman DF, Hermens HJ. Standards for surface electromyography: the European project "Surface EMG for non-invasive assessment of muscles (SENIAM)
BACKGROUNDYang S, Chen C, Du S, Tang Y, Li K, Yu X, Tan J, Zhang C, Rong Z, Xu J, Wu W, Luo F. Assessment of isokinetic trunk muscle strength and its association with health-related quality of life in patients with degenerative spinal deformity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Dec 9;21(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03844-8.
PMID: 33298028BACKGROUNDDauty M, Delbrouck C, Huguet D, Rousseau B, Potiron-Josse M, Dubois C. Reproducibility of concentric and eccentric isokinetic strength of the shoulder rotators in normal subjects 40 to 55 years old. IES. 2003;11(2):95-100. doi:10.3233/IES-2003-0134
BACKGROUNDEdouard P, Samozino P, Julia M, Gleizes Cervera S, Vanbiervliet W, Calmels P, Gremeaux V. Reliability of isokinetic assessment of shoulder-rotator strength: a systematic review of the effect of position. J Sport Rehabil. 2011 Aug;20(3):367-83. doi: 10.1123/jsr.20.3.367.
PMID: 21828388BACKGROUNDValentini FA, Granger B, Hennebelle DS, Eythrib N, Robain G. Repeatability and variability of baropodometric and spatio-temporal gait parameters--results in healthy subjects and in stroke patients. Neurophysiol Clin. 2011 Oct;41(4):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
PMID: 22078730BACKGROUNDKadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME, Gainey J, Gorton G, Cochran GV. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthop Res. 1989;7(6):849-60. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100070611.
PMID: 2795325BACKGROUNDSasaki J, Coutinho A, Santos C, et al. Orientações para utilização de acelerômetros no Brasil. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2017;22(2):110-126. doi:10.12820/rbafs.v.22n2p110-126
BACKGROUNDKochhann R, Varela JS, Lisboa CSM, Chaves MLF. The Mini Mental State Examination: Review of cutoff points adjusted for schooling in a large Southern Brazilian sample. Dement Neuropsychol. 2010 Jan-Mar;4(1):35-41. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642010DN40100006.
PMID: 29213658BACKGROUNDKoele MC, Lems WF, Willems HC. The Clinical Relevance of Hyperkyphosis: A Narrative Review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 24;11:5. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00005. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32038498BACKGROUNDSaghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Nov 9;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-26.
PMID: 15535880BACKGROUNDSerrao M, Casali C, Ranavolo A, Mari S, Conte C, Chini G, Leonardi L, Coppola G, DI Lorenzo C, Harfoush M, Padua L, Pierelli F. Use of dynamic movement orthoses to improve gait stability and trunk control in ataxic patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;53(5):735-743. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04480-X. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
PMID: 28627859BACKGROUNDVeiskarami M, Gholami M, Aboutorabi A, Ahmadi Bani M, Khamesi E. Motor Control Changes in Trunk Muscles after Using Anatomical Posture Control Orthosis in the Elderly Hyperkyphotic Subjects. JMR. Published online September 26, 2022. doi:10.18502/jmr.v16i4.10762
BACKGROUNDCaetano GM, Santos Neto APD, Santos LSC, Fhon JRS. Risco de quedas e seus fatores associados na pessoa idosa hospitalizada. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2023;26:e230155. doi:10.1590/1981-22562023026.230155.pt
BACKGROUNDHosseinabadi M, Kamyab M, Azadinia F, Sarrafzadeh J. Effect of a Spinomed orthosis on balance performance, spinal alignment, joint position sense and back muscle endurance in elderly people with hyperkyphotic posture: A randomized controlled trial. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020 Aug;44(4):234-244. doi: 10.1177/0309364620923816. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
PMID: 32507057BACKGROUNDYao XM, Liu BB, Deng WY, Wang XH. The Awareness and Knowledge Regarding Sarcopenia among Healthcare Professionals: A Scoping Review. J Frailty Aging. 2022;11(3):274-280. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2022.7.
PMID: 35799432BACKGROUNDSeals DR, Justice JN, LaRocca TJ. Physiological geroscience: targeting function to increase healthspan and achieve optimal longevity. J Physiol. 2016 Apr 15;594(8):2001-24. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.282665. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
PMID: 25639909BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rafael R Baptista, PhD
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2024
First Posted
May 14, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share