Auto-regulated Blood Flow Restriction in Athletes With Recurrent Ankle Sprain
The Additional Effect of Auto-Regulated Blood Flow Restriction Exercise on Functional Performance and Muscle Fatigability in Athletes With Recurrent Ankle Sprain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ankle injuries, especially lateral ankle sprains, are prevalent in physically active individuals. Blood Flow Restriction Training (BFRT) has emerged as a promising method, employing partial arterial occlusion and full venous occlusion with low resistance to induce metabolic stress and achieve outcomes akin to heavy resistance training. This Randomized Controlled study explores the application of BFRT in addressing Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI), focusing on its efficacy in strength gains of extrinsic foot muscles, and potential benefits in functional performance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2025
CompletedMay 14, 2025
May 1, 2025
3 months
April 30, 2025
May 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Muscle Strength
An isokinetic dynamometer (Physiomed Elektromedizin AG \[TP Module, CON-TREX MJ\], Schnaittach, Germany) was used for strength testing. Using the previously identified ankle evertors/invertors and plantarflexors/dorsiflexors muscles, the investigators assessed the average peak torque to body weight ratio (concentric/concentric) at an angular velocity of 60°/s. Calibration of the dynamometer was performed prior to evaluation. Submaximal three and maximal three exercise sessions were given to participants to acclimate them to the testing methodology. Each subject rested for two minutes before cycling through the active range of motion three times in a row at maximum concentric contraction. To provide sufficient recovery between contractions, a 5-minute rest interval was included in each test condition. It was expected that participants would give it their all when taking the exam. For every test, the appropriate ankle isokinetic device was used for strength testing.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Foot and ankle disability index
6 weeks
Fatigability level
6 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Auto-regulated blood flow restriction training (ARBFRT+TT)
EXPERIMENTALThis group was recruited to conduct auto-regulated blood flow restriction exercise for 30-min, three times a week for six weeks by a trained physiotherapist.
Non-regulated blood flow restriction training (NRBFRT+TT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group was recruited to conduct non-regulated blood flow restriction exercise for 30-min, three times a week for six weeks by a trained physiotherapist.
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe control group was recruited to conduct no blood flow restriction exercise (Cuff with 0 pressure) 30-min, three times a week for 6 weeks.
Interventions
This group was recruited to conduct auto-regulated blood flow restriction exercise for 30-min, three times a week for six weeks by a trained physiotherapist, the subjects were asked to perform the following exercises: standing single leg calf raises with lateral resistance using a band, seated soleus raise, single leg balance on the edge of a step clearing the front foot with band on the big toe. SmartCuff 3.0 BFRT tool was used to automatically determine the individualized 50% arterial blood occlusion pressure for the BFRT group at the femoral artery, the cuff was connected to the smart tool device for the auto-regulated group to regulate the cuff pressure during muscle contraction and relaxation. The cuff was deflated in between exercises.
This group was recruited to conduct a non-regulated blood flow restriction exercise for 30-min, three times a week for six weeks by a trained physiotherapist, the subjects were asked to perform the following exercises: standing single leg calf raises with lateral resistance using a band, seated soleus raise, single leg balance on the edge of a step clearing the front foot with band on the big toe. SmartCuff 3.0 BFRT tool was used, whilst the cuff was not connected to the device in the non-regulated blood flow restriction training group and the pressure was stabilized as the initial pressure determined by the device in the non-regulated group. The cuff was deflated in between exercises.
This group was recruited to conduct no blood flow restriction exercise 30 min, three times a week for 6 weeks. SmartCuff 3.0 BFRT tool was used, whilst the cuff was not connected to the device and the pressure was 0 (zero) in this group. The cuff was deflated in between exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ranges from 18 to 40 years.
- No other health related conditions such as diabetes or hypertension.
- Unilateral or bilateral CIA.
- Male Athletes.
You may not qualify if:
- Knee or hip injury within the last 3 months.
- Previous ankle surgery.
- Any contraindication for BFRT application such as venous insufficiency, arterial insufficiency, history of DVT.
- Spinal lesion affecting lower limb function.
- Females
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Universitylead
- University of Sharjahcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Walid Kamal Abdelbasset
Sharjah city, Emirate of Sharjah, 27272, United Arab Emirates
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdelbasset
University of Sharjah
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2025
First Posted
May 8, 2025
Study Start
November 1, 2023
Primary Completion
January 30, 2024
Study Completion
February 2, 2024
Last Updated
May 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05