Effect of Maintenance of Intraoperative Normothermia in Cesarean Section on Thermal Comfort, Serum Cortisol and Apgar Score: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Cesarean section is a common method of delivery worldwide today. According to WHO, cesarean section accounts for more than 1 in 5 (21%) of all births, and it is predicted that approximately one-third (29%) of births will be by cesarean section by 2030. Although cesarean section is a vital and life-saving surgery, it can unnecessarily put mothers and babies at risk for short- and long-term health problems when performed without a medical necessity. Unintended perioperative hypothermia, defined as the inadvertent lowering of core temperature below 36°C during surgery, is a well-known complication of anesthesia. Hypothermia can increase the risk of infection by suppressing the immune system, prolonging the recovery process, and triggering postpartum complications. Maintaining maternal body temperature during cesarean section helps reduce postoperative complications, reduce the risk of infection, and accelerate the recovery process. It is also critical for the health of the baby. Keeping the newborn's body temperature stable can help minimize risks such as hypoxia at birth. However, there are increasing studies showing that temperature control is not only limited to maternal health but also has serious effects on the baby after birth. Therefore, it is understood that maintaining body temperature during cesarean section is an important factor in improving the quality of life for both individuals. This article aims to deeply examine the role of temperature control during cesarean section on maternal and fetal health and the benefits of this intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pregnancy
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pregnancy
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
ExpectedMay 8, 2025
April 1, 2025
9 months
April 29, 2025
April 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Concerns of pregnant women who are warmed by a heating pad
Anxiety of pregnant women warmed with a heating pad will be measured with the Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). It is indicated by selecting one of the following options: "(1) None, (2) A Little, (3) A Lot and (4) Completely".
Questions will be asked half an hour before the caesarean section
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Thermal Comfort of Pregnant Women Warmed with a Heating Pad
will be measured half an hour after the cesarean section
Other Outcomes (3)
The effect of warming pregnant women with a heating pad on the Apgar scores of their babies
The Apgar score of the baby born after cesarean section will be evaluated at the 1st and 5th minutes.
Effect of heating pad on shivering of pregnant women
will be measured half an hour before and half an hour after the caesarean section
warming affects serum cortisol level of newborns
After birth, blood will be taken from the umbilical cord and serum cortisol levels will be checked.
Study Arms (2)
Warming group
EXPERIMENTALWhen the pregnant women in the experimental group were laid on the operating table, they were heated from the back with a heating pad. The heating pad remained on the pregnant woman's back throughout the cesarean section. The cesarean section took an average of 35 minutes from the first surgical incision to the completion of the incision after spinal/epidural anesthesia.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONThe patients in this group are given routine care practices of the clinic.
Interventions
When the pregnant women in the experimental group were laid on the operating table, they were heated from the back with a heating pad. The heating pad remained on the pregnant woman's back throughout the cesarean section. The cesarean section took an average of 35 minutes from the first surgical incision to the completion of the incision after spinal/epidural anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being at least a primary school graduate
- Having an elective cesarean section with spinal/epidural anesthesia
- Being at or above the 38th week of pregnancy
- Being in the ASA I (Normal, healthy person with no disease or systemic problem other than surgical pathology that does not cause a systemic disorder) class
- Not being diagnosed with high-risk pregnancy (such as oligodydroamnios, premature membrane rupture, gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, fetal tachycardia, nonreactive NST, intrauterine growth retardation)
- Having a body mass index of \>19 kg/m2 and \<40 kg/m2
- Having a singleton pregnancy
- Having a healthy fetus
- Having a fasting period of 2-6 hours before surgery
- Being normothermic (36-37.5°C) (tympanic measurement) before surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Need for intensive care in the mother or newborn after cesarean section
- Being anemic with a hemoglobin value below 10 g/dl according to the World Health Organization (2001)
- Not having platelet values within the reference values
- Having any disease that will disrupt the bleeding clotting mechanism (hemophilia, liver failure, vitamin K deficiency, etc.)
- Having a body core temperature above 37.5°C and below 36°C on the morning of surgery
- Having malnutrition, thyroid function and other endocrine disorders, Parkinson's, peripheral circulatory disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, heart disease and a history of stroke
- Having any deterioration on the skin surface of the arms and legs (ecchymosis, edema, urticaria, etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Munday J, Osborne S, Yates P, Sturgess D, Jones L, Gosden E. Preoperative Warming Versus no Preoperative Warming for Maintenance of Normothermia in Women Receiving Intrathecal Morphine for Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):183-189. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002026.
PMID: 28514320BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2025
First Posted
May 8, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion
March 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share