Joint Mobilization vs. Strengthening Exercises on Cervical Proprioception for Nonspecific Neck Pain
CervPro-RCT
Comparison of Joint Mobilization vs. Strengthening Exercises for Improving Cervical Proprioception in Individuals With Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial aims to compare the effects of cervical joint mobilization versus cervical strengthening exercises in patients with chronic neck pain. The study will assess neck proprioception, pain intensity, cervical muscle strength, range of motion, and neck disability. The main question it aims to answer is: Which treatment is superior, or do they have equal effects after the first session and after the 12th session? Participants will: Receive either cervical joint mobilization or cervical strengthening exercises for 12 sessions. Do not perform any physical therapy treatment outside the trial. Visit the clinic three times per week for treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2025
CompletedDecember 30, 2025
May 1, 2025
4 months
April 6, 2025
December 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Active cervical movement sense
Participants will be comfortably seated upright on a chair with a backrest, positioned 1 meter away from a board displaying a zigzag pattern (ZZ). They will wear a headband with a laser pointer attached. The pattern is affixed to the board in a manner that directs the laser beam to the pattern's centre.
Three points: 1) baseline, 2) immediately after intervention, and 3) week 4
Cervical joint position error
Participants were comfortably seated upright on a chair with a backrest, positioned 0.9 meters away from a wall. Using a distance laser meter, for accurate measurement, the distance between the forehead of the participant and the wall was measured after the participant wore a headband with a laser pointer attached. A point on the wall was located as the patient was in a self-neutral position. A warm-up session was given as the patient with open eyes was instructed to perform flexion, extension, and rotation on both sides and return to the selected point after each movement. After that, the patient was asked to perform the movement for three trials in each movement direction with their eyes closed.
Three points: 1) baseline, 2) immediately after intervention, and 3) week 4
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Visual Analogue Scale
Three points: 1) baseline, 2) immediately after intervention, and 3) week 4
Cervical muscles strength
Three points: 1) baseline, 2) immediately after intervention, and 3) week 4
Cervical range of motion
Three points: 1) baseline, 2) immediately after intervention, and 3) week 4
Neck Disability Index
Three points: 1) baseline, 2) week 4
Study Arms (2)
Joint mobilization group
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive passive cervical joint mobilization following Maitland's approach for 3 sets of 1 minute on the most painful segment with one minute rest between sets. The specific technique and most painful level will be determined during the clinical examination. The participant lies prone on a treatment bed, then the therapist uses both thumbs to apply grade III or IV based on the patient's irritability using posteroanterior pressure to the cervical spinous process or articular pillar, with a rhythm of 2 to 3 Hz per second. This intervention could be applied in different positions of the cervical spine, depending on the patient's response, in a pain-free manner.
Strengthening exercises group
EXPERIMENTALThe exercise program will include concentric and eccentric training of the craniocervical, cervical flexors, extensors, muscles involved in cervical spine rotation and axioscapular muscles. The strengthening exercises with high frequency - low intensity will be performed. Low frequency - high intensity will be implemented when the patient's irritability is low.
Interventions
Passive cervical joint mobilization following Maitland's approach for 3 sets of 1 minute on the most painful segment with one minute rest between sets.
concentric and eccentric training of the craniocervical, cervical flexors, extensors, muscles involved in cervical spine rotation and axioscapular muscles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 50 years
- Pain ≥ 3 months
- Neck pain on VAS ≥ 3/10
- NDI ≥ 5/50 points
- ZZ Errors ≥ 9 or the time to complete the task ≥ 28s
You may not qualify if:
- Unilateral headache aggravated by neck movement.
- Upper extremity symptoms beyond the elbow.
- Any history of neck trauma including whiplash
- Recent fractures (last 8 weeks)
- Cervical surgery (last 3 months)
- Current neck-related dizziness
- Known or suspected ves3bular pathology
- Internal fixation of the cervical spine
- Physical therapy for the neck (last 3 months)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Universitylead
- Al Hada Military Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Armed Forces Hospital - Al Hada
Ta'if, Mecca Region, Saudi Arabia
Related Publications (4)
Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302.
PMID: 28666405BACKGROUNDde Zoete RMJ. Exercise Therapy for Chronic Neck Pain: Tailoring Person-Centred Approaches within Contemporary Management. J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 15;12(22):7108. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227108.
PMID: 38002720BACKGROUNDde Zoete RM, Armfield NR, McAuley JH, Chen K, Sterling M. Comparative effectiveness of physical exercise interventions for chronic non-specific neck pain: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of 40 randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Nov 2:bjsports-2020-102664. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102664. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33139256BACKGROUNDErnst MJ, Williams L, Werner IM, Crawford RJ, Treleaven J. Clinical assessment of cervical movement sense in those with neck pain compared to asymptomatic individuals. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Oct;43:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
PMID: 31277033BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ali M Alshami, Phd
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2025
First Posted
May 7, 2025
Study Start
October 20, 2024
Primary Completion
February 18, 2025
Study Completion
February 20, 2025
Last Updated
December 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share