tDCS and Musical Performance in Young Orchestra Musicians
Acute Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Technical, Expressive, and Scenic Aspects of Musical Performance in Young Orchestra Instrumentalists: A Proof-of-Concept Study
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve the technical, expressive, and stage aspects of musical performance in young orchestra musicians aged 18 to 30 years. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does active tDCS improve musical performance compared to sham stimulation?
- Does active tDCS reduce music performance anxiety and increase musical self-efficacy? Researchers will compare the active tDCS group to the sham stimulation group to see if active stimulation has positive effects on musical performance and psychological factors. Participants will:
- Receive either active or sham tDCS stimulation
- Perform a musical piece before and after stimulation
- Complete questionnaires about anxiety and musical self-confidence
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
ExpectedMay 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
4 months
April 27, 2025
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Musical Performance Scores (Rubric for the Assessment of Music Performance Achievement)
Musical performance will be evaluated by independent expert judges using a standardized rubric assessing technical, expressive, and stage presence aspects.
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 2 hours after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in Self-Reported Musical Performance Score (0-10 scale)
Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 2 hours after intervention
Music Performance Anxiety (Mazzarolo Music Performance Anxiety Scale - M-MPAS)
Baseline
Musical Self-Efficacy (General Musical Self-Efficacy Scale)
Baseline
Perception of Intervention Received (Active or Sham)
Immediately after intervention
Study Arms (2)
Active tDCS
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with a 2.0 mA anodal current applied over the supplementary motor area (FCz) and cathodal electrode over Fp2 for 30 minutes.
Sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants will receive sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with the same electrode placement as the active group; however, the current will be turned off after 30 seconds to simulate the initial sensations without delivering prolonged stimulation.
Interventions
2.0 mA anodal stimulation applied over FCz with cathode over Fp2 for 30 minutes using a transcranial direct current stimulation device.
Sham stimulation mimicking the sensations of tDCS; the current will be turned off after 30 seconds while maintaining electrode placement over FCz and Fp2.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Musicians aged 18 to 30 years.
- Minimum of 3 years of orchestral performance experience.
- Active participation in a stable orchestra or ensemble.
- No history of neurological or psychiatric disorders.
- Not currently using psychotropic medications or recreational drugs.
- Willingness to participate in all study sessions.
- Signed informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of metallic implants in the head (e.g., cranial pins, aneurysm clips).
- Presence of implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemaker).
- History of epilepsy or seizures.
- Prior experience with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
- Scalp dermatitis or lesions at the electrode placement sites.
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM)
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21041-010, Brazil
Related Publications (6)
Álvarez-Díaz M, Muñiz-Bascón LM, Soria-Alemany A, Veintimilla-Bonet A, Fernández-Alonso R. On the design and validation of a rubric for the evaluation of performance in a musical contest. International Journal of Music Education. 2021;39(1):66-79. doi:10.1177/0255761420936443
BACKGROUNDMazzarolo I, Schubert E. A Short Performance Anxiety Scale for Musicians. Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 26;12:781262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781262. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 35153903BACKGROUNDSanchez-Kuhn A, Perez-Fernandez C, Canovas R, Flores P, Sanchez-Santed F. Transcranial direct current stimulation as a motor neurorehabilitation tool: an empirical review. Biomed Eng Online. 2017 Aug 18;16(Suppl 1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12938-017-0361-8.
PMID: 28830433BACKGROUNDAnic A, Olsen KN, Thompson WF. Investigating the Role of the Primary Motor Cortex in Musical Creativity: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study. Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 1;9:1758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01758. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30327622BACKGROUNDChinzara TT, Buckingham G, Harris DJ. Transcranial direct current stimulation and sporting performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation effects on physical endurance, muscular strength and visuomotor skills. Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Jan;55(2):468-486. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15540. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
PMID: 34904303BACKGROUNDBikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou AL, Jiang J, Adnan T, Mourdoukoutas AP, Kronberg G, Truong D, Boggio P, Brunoni AR, Charvet L, Fregni F, Fritsch B, Gillick B, Hamilton RH, Hampstead BM, Jankord R, Kirton A, Knotkova H, Liebetanz D, Liu A, Loo C, Nitsche MA, Reis J, Richardson JD, Rotenberg A, Turkeltaub PE, Woods AJ. Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):641-661. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
PMID: 27372845BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ricardo Galhardoni, Ph.D
Neuromodulação em Foco
- STUDY CHAIR
Renato Santos de Almeida, Ph.D
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Débora Cristina Lima da Silva, Ph.D
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants, investigators, and outcome assessors will be blinded to group assignment until the end of data collection.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator and Professor at Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2025
First Posted
May 6, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04