Augmented Reality Distraction for Reducing Pain in Pediatric Dental Procedures
AR
Effectiveness of Augmented Reality as a Distraction Technique for Reducing Pain and Anxiety in Pediatric Dental Extractions: A Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR) as a distraction technique to reduce procedural pain and anxiety in children aged 6-10 undergoing primary tooth extraction. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either AR distraction via VR goggles or standard tell-show-do behavior management during local anesthesia administration and extraction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 6, 2026
CompletedJanuary 6, 2026
December 1, 2025
3 months
April 8, 2025
August 23, 2025
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score Using Wong-Baker FACES Scale
Pain was assessed immediately after local anesthesia injection using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. This validated pediatric pain scale consists of six facial expressions ranging from 0 ("No pain") to 10 ("Worst pain"). Children were asked to select the face that best represented their pain experience, which was then converted into a numeric score. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD)and were compared between study arms.
Immediately after the dental extraction procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
1. Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale
Immediately after the dental extraction procedure.
Heart Rate as Physiological Indicator of Anxiety
Immediately post-procedure
Study Arms (2)
AR Distraction
EXPERIMENTALParticipants wear AR/VR goggles showing an interactive cartoon during LA injection and extraction.
Tell-Show-Do
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants undergo standard Tell-Show-Do behavior guidance during treatment.
Interventions
Children aged 6-10 years (both sexes, Egyptian ethnicity) received behavioral management using the Tell-Show-Do (TSD) technique during primary anterior tooth extraction under local infiltration anesthesia. The clinician explained the procedure in child-friendly language (Tell), demonstrated instruments in a non-threatening manner (Show), and then performed the extraction (Do) without augmented reality or audiovisual distraction.
Participants in this group wore augmented reality (AR) goggles during local anesthesia administration and dental extraction. The AR system displayed interactive 3D animated videos (celestial bodies) to divert attention and reduce procedural pain and anxiety.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 6-10 years
- Indicated for anterior primary tooth extraction
- No previous exposure to local anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Medically compromised children
- Children with cognitive or communication impairments
- Children who underwent similar treatment within the past 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut University
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71511, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study was limited by its relatively small sample size and single-center setting, which may affect generalizability. Outcomes were assessed only immediately after the procedure, without longer-term follow-up."
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ahmed Kamel Abdel Naser
- Organization
- Assuit university
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Both participants and outcome assessors/data analysts don't know group assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2025
First Posted
May 2, 2025
Study Start
May 15, 2025
Primary Completion
July 30, 2025
Study Completion
August 15, 2025
Last Updated
January 6, 2026
Results First Posted
January 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12