Shared Decision Making in PTSD Treatment
Implementing and Evaluating a Patient-Centered PTSD Treatment Program for Military Personnel
3 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to learn about how Shared Decision Making, when used to decide treatment, impacts treatment engagement, retention, and outcomes for active duty military personnel seeking treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Shared Decision Making between the service member and the therapists will be used to match patients to 1 of 3 different types of therapy for PTSD: (1) Prolonged Exposure (PE) therapy, (2) Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), or (3) Written Exposure Therapy (WET) in 1 of 2 different frequencies: (1) massed (daily) or (2) spaced (weekly).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
June 22, 2025
June 1, 2025
2.3 years
April 22, 2025
June 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Completion of treatment initiation
Percentage of participants initiate and complete at least one session of evidence-based Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) treatment
Baseline to Treatment Session 1 (approximately 2 weeks)
Completion of all Treatment sessions
The percentage of participants who complete all manualized protocol sessions (i.e., 10 PE sessions, 12 CPT sessions, or 5 WET sessions) or (2) complete treatment early because they have achieved their treatment goals. This will be defined as achieving a 10 point reduction in on the PCL-5 and scoring below the diagnostic cutoff (a PCL- 5 score of ≤ 30), as well as the therapist and patient agreeing that treatment relevant goals have been met.
Baseline to Posttreatment (between 2 months and 7 months, depending on treatment selected and speed of progress)
Preference for type of treatment
Measured on a Likert Scale from 0= no preference to 10= extremely high preference
Measured at Pre-Treatment Shared Decision-Making Session
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5)
The PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure, selected for its dimensional sensitivity, with higher scores reflecting greater PTSD severity. Scoring is based on how much the patient has been bothered by the symptoms in the past month on a scale from "0 = not at all" to "4 = extremely. Scores range from 0-80 with a higher score indicating more severe PTSD.
Baseline to 1 month follow up assessment (between 2 months and 7 months, depending on treatment selected and speed of progress)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Brief Inventory of Psycho-social Functioning
Baseline to 1 month follow up assessment (between 2 months and 7 months, depending on treatment selected and speed of progress)
Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
Baseline to 1 month follow up assessment (between 2 months and 7 months, depending on treatment selected and speed of progress)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)
Baseline to 1 month follow up assessment (between 2 months and 7 months, depending on treatment selected and speed of progress)
Depressive Symptom Index - Suicidality Subscale (DSI-SS)
Baseline to 1 month follow up assessment (between 2 months and 7 months, depending on treatment selected and speed of progress)
Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI)
Baseline to 1 month follow up assessment (between 2 months and 7 months, depending on treatment selected and speed of progress)
Study Arms (6)
Prolonged Exposure (PE) Therapy Massed
EXPERIMENTALDaily treatment sessions Monday-Friday for up to 24 sessions
Prolonged Exposure (PE) Spaced
EXPERIMENTALWeekly treatment formula for up to 24 sessions
Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) Massed
EXPERIMENTALDaily treatment sessions Monday-Friday for up to 24 sessions
Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) spaced
EXPERIMENTALWeekly treatment formula for up to 24 sessions
Written Exposure Therapy (WET) Massed
EXPERIMENTALDaily treatment sessions Monday-Friday for up to 24 sessions
Written Exposure Therapy (WET) Spaced
EXPERIMENTALWeekly treatment formula for up to 24 sessions
Interventions
PE is a cognitive-behavioral treatment for PTSD that is typically delivered in ten 90-minute sessions . For the current study using a variable length approach, participants may complete up to 24 sessions. Based on emotional processing theory PE addresses trauma-related avoidance of thoughts, behaviors, and situations, as well as unhelpful beliefs about oneself, others, and the world that were learned as a result of trauma.
CPT is a 12-session, cognitive behavioral PTSD treatment typically delivered in 60-minute sessions that can be personalized to include fewer or additional sessions. For the current study using a variable length approach, participants may complete up to 24 sessions. CPT is based in cognitive theory and posits that impeded recovery following trauma occurs due to unhelpful and unrealistic beliefs that may develop after trauma, leading to chronic anger, guilt, shame, and avoidance of trauma reminders. During CPT, patients learn about PTSD symptoms, impeded recovery and cognitive theory, and the connection between trauma-based thoughts and feelings.
WET is a cognitive behavioral therapy for PTSD that typically consists of 5 weekly 50-minute sessions. For the current study using a variable length approach, participants may complete up to 7 sessions. WET is based on an extinction and emotional processing treatment model. First, patients learn about PTSD and the role of avoidance in maintaining PTSD symptoms. Next, patients are guided to write about their trauma for 30 minutes and afterwards, the therapist briefly checks in with the patient. This procedure is followed for the next 4 sessions, with guidance to first write about the trauma, and in later sessions to write about consequences of the trauma and the patient's current meaning of their lives. The goals of WET are to assist the patient in emotionally processing the event and reduce avoidance of trauma-related thoughts and memories, which facilities recovery.
The study will use the SHARE Approach to facilitate treatment planning and decision-making. SHARE stands for: 1. Seek the patient's participation 2. Help the patient explore and compare treatment options 3. Assess the patient's values and preferences 4. Reach a decision with the patient 5. Evaluate the patient's decision The Shared Decision Making Patient Preference Checklist will be used to determine the participant's preference for type of treatment, frequency of treatment sessions, and treatment delivery modality. Step 5 also includes following up with the patient and making changes if something it not working well for the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult active duty military service members aged 18 or older.
- Meets diagnostic criteria for PTSD based on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (CAPS-5).
You may not qualify if:
- Acute suicidality or homicidality requiring immediate intervention, such as hospitalization.
- Moderate to severe brain injury as assessed by the History of Head Injury Form
- Severe alcohol consumption patterns as assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and warranting immediate intervention as determined by clinical judgement.
- Experiencing active psychosis or mania as determined by scores on the Prodromal Questionnaire and Mood Disorder Questionnaire in combination with clinical judgement.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center (CRDAMC)
Fort Cavazos, Texas, 76544, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Related Publications (3)
Resick PA, Wachen JS, Dondanville KA, LoSavio ST, Young-McCaughan S, Yarvis JS, Pruiksma KE, Blankenship A, Jacoby V, Peterson AL, Mintz J; STRONG STAR Consortium. Variable-length Cognitive Processing Therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in active duty military: Outcomes and predictors. Behav Res Ther. 2021 Jun;141:103846. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103846. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
PMID: 33894644BACKGROUNDFoa EB, McLean CP, Zang Y, Rosenfield D, Yadin E, Yarvis JS, Mintz J, Young-McCaughan S, Borah EV, Dondanville KA, Fina BA, Hall-Clark BN, Lichner T, Litz BT, Roache J, Wright EC, Peterson AL; STRONG STAR Consortium. Effect of Prolonged Exposure Therapy Delivered Over 2 Weeks vs 8 Weeks vs Present-Centered Therapy on PTSD Symptom Severity in Military Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):354-364. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21242.
PMID: 29362795BACKGROUNDSloan DM, Marx BP, Resick PA, Young-McCaughan S, Dondanville KA, Straud CL, Mintz J, Litz BT, Peterson AL; STRONG STAR Consortium. Effect of Written Exposure Therapy vs Cognitive Processing Therapy on Increasing Treatment Efficiency Among Military Service Members With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2140911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40911.
PMID: 35015065BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vanessa Jacoby, PhD
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alan L Peterson, PhD
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2025
First Posted
May 1, 2025
Study Start
May 9, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
June 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- At completion of the study, summary results will be posted to ClinicalTrials.gov and after review and publication in a peer review journal.
As a STRONG STAR study, presentations and publications produced as a result of this work will follow the STRONG STAR Standard Operating Procedure STRONG STAR-ADM-001-5.0. The investigators will share deidentified date with other researchers.