NCT06953258

Brief Summary

As aging leads to a decline in muscle function and overall physical performance, interventions targeting muscle strength and neuromechanical properties are critical for maintaining functional independence in older adults. Long-length eccentric training has shown promise in enhancing muscle performance, but its effects in older adults, particularly in a home-based setting, remain underexplored. The aim of this trial is to assess whether a targeted home-based training intervention incorporating long-length eccentric contractions can enhance functional capacity and neuromechanical properties in healthy older adults. Participants will be semi-randomly allocated to one of two groups: an experimental group incorporating long-length eccentric contractions (Group 1) or a conventional resistance training group (Group 2), with group assignment stratified to ensure an equal number of men and women in each group. Each participant will complete three laboratory-based experimental sessions (i.e., two Pre-training sessions and one Post-training session) , during which five key evaluations will be conducted: (i) the 5-Time Sit to Stand test, serving as the primary outcome measure; (ii) the Timed Up and Go test; (iii) assessments of isometric and dynamic muscle strength in the knee extensors and plantar flexors; (iv) measurements of the cross-sectional areas of the vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, gastrocnemius medialis, and soleus muscles; and (v) evaluation of tendon stiffness. Following the pre-evaluation, each participant will engage in a 24-session, semi-supervised, home-based training protocol over a period of 8 to 11 weeks. The training program will include eight exercises, with four targeting the upper limbs and four focused on the lower limbs. Group 1 will perform the lower limb exercises at long muscle lengths, while Group 2 will perform the same exercises in a conventional manner (i.e., at neutral or shorter muscle lengths). The total training volume (calculated as repetitions × sets, in arbitrary units) will be matched across both groups, ensuring that any observed differences in outcomes are attributable to the specific training modality rather than differences in workload.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
10mo left

Started Sep 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress46%
Sep 2025Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 16, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 1, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 16, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

agingeccentric trainingsupervisionfunctional capacitiesneuromechanical properties

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 5 times Sit to Stand

    The subjects will complete five times STS repetitions on a standardized armless chair. After the cue "ready, set, go!", the subjects will start performing STS repetitions as rapidly as possible from the sitting position with their buttocks touching the chair to the full standing position, with their arms crossed over the chest. Verbal encouragement will be given during the test. The STS test will finish when the subjects sit on the chair after the fifth STS repetition, and the time needed to complete the task will be recorded with a stopwatch to the nearest 0.01 s.

    At baseline (i.e., prior to the start of training) and at study completion (i.e., within one week following the final training session

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Isometric and dynamic muscle strength

    At baseline (i.e., prior to the start of training) and at study completion (i.e., within one week following the final training session

  • Timed Up and Go Test

    At baseline (i.e., prior to the start of training) and at study completion (i.e., within one week following the final training session

  • Cross sectional areas of vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), soleus (SOL) and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) muscles.

    At baseline (i.e., prior to the start of training) and at study completion (i.e., within one week following the final training session

  • Stiffness of VL and Achilles tendons

    At baseline (i.e., prior to the start of training) and at study completion (i.e., within one week following the final training session

  • Training metrics

    Participants will complete the questions after each training session, resulting in 24 recordings.

Study Arms (2)

Long muscle length eccentric training program

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants assigned to this arm will complete a home-based training program consisting of 24 sessions, including 20 sessions performed independently at home and 4 sessions conducted in small groups at the laboratory. The laboratory-based sessions will be scheduled in coordination with each participant to ensure regular spacing-approximately one supervised session every five home-based sessions-while accommodating individual availability. Group sizes will be maintained between 2 and 5 participants per session to foster motivation and promote adherence. The training program will include conventional resistance exercises, with progressive increases in intensity and volume tailored to each participant's capabilities. In this intervention group, four specific exercises targeting the knee extensors and plantar flexors will be performed at long muscle lengths, distinguishing it from Group #2, where these exercises will be performed in a conventional manner (i.e., at neutral or shorter mus

Other: Home-based eccentric training at long muscle length

Conventional training program

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this arm will follow a home-based resistance training program consisting of 24 sessions, including 20 sessions performed independently at home and 4 sessions conducted in small groups at the laboratory, as previously described. The training will involve conventional resistance exercises, with progressive adjustments in intensity and volume based on each participant's physical capacity and progression. Note: the total training volume (i.e., number of repetitions × number of sets, in arbitrary units) will be matched between groups, ensuring that any differences in outcomes can be attributed to the specific training modality rather than differences in workload.

Other: Conventional home-based training

Interventions

The training program will include conventional resistance exercises, with progressive increases in intensity and volume tailored to each participant's capabilities. In this condition, specific to the Arm #1, four specific exercises targeting the knee extensors and plantar flexors will be performed at long muscle lengths.

Also known as: Physical training
Long muscle length eccentric training program

The training program will include conventional resistance exercises, with progressive increases in intensity and volume tailored to each participant's capabilities. In this condition, specific to the Arm#2, four specific exercises targeting the knee extensors and plantar flexors will be performed in a conventional manner (i.e., at neutral or shorter muscle lengths).

Also known as: Physical training
Conventional training program

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men or women 60 years and older
  • Individuals eligible for social security coverage
  • Individuals without health issues (e.g., musculoskeletal injuries, chronic conditions)
  • Individuals who have given their informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Accustomed to resistance exercise (i.e., no participation in a resistance training program within the 6 months prior to enrollment, or not engaging in lower-limb resistance training more than once per week as part of their current routine).
  • Pathologies affecting muscle strength in the lower limbs (e.g., neurological or neuromuscular conditions, history of ankle or knee trauma)
  • Individuals residing in a healthcare or social institution
  • Individuals receiving psychiatric care
  • Individuals deprived of their liberty
  • Adults under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, or legal safeguard)
  • Participation in another ongoing biomedical research study
  • Individuals in an emergency situation
  • Individuals not covered by social security
  • BMI over 30
  • Minimal Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 25 or lower
  • Significant visual impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

MIP Laboratory, Nantes University

Nantes, 44300, France

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Tsai LL, McNamara RJ, Moddel C, Alison JA, McKenzie DK, McKeough ZJ. Home-based telerehabilitation via real-time videoconferencing improves endurance exercise capacity in patients with COPD: The randomized controlled TeleR Study. Respirology. 2017 May;22(4):699-707. doi: 10.1111/resp.12966. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

    PMID: 27992099BACKGROUND
  • Thiebaud RS, Funk MD, Abe T. Home-based resistance training for older adults: a systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014 Oct;14(4):750-7. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12326. Epub 2014 Aug 11.

    PMID: 25109883BACKGROUND
  • Souron R, Nosaka K, Jubeau M. Changes in central and peripheral neuromuscular fatigue indices after concentric versus eccentric contractions of the knee extensors. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Apr;118(4):805-816. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3816-0. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

    PMID: 29411127BACKGROUND
  • Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn DI, Vigotsky AD, Franchi MV, Krieger JW. Hypertrophic Effects of Concentric vs. Eccentric Muscle Actions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Sep;31(9):2599-2608. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001983.

    PMID: 28486337BACKGROUND
  • Marusic J, Vatovec R, Markovic G, Sarabon N. Effects of eccentric training at long-muscle length on architectural and functional characteristics of the hamstrings. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Nov;30(11):2130-2142. doi: 10.1111/sms.13770. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

    PMID: 32706442BACKGROUND
  • Maeo S, Huang M, Wu Y, Sakurai H, Kusagawa Y, Sugiyama T, Kanehisa H, Isaka T. Greater Hamstrings Muscle Hypertrophy but Similar Damage Protection after Training at Long versus Short Muscle Lengths. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Apr 1;53(4):825-837. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002523.

    PMID: 33009197BACKGROUND
  • LaStayo PC, Pierotti DJ, Pifer J, Hoppeler H, Lindstedt SL. Eccentric ergometry: increases in locomotor muscle size and strength at low training intensities. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000 May;278(5):R1282-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.278.5.R1282.

    PMID: 10801298BACKGROUND
  • Katsura Y, Takeda N, Hara T, Takahashi S, Nosaka K. Comparison between eccentric and concentric resistance exercise training without equipment for changes in muscle strength and functional fitness of older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 Jul;119(7):1581-1590. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04147-0. Epub 2019 May 4.

    PMID: 31055678BACKGROUND
  • Guex K, Degache F, Morisod C, Sailly M, Millet GP. Hamstring Architectural and Functional Adaptations Following Long vs. Short Muscle Length Eccentric Training. Front Physiol. 2016 Aug 3;7:340. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00340. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27536252BACKGROUND
  • Fitze DP, Franchi MV, Muller Brusco C, Engeler N, Frey WO, Sporri J. Hamstrings and quadriceps muscle size and strength in female and male elite competitive alpine skiers. Front Physiol. 2025 Jan 9;15:1444300. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1444300. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 39850451BACKGROUND
  • Doguet V, Nosaka K, Guevel A, Thickbroom G, Ishimura K, Jubeau M. Muscle length effect on corticospinal excitability during maximal concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions of the knee extensors. Exp Physiol. 2017 Nov 1;102(11):1513-1523. doi: 10.1113/EP086480. Epub 2017 Sep 30.

    PMID: 28796385BACKGROUND
  • Doguet V, Jubeau M, Dorel S, Couturier A, Lacourpaille L, Guevel A, Guilhem G. Time-Course of Neuromuscular Changes during and after Maximal Eccentric Contractions. Front Physiol. 2016 Apr 18;7:137. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00137. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27148075BACKGROUND
  • Clarke EC, Martin JH, d'Entremont AG, Pandy MG, Wilson DR, Herbert RD. A non-invasive, 3D, dynamic MRI method for measuring muscle moment arms in vivo: demonstration in the human ankle joint and Achilles tendon. Med Eng Phys. 2015 Jan;37(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

    PMID: 25466777BACKGROUND
  • Bizet B, Nordez A, Tallio T, Lacourpaille L, Cattagni T, Colard J, Betus Y, Dorel S, Sarcher A, Seynnes O, Andrade RJ. Eight weeks of eccentric training at long-muscle length increases fascicle length independently of adaptations in passive mechanical properties. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2025 Apr 1;138(4):939-949. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00859.2024. Epub 2025 Mar 6.

    PMID: 40048648BACKGROUND
  • Blazevich AJ, Coleman DR, Horne S, Cannavan D. Anatomical predictors of maximum isometric and concentric knee extensor moment. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Apr;105(6):869-78. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0972-7. Epub 2009 Jan 20.

    PMID: 19153760BACKGROUND
  • Chaabene H, Prieske O, Herz M, Moran J, Hohne J, Kliegl R, Ramirez-Campillo R, Behm DG, Hortobagyi T, Granacher U. Home-based exercise programmes improve physical fitness of healthy older adults: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis with relevance for COVID-19. Ageing Res Rev. 2021 May;67:101265. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101265. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

    PMID: 33571702BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Physical Conditioning, Human

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: We will compare two training groups that differ in the way the exercises are performed: one group will perform the eccentric phase of the movement at long muscle length, while the other will complete the same exercises in their conventional form.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2025

First Posted

May 1, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

May 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The Individual Participant Data (IPD) will be made available to other researchers upon request, under specific conditions. A data-sharing plan will be developed in accordance with the relevant ethical guidelines, ensuring participant confidentiality and data protection. We will collaborate with other researchers interested in neuromechanical adaptations and aging-related functional capacities, sharing anonymized data via a secure platform. Access to the IPD will be granted only to those who meet the criteria for research use and will be subject to institutional review board approval. Our intention is to promote transparency and foster further exploration in this field while respecting participant privacy and the integrity of the data. We are committed to making the following data available: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Informed Consent Form, and Analytic Code. This will ensure transparency, reproducibility, and facilitate further research in the field

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
At the end of study completion.

Locations