Efficiency of Function-oriented Taping Application in Low Back Pain Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose of this study is to determine the efficiency of functional tape application to patients with acute or subacute low back pain. 40 patients with acute-subacute low back pain were divided into two groups: control and experimental group. To control group, McKenzie exercises, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Hot Pack (HP) and pulsed ultrasound treatments were applied. To experimental group, functional taping were applied in addition of these treatments. Range of Motion (ROM), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated preand post-treatment and datas were analyzed with statistical methods. In analysis; p value was accepted p\<0,05 for t test and Mann Whitney U test process. In the measurements that compared the improvement of both groups, based on pre- and post-treatment evaluations; improvement in the experimental group was significantly higher in all of these parameters of ROM, VAS, TSK and ODI than in the control group (p\<0,05). The use of functional rigid taping in patients with acute and subacute low back pain provided a statistically significant improvement in all measured values of patients and provide better results than the control group. However, there is a need for comparative new studies in order to measure the effectiveness of rigid taping in a more accurate way.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2025
CompletedApril 30, 2025
February 1, 2025
4 months
February 17, 2025
April 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Range of Motion
The flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral flexion range of motion of the lumbar region will be measured using a goniometer
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Pain intensity
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will evaluate low back pain by asking participants to mark their pain level on a 10 cm scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates severe pain, based on their experience over the past week.
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks.
Degree of kinesiophobia
The Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale measures an individual's level of fear related to movement. Participants complete a 17-item questionnaire, indicating their fear and anxiety levels towards specific physical activities or movements. The scale uses a scoring system from 1 to 4 for each item, with a total score of up to 68. Higher scores indicate a higher level of kinesiophobia, while lower scores indicate less fear.
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Disability Index
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) measures functional limitations in daily activities due to low back pain. The questionnaire consists of 10 sections, each assessing difficulties experienced by the participant due to pain. Participants rate each section from 0 to 5. The total score indicates the level of disability, with higher scores reflecting greater limitations in the individual's quality of life.
through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
functional taping
EXPERIMENTALMcKenzie exercises, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Hot Pack (HP) and pulsed ultrasound treatments were applied.To experimental group, functional taping were applied in addition of these treatments.
control group with only exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATORMcKenzie exercises, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Hot Pack (HP) and pulsed ultrasound treatments
Interventions
McKenzie exercises, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Hot Pack (HP) and pulsed ultrasound treatments were applied.To experimental group, functional taping were applied in addition of these treatments.
McKenzie exercises, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Hot Pack (HP) and pulsed ultrasound treatments
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being between the ages of 20 and 65
- Being literate in Turkish
- Having lower back pain for less than 3 months
- Informed Consent Form for taping application to have been signed
You may not qualify if:
- Allergic reaction on the skin
- Hypertension, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and Presence of accompanying systemic disease other than hypercholesterolemia
- Not being able to communicate
- Using corsets and similar supports
- Having a body mass index \> 30
- Use of antidepressant and myorelexan medication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Uskudar Üniversity Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department
Istanbul, Ümraniye, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asst. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2025
First Posted
April 30, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 23, 2017
Last Updated
April 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share