Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Scalp Block vs Bupivacaine Alone for Hemodynamics Stability in Craniotomy
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigator tested the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine compared to bupivacaine alone in mean arterial pressure stability in adult patients undergoing craniotomy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2025
CompletedApril 30, 2025
March 1, 2024
6 months
April 4, 2025
April 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraoperative mean arterial pressure measured after Mayfeild insertion during craniotomies.
Mean blood pressure (MAP) was monitored continuously and recorded at Base line, before Mayfield placement, after 5mins of Mayfield insertion and at the end of surgery. The hemodynamic parameters at each step of recording were compared between the two groups.
During the operation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Surgeon satisfaction as regard surgical field. Postoperative VAS score and time for 1st rescue analgesia. Total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours postoperative.
During 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Group SB (n =18 patient) will receive scalp block with Bupivacaine alone.
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Group SB: 20 ml of Bupivacaine 0.25% was given Scalp nerve block was done under complete aseptic condition where local infiltration of local anesthetic (LA) was done guided by bony superficial landmarks to block the supraorbital, supratrochlear, auriculotemporal, occipital, and post auricular branches of the greater auricular nerves. In both group maximal dose of Bupivacaine was not exceed (2.5 mg/kg).
Group SD (n =18 patient) will receive scalp block with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn group SD: local infiltration of total volume 20 ml which include (Bupivacaine 0.25%. + Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg) was given. Dexmedetomidine preparation was done by 2 ml (200 mcg) diluted by 18 ml normal saline in 20 ml syringe as 1 ml was contained 10 mcg and was used. Scalp block was given by the same way as group SB. In both group maximal dose of Bupivacaine was not exceed (2.5 mg/kg).
Interventions
In Group SB: (LA) was done by 20ml of Bupivacaine 0.25%. maximal dose of Bupivacaine did not exceed (2.5 mg/kg) Scalp nerve block will be done by anesthesiologist who is blind to the drug being injected and under complete septic condition where local infiltration of local anesthetic (LA) will be done guided by bony superficial landmarks to block the supraorbital, supratrochlear, auriculotemporal, occipital, and post auricular branches of the greater auricular nerves
local infiltration of total volume 20ml which include (Bupivacaine 0.25%. + Dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg) was done Dexmedetomidine preparation was done by 2ml (200 mcg) diluted by 18 ml normal saline in 20 ml syringe as 1ml was contain 10 mcg and injected at same points as above
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged from 18 to 65 years.
- Patients ASA I or II undergoing supratentorial elective planned craniotomies.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients refused to participate in the study.
- Patients with cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension or low cardiac reserve.
- History or known allergy to the used local anesthetic or opioids.
- Patient could not understand a visual analog scale (VAS).
- Bleeding disorders.
- Evidence of local infection at site of injection. 7. Emergency craniotomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams university
Cairo, Egypt, 11111, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yara Sa Ghareb, MBBCH
Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2025
First Posted
April 30, 2025
Study Start
March 10, 2024
Primary Completion
September 10, 2024
Study Completion
September 10, 2024
Last Updated
April 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
After paper publication