Video Laryngeal Mask vs. Endotracheal Tube in Septoplasty
Comparison of Video Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube Use for Airway Safety in Patients Undergoing Septoplasty
1 other identifier
observational
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial compares a video laryngeal mask airway (VLMA) and an endotracheal tube (ETT) in adult patients undergoing elective septoplasty. The primary objective is to see which device more effectively prevents surgical blood contamination in the glottic and subglottic regions. The study also assesses perioperative hemodynamic stability, ventilation parameters, and postoperative recovery factors such as sore throat, hoarseness, and overall patient comfort. The findings aim to help determine the optimal airway device choice for nasal surgeries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJune 12, 2025
June 1, 2025
5 months
March 24, 2025
June 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Glottis/Trachea and Distal Trachea Blood Contamination Scores
The presence of blood contamination will be evaluated separately at two distinct airway sites: Distal trachea: Both SaCoVLM and ETT groups will undergo fiberoptic bronchoscopic evaluation for blood contamination in the distal trachea immediately before removal of the airway device at the end of surgery. Glottis/tracheal inlet: This area will be visually assessed only in the SaCoVLM group using the integrated camera of the video laryngeal mask immediately prior to device removal at the end of surgery. A standardized 4-point scale will be used for both assessments: 1. = No blood contamination 2. = Mild amount of blood contamination (trace amounts) 3. = Moderate amount of blood contamination 4. = Severe amount of blood contamination
Evaluated once at the conclusion of surgery, immediately prior to device removal (approximately 60-120 minutes after anesthesia induction).
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Heart Rate (HR)
From preoperative baseline until arrival to the recovery unit (approximately 120 minutes).
Postoperative Sore Throat (POST Score)
Up to 48 hours postoperatively.
Arterial Blood Pressure (Systolic, Diastolic, and Mean)
From preoperative baseline until arrival to the recovery unit (approximately 120 minutes).
Total Remifentanil Consumption
Intraoperative
Airway Insertion Time
Immediately after induction of anesthesia
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
VLMA Group
Participants assigned to this group will receive airway management via a video laryngeal mask airway (VLMA) with an integrated camera system for direct visualization of the laryngeal inlet. The distal tracheal region will also be examined using a fiberoptic bronchoscope introduced through the VLMA lumen prior to device removal, to assess potential blood contamination. Perioperative parameters (e.g., ventilation metrics, hemodynamic data) and postoperative recovery outcomes will be recorded and analyzed.
ETT Group
Participants in this group will receive airway management using a standard endotracheal tube (ETT) inserted via direct laryngoscopy. At the end of surgery, the distal tracheal region will be examined through the endotracheal tube using a fiberoptic bronchoscope to assess the presence of blood contamination. Perioperative parameters (e.g., ventilation metrics, hemodynamic data) and postoperative recovery outcomes will be recorded and compared with those of the VLMA group.
Interventions
A second-generation supraglottic airway device with an integrated video camera, used for airway management in adult patients undergoing elective septoplasty. The device allows real-time visualization of the glottic inlet to identify blood infiltration or anatomical challenges. Prior to removal, a fiberoptic bronchoscope will be introduced through the device's lumen to assess the distal trachea for blood contamination. Parameters such as airway insertion time, ventilation mechanics, hemodynamic data, analgesic requirements, and postoperative recovery scores (e.g., Aldrete score, sore throat incidence) will be recorded and analyzed.
A standard cuffed endotracheal tube inserted using direct laryngoscopy, employed for airway management during elective septoplasty. At the end of surgery, a fiberoptic bronchoscope will be passed through the ETT to evaluate the distal trachea for blood contamination. Airway insertion time, ventilation parameters, intraoperative hemodynamics, analgesic use, and postoperative outcomes (including sore throat and recovery scores) will be documented and compared with the VLMA group to assess differences in airway safety and clinical performance.
Eligibility Criteria
This study includes adult patients (aged 18-65 years) undergoing elective septoplasty under general anesthesia. Participants are classified as ASA I-II and are randomly assigned to the VLMA or ETT groups. Patients with anticipated difficult airway, high BMI (\>30), GERD, or pregnancy are excluded
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-II classification patients
- Patients aged 18-65 years undergoing elective septoplasty
You may not qualify if:
- ASA III-IV classification patients
- Patients with anticipated difficult airway
- Patients under 18 years of age
- History of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or hiatal hernia
- Body mass index (BMI) \>30
- Pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsun University, Samsun Training and Research Hospital
Samsun, Ilkadim, 55000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Kaplan A, Crosby GJ, Bhattacharyya N. Airway protection and the laryngeal mask airway in sinus and nasal surgery. Laryngoscope. 2004 Apr;114(4):652-5. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200404000-00010.
PMID: 15064618BACKGROUNDKaraaslan E, Akbas S, Ozkan AS, Colak C, Begec Z. A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01222-4.
PMID: 33407130BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hatice Selcuk KUSDERCI, M.D.
Samsun University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2025
First Posted
April 30, 2025
Study Start
May 30, 2025
Primary Completion
November 3, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
June 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06