Upper Limb Function in Mental Health Disorders
UFMC-MH2025
Upper Limb Functional Capacity in Individuals Diagnosed With Mental Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study
2 other identifiers
observational
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Individuals with mental disorders (MD) often experience motor issues, yet upper limb functionality remains understudied. Objective: To compare upper limb function in individuals with and without MD, focusing on motor capacity, dexterity, and performance. Design: Cross-sectional, qualitative, multicenter study. Methods: Assessed strength, motor skills, sensitivity, and daily function. Used T-test, Mann-Whitney U, Spearman correlation, and Chi-square.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2025
CompletedApril 29, 2025
November 1, 2024
4 months
April 8, 2025
April 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)
Assesses fine manual dexterity. Participants place and remove nine pegs from holes as quickly as possible, using one hand at a time. The test is performed twice, and the average time is recorded. Lower scores indicate better fine motor skills. The NHPT has shown high test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency in previous studies, including Spanish-speaking populations.
3 weeks
Box and Block Test (BBT)
Measures gross manual dexterity. Participants move as many blocks as possible from one compartment of a box to another in one minute, using each hand separately. Blocks must be moved over a dividing wall without throwing or bumping. Higher scores indicate better gross dexterity. The BBT is widely used and validated across different populations.
3 weeks
Digital Hand Dynamometer
Evaluates grip strength. Participants squeeze a hydraulic hand dynamometer three times with each hand while seated with the elbow at 90°. The average of the three trials is used. Higher scores indicate greater grip strength. This test has strong validity, sensitivity, and reliability, including among Spanish-speaking populations.
3 weeks
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test
Assesses tactile sensitivity. Monofilaments of varying thickness are applied to specific areas of the hand (fingertips, palm, back of the hand). The finest filament perceived consistently (at least 2 out of 3 times) is recorded as the sensitivity threshold. There is limited psychometric data available in Spanish-speaking populations, though the test is widely used clinically.
3 weeks
Two-Point Discrimination Test (Touch-Test)
Evaluates tactile discrimination ability. Two points are applied to the skin at decreasing distances until the participant can no longer distinguish them as separate. Tested on the same hand areas as the monofilament test. It assesses the density of tactile receptors and sensory pathway integrity. Psychometric properties in Spanish-speaking populations are not well established.
3 weeks
QuickDASH Questionnaire
A shortened version of the DASH questionnaire, designed to evaluate disability and symptoms in the upper limb. It consists of 11 items rated on a 5-point scale. Higher scores indicate worse functional ability. Both the original and Spanish versions have demonstrated good reliability, internal consistency, sensitivity to change, and construct validity.
3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
EXPERIMENTAL GROUP
Participants diagnosed with a mental disorder (MD). Evaluated for upper limb functionality, including strength, fine and gross manual dexterity, sensitivity, tactile discrimination, and performance in activities of daily living (ADL).
CONTROL GROUP
Participants without any diagnosed mental disorder. Assessed using the same measures to serve as a baseline for comparison with the MD group.
Eligibility Criteria
A convenience sample of 38 participants was obtained, consisting of 19 individuals diagnosed with a mental disorder (MD) and 19 healthy controls. Initially, 40 participants were contacted; however, two were unable to participate due to scheduling conflicts that prevented them from completing the assessment.
You may qualify if:
- Mental Disorder Group
- Participants with a mental disorder (MD) had to meet the following criteria:
- A formal diagnosis of a mental disorder according to the DSM-V.
- Aged between 18 and 65 years.
- Treatment stability, defined as being under stable pharmacological and psychiatric treatment for at least three months.
- Clinical stability, meaning no acute psychiatric episodes in the last three months that could interfere with participation in the study.
- Ability to follow instructions and communicate effectively, confirmed by scoring at least 23 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
- Control Group (Healthy Participants)
- Aged between 18 and 65 years.
- Ability to follow instructions and communicate effectively, also defined by a minimum MMSE score of 23.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of neurological conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, stroke, or similar disorders.
- History of upper limb rehabilitation within the past six months.
- Any acute or chronic condition affecting the upper limb that could interfere with the results, including but not limited to arthritis, osteoarthritis, or carpal tunnel syndrome.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Burgos
Burgos, Burgos, 09001, Spain
Related Publications (5)
Jiang R, Westwater ML, Noble S, Rosenblatt M, Dai W, Qi S, Sui J, Calhoun VD, Scheinost D. Associations between grip strength, brain structure, and mental health in > 40,000 participants from the UK Biobank. BMC Med. 2022 Sep 9;20(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02490-2.
PMID: 36076200BACKGROUNDDesrosiers J, Bravo G, Hebert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jul;75(7):751-5.
PMID: 8024419BACKGROUNDMoreno-Morente G, Hurtado-Pomares M, Sanchez-Perez A, Terol-Cantero MC. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Feasibility of the NHPT-E of Manual Dexterity for the Spanish Population. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 27;12(5):550. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050550.
PMID: 38470661BACKGROUNDWalther S, Mittal VA, Stegmayer K, Bohlhalter S. Gesture deficits and apraxia in schizophrenia. Cortex. 2020 Dec;133:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
PMID: 33099076BACKGROUNDVale N, Gandolfi M, Mazzoleni S, Battini E, Dimitrova EK, Gajofatto A, Ferraro F, Castelli M, Camin M, Filippetti M, De Paoli C, Picelli A, Corradi J, Chemello E, Waldner A, Saltuari L, Smania N. Characterization of Upper Limb Impairments at Body Function, Activity, and Participation in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis by Behavioral and EMG Assessment: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Neurol. 2020 Feb 14;10:1395. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01395. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 32116983BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2025
First Posted
April 29, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion
January 25, 2025
Study Completion
March 25, 2025
Last Updated
April 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- The IPD will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified researchers. Start date for data availability: January 1, 2026 End date for data availability: December 31, 2030
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions, healthcare organizations, or research centers will be eligible to request access to the individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documentation. Access will be granted for non-commercial, scientific research purposes only.
The individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in this study-including anonymized data on motor assessments, functional performance, and demographic variables-will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified researchers. Requests include a clear research purpose and it is reviewed and approved by the principal investigator and the ethics committee, ensuring data privacy and compliance with relevant regulations. Data will be shared in a de-identified format to protect participant confidentiality.