Children's Preferences on Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques
Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques: What Influences Children's Preferences?
1 other identifier
interventional
131
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this crossover study is to compare children's perceptions and preferences regarding digital and conventional impression techniques in the 5- to 11-year-old age group. The main questions it aims to answer are
- Which impression methods do kids prefer?
- What influences kids' perception of impression methods? Dental impressions will be obtained using both the conventional alginate impression (CAI) (Cavex ColorChange; Cavex Holland BV, Haarlem, the Netherlands) and digital intraoral scanning procedure (DIS) (3Shape TRIOS Color, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). After each procedure, patients will score their perceptions using a Modified Impression Perception Test, a 5-point Likert scale, for gag reflex, queasiness, difficulty breathing, uncomfortable feeling, pain perception, chairside time, and stress levels. Dental anxiety will be assessed using the Visual Anxiety Scale (1-10). Children will also be asked about their preferences and reasons in one or two sentences. Content analysis will be performed on answers to open-ended questions. Statistical analysis will be done using Fisher's Exact test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2025
CompletedMay 2, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.4 years
April 21, 2025
April 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Modified Children Perception test
After the each impression proscedure, to evaluate children's perspectives on the impression techniques, the perception questionnaire used in Burhardt's study was adapted for this research.5 The questionnaire was translated into Turkish to ensure cultural and linguistic appropriateness. The translated version underwent content validation through expert review to ensure its relevance and appropriateness for the target population. The perception questionnaire used in this study aimed to measure gag reflex, queasiness, difficulty to breathe, discomfort, time perception, stress, pain. Accordingly, 8 questions with 5-point Likert scale responses ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree" were included (Figure-1). Additionally, the Visual Anxiety Scale (VAS) was employed to measure overall discomfort. For the VAS results, children were asked to score their perceived discomfort on a scale from 0 (no discomfort) to 10 (extreme discomfort).
one year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Responses to open-ended questions
one year
Study Arms (1)
children aged between 5-11 who need space maintainer or orthodontic treatments
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Alginate impressions were obtained with an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material (Cavex Impressional; Cavex Holland, Haarlem, The Netherlands) and standard plastic trays. For each impression, the time required to mix the material and complete a full-mouth (maxillary and mandibular arches) impression was recorded.
Alginate impressions were obtained with an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material (Cavex Impressional; Cavex Holland, Haarlem, The Netherlands) and standard plastic trays. For each impression, the time required to mix the material and complete a full-mouth (maxillary and mandibular arches) impression was recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- No prior exposure to either digital or conventional impression techniques
- Absence of temporomandibular joint disorders and periodontal disease
- Cleft lip and/or palate, or other significant craniofacial anomalies
- No current use of psychiatric or neuropathic medications
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with a known history of dental anxiety or a pronounced gag reflex
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Uşak Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Usak University School of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Uşak, 64200, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Yilmaz H, Aydin MN. Digital versus conventional impression method in children: Comfort, preference and time. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019 Nov;29(6):728-735. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12566. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
PMID: 31348834BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2025
First Posted
April 29, 2025
Study Start
January 15, 2023
Primary Completion
June 15, 2024
Study Completion
October 15, 2024
Last Updated
May 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data includes personel data of the participants.