Immediate vs. Elective Endoscopic Removal of Large CBD Stones in High-Risk Elderly Patients
Immediate Versus Elective Endoscopic Removal of Large Common Bile Duct Stones in High-Risk Elderly Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different approaches for removing large or multiple stones from the common bile duct in older adults with chronic diseases. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is it better to remove the stones immediately during the first endoscopic procedure? Or is it safer and more effective to place a temporary plastic stent first and remove the stones later? Researchers will compare these two approaches to see which one leads to better stone clearance and fewer complications. Participants will: Undergo an endoscopic procedure (ERCP) to treat their bile duct stones. Be randomly assigned to either have immediate stone removal or have a stent placed first, with stone removal scheduled 8-12 weeks later. Attend follow-up visits to monitor their recovery and check for complications. This study is being conducted at the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2025
CompletedMay 6, 2025
January 1, 2025
2.1 years
April 21, 2025
May 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of complete stone clearance
complete removal of all detectable stones from the common bile duct without the need for additional procedures
One month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
ERCP-related adverse events
Three months
Study Arms (2)
Group A (Stent-first Approach)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A patients had a temporary plastic stent placed to facilitate bile drainage, with elective stone removal scheduled 8-12 weeks later.
Group B (Stone Retrieval-first Approach)
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn Group B, patients underwent immediate stone extraction attempts using conventional techniques such as basket, balloon, or mechanical lithotripsy as needed.
Interventions
A plastic stent was placed during the initial ERCP, with elective stone removal scheduled 8-12 weeks later.
Immediate ERCP for stone removal, utilizing conventional techniques such as basket, balloon, or mechanical lithotripsy as needed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 65 years
- Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 3
- Presence of large or multiple CBD stones (defined as ≥1 stone ≥15 mm or ≥3 stones each ≥10 mm on imaging)
- Ability to provide informed consent (or via legal representative).
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to ERCP or general anesthesia
- History of biliary surgery or altered anatomy
- Benign or malignant strictures of the distal CBD
- Intrahepatic bile duct stones
- Moderate to severe cholangitis
- Malignancy or serious condition with life expectancy \<6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt.
Shebeen El-Kom, Monufia Governorate, 32511, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Tonozuka R, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Tsuchiya T, Ishii K, Tsuji S, Ikeuchi N, Umeda J, Tanaka R, Honjyo M, Mukai S, Fujita M, Moriyasu F. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large bile duct stones in elderly patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Sep;59(9):2299-307. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3156-9. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
PMID: 24771320BACKGROUNDKim KH, Kim TN. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation for Removal of Large Bile Duct Stones in Advanced Age. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:6568989. doi: 10.1155/2016/6568989. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
PMID: 27812520BACKGROUNDYe X, Huai J, Sun X. Effectiveness and safety of biliary stenting in the management of difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;27(1):30-6. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.150305. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
PMID: 26674978BACKGROUNDMeng K, Zhang DY, Chen DX, Liu WJ, Fang KX, Chen S, Wu L, Li MY. Large common bile duct stones in high-risk elderly patients: Immediate endoscopic stone removal or elective stone removal? A single-center retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02976-0.
PMID: 37798726BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Omkolsoum Alhaddad, M.D.
National Liver Institute, Menoufia University Egypt.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Hepatology and Gastroenterology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2025
First Posted
April 29, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2022
Primary Completion
March 1, 2024
Study Completion
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share IPD for this study due to ethical and regulatory considerations, as well as the absence of a data-sharing infrastructure at our institution.