NCT06944964

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the feasibility of conducting a larger study comparing single implant fixation (SIF) and dual implant fixation (DIF) for treating distal femur fractures (DFF) in older or compromised adults. It will also evaluate the safety and effectiveness of these treatments. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can DIF improve patient outcomes compared to SIF in older or compromised adults?
  • How feasible is it to recruit and retain participants for this trial? Participants will:
  • Be randomly assigned to receive either SIF or DIF for their DFF treatment
  • Visit the clinic for follow-ups and assessments of their recovery and bone healing, including potential ultrasound imaging for detecting complications like non-union.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
49mo left

Started Sep 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress15%
Sep 2025May 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 4, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
3.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2030

Last Updated

September 15, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 9, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Single Implant FixationDual Implant FixationDual Plate FixationCombination nail-plate fixation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Feasibility Outcomes - Recruitment

    Recruitment - 1) Recruitment (number of patients enrolled per-month). Success will be considered as each site enrolling a minimum mean of 0.6 patients per-month. This is a conservative estimate based on our previous trials in similar populations, and we expect that each site will screen a minimum of twice this number. * Number of patients enrolled per month * Success if each site able to enroll mean of 0.6 patients per month

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  • Feasibility Outcomes - Retention

    Retention - (proportion of patients that complete one-year follow-up). Success will be considered a minimum of 85% of patients with complete one-year data. * Proportion of patients that complete 1 year follow up * Success: 85%

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

  • Functional Ability

    Via the validated Oxford Knee Score. It ranges from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating better outcomes (i.e., less pain and better function).

    2 year

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Pain rating

    2 years

  • Functional ability

    2 years

  • Weight-bearing

    2 years

  • Mobility

    3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

  • Health-related quality of life (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).

    2 years

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group A (Control): Single Implant Fixation (SIF)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this arm will undergo fixation of distal femur fractures using a single implant, which could be a lateral locked plate or a retrograde intramedullary nail.

Procedure: Single Implant Fixation (SIF)

Group B (Experimental): Dual Implant Fixation (DIF)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this arm will undergo fixation using dual implants, either dual plate fixation or a combination of nail and plate fixation.

Procedure: Dual Implant Fixation (DIF)

Interventions

This intervention involves using one implant for fracture fixation. The implant can be either a lateral locked plate or a retrograde intramedullary nail, based on the surgeon's preference.

Group A (Control): Single Implant Fixation (SIF)

This intervention involves using two implants for fracture fixation. The combination can be either dual plate fixation (DPF) or combination nail plate fixation (NPF) .

Group B (Experimental): Dual Implant Fixation (DIF)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Isolated DFF (native AO/OTA-type A2, A3, C or periprosthetic Lewis and
  • Rorabeck type 1, 2) and either:
  • Age ≥ 60 years or;
  • Age 18-60 years with one or more of:
  • i. Osteoporosis ii. Obesity (Body Mass Index \>30) iii. Metaphyseal comminution iv. Diabetes
  • Fracture amenable to plating and nailing
  • Ability to read and speak English or availability of a translator
  • Acute fractures (within 14-days of injury)
  • No surgeon preference regarding SIF vs. DIF
  • Provision of informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Candidate for primary or revision arthroplasty (surgeon opinion)
  • Periprosthetic fracture with loose implant
  • Gustillo grade III open fractures
  • Ipsilateral hip implant
  • Likely problems, in the judgment of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up (i.e., no fixed address, mentally competent to give consent, etc.)
  • Non-ambulatory patients
  • Multi-trauma patient (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16)
  • Lack of bone substance or poor bone-quality which, in the surgeon's judgment, makes fixation impossible
  • Any concomitant lower-extremity injury
  • Inability to obtain informed consent due to language barrier

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Fraser Orthopaedic Institute

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

NOT YET RECRUITING

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Femoral Fractures, Distal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Femoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesLeg Injuries

Central Study Contacts

Emil Schemitsch, MD, FRCS(C)

CONTACT

Abdel-Rahman Lawendy, MD, FRCS(C)

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A multi-centered, preliminary feasibility RCT across 4 level I trauma centers comparing SIF to DIF for DFFs. Participants are randomized into one of two groups, and each group receives a different intervention (Single Implant Fixation (SIF) or Dual Implant Fixation (DIF)).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2025

First Posted

April 25, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2030

Last Updated

September 15, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations