Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Electrolysis Therapy vs. Sham Electrolysis in Patients With Patellar Tendinopathy: A Prospective Randomized Study Including MRI and Shear-wave Ultrasound Elastography Imaging
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Electrolysis Therapy (USGET) vs. Sham USGET on Patients With Patellar Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Assessing the Effects on Pain, Function, and Tendon Structure Including MRI and Shear-wave Elastography Ultrasound Imaging
Other study identifiers
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
74
1 country
1
Study Start
October 29, 2024
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
July 31, 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
October 1, 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Brief Summary
Study Background and Purpose Tendinopathies are common and debilitating musculoskeletal disorders that often lead to chronic pain and reduced mobility. Traditional treatments face challenges due to limited tendon blood supply, leading to poor healing. This study investigates ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis therapy (USGET), which uses electric current to promote tendon healing, comparing its efficacy with a placebo. Objectives The primary goal is to assess pain reduction, while secondary goals evaluate functionality, elasticity, and morphological changes (imaging) in patients with patellar tendinopathy. Methodology
- Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
- Duration: 24 months (October 2024 - October 2026).
- Groups:
- Intervention Group: Electrolysis therapy with galvanic current, Progressive tendon-loading exercises.
- Control Group: Electrolysis placebo (without current), Progressive tendon-loading exercises.
- Sample Size: 74 subjects.
- Data Collection: Baseline, post-treatment (4 months), and follow-up (7 months). Evaluation and Data Analysis The study assesses pain via VAS and functionality scores, alongside imaging (MRI, sonography) to measure tendon morphology. Statistical analysis includes hypothesis testing and regression using SPSS software. Ethics and Publication Ethics approval is from the Bremen Medical Chamber. Results will be published regardless of outcome, following Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Registry Overview
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
- Recruitment status
- enrolling by invitation
- Estimated enrollment
- 74 participants
- Study completion date
October 1, 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
- Listed locations
- 1 countries · 1 sites
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Study Timeline
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
Study Start
October 29, 2024
Actual (reported)First Submitted
April 15, 2025
Actual (reported)First Posted
April 22, 2025
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
July 31, 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
October 1, 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
- Last Updated
- April 30, 2025
- Status Verified
- April 2025
- Last Update Submitted
- April 28, 2025