Comparison Between the I-gel and Protector Supraglottic Airway Devices
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the learning curves of two different laryngeal mask airway devices, by evaluating their placement in adult patients performed by anesthesiology residents
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2025
CompletedJune 27, 2025
April 1, 2025
5 months
April 14, 2025
June 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The time required for successful placement of the device
Measured from the moment the clinician picks up the LMA device after induction of general anesthesia until the appearance of the first capnography waveform on the monitor with a maximum duration of 60 seconds per attempt and up to three attempts allowed
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Documentation of adverse events during placement
During the placement attempt
Study Arms (2)
LMA Igel group
ACTIVE COMPARATORLMA Protector group
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
adults allocated to the LMA Igel group, an LMA Igel device will be inserted intraoperatively
adults allocated to the LMA Protector group, an LMA Protector device will be inserted intraoperatively
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-II
- Patients older than 18 years
- Procedures in supine and lithotomy position
You may not qualify if:
- Tumors or anatomical anomalies of the upper airway
- Known history of difficult intubation
- Limited mouth opening less than 2cm
- Decreased compliance of the lungs or the thoracic cage
- Need of mechanical ventilation after the surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SismanoglioGH
Athens, Attica, 15126, Greece
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiology Resident at Sismanoglio General Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2025
First Posted
April 22, 2025
Study Start
April 22, 2025
Primary Completion
September 15, 2025
Study Completion
September 15, 2025
Last Updated
June 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share