Wether VNS in Early Stage (3 Months) is Safe and More Beneficial for Post-stroke Motor Rehabilitation
The Comparison of Safety and Treatment Results Between Early (<6 Months) and Late (> 6 Months) Vagus Stimulation for Post-stroke Motor Rehabilitation: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Upper-extremity impairment after stroke remains a major therapeutic challenge and a target of neuromodulation treatment efforts. In previous study, Vagus nerve stimulation was constricted to patients 9 months after stroke. In this randomized phase I trial, we would apply vagus nerve stimulation in an early stage (\<6 month) and observe its theraputic effect on motor function after ischaemic Stroke.We hypothesized that the early stimulation could be safe and more beneficial compared to stimulation in late stage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 stroke
Started May 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
ExpectedApril 22, 2025
April 1, 2025
1 year
April 14, 2025
April 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
FM-UE scores between early and late VNS
The outcomes includes each participant's Fugl-Meyer assessment scale (FM-UE) scores for each monthly visit. FM-UE scores range from 0 to 100 and the higher scores indicated better outcome of movement.
12 months after device implantation
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) between early and late VNS
12 months after device implantation
the Nine-Hole Peg Test between early and late VNS
12 months after device implantation
the Bilateral Box and Block Test between early and late VNS
12 months after device implantation
Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) between early and late VNS
12 months after device implantation
the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) between early and late VNS
12 months after device implantation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
VNS activated in late stage
EXPERIMENTALFollowing enrollment, participants with a history of stroke greater than 6 months underwent 1 month of upper-extremity rehabilitation twice per week to rule out potential for recovery with rehabilitation therapy alone. Thereafter, each participant underwent surgical implantation of the VNS system. 1 months later, VNS was activated.
VNS activated in early stage
ACTIVE COMPARATORFollowing enrollment, participants with a history of stroke within 6 months underwent 1 month of upper-extremity rehabilitation twice per week to rule out potential for recovery with rehabilitation therapy alone. Thereafter, each participant underwent surgical implantation of the VNS system. 1 months later, VNS was activated.
VNS not activated in early stage
EXPERIMENTALFollowing enrollment, participants with a history of stroke within 6 months underwent 1 month of upper-extremity rehabilitation twice per week to rule out potential for recovery with rehabilitation therapy alone. Thereafter, each participant underwent surgical implantation of the VNS system.When the a history of stroke was exceeded over 6 months, VNS was activated.
Interventions
Device implantation was done under general anaesthesia. A horizontal neck crease incision was created left of the midline at the level of the cricoid cartilage. After the vagus nerve was identified, the stimulation lead was wrapped around the vagus nerve. The lead was then tunnelled subcutaneously to the pulse generator device which was contained in a subcutaneous pocket in the pectoral region.
Device implantation was done under general anaesthesia. A horizontal neck crease incision was created left of the midline at the level of the cricoid cartilage. After the vagus nerve was identified, the stimulation lead was wrapped around the vagus nerve. The lead was then tunnelled subcutaneously to the pulse generator device which was contained in a subcutaneous pocket in the pectoral region
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible individuals suffered a first-time, unilateral, ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory that spared the diencephalon and basal ganglia 3-36 months before surgery.
- Individuals with persistent moderate-to-severe upper-extremity hemiparesis as defined by an FM-UE score of ≤42
- Sufficient upper-extremity motor ability to engage in rehabilitation (that is, a score of ≥1 on the FM-UE elbow flexion, elbow extension or finger mass flexion or extension).
You may not qualify if:
- Excessive spasticity or contracture of the upper-extremity muscles (that is, Modified Ashworth Scale = 4) . Severe cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination \< 24)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, 250100, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2025
First Posted
April 22, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP