Deep Brain Stimulation of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus for Alzheimer's Disease
DBS-PPN-AD
A Pilot Clinical Trial Investigating Deep Brain Stimulation of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a brain disorder that gradually impacts cognitive functions such as memory, thinking, and daily functioning. Gamma oscillations are a type of brain activity thought to play a role in memory and cognition (thinking abilities). In AD, these oscillations are impaired - meaning they are smaller and slower than the brain waves observed in healthy individuals. Research suggests that enhancing these brain waves may help slow the progression of AD. This research is investigating a technique called deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) as an experimental intervention. An electrode will be implanted in the PPN and deliver mild stimulation over the course of a 12-month period. As a novel intervention, the priority of the study is to determine if DBS-PPN is a safe and feasible intervention for mild-AD. Additionally, the study investigators are evaluating whether DBS-PPN can increase natural gamma oscillations in ways that improve memory and cognition. The insights from this study will guide the design of an accessible larger trial to more definitively assess how effective DBS-PPN could be as a treatment for AD. Participants will:
- Undergo a 12-month experimental intervention involving DBS of the PPN. The procedure for implanting the DBS device takes approximately 2-3 hours under general anesthesia, followed by an overnight stay in the hospital for safety monitoring.
- Be required to attend regular appointments every 3 months from DBS implantation for the duration of the study. The follow-up visits will include safety and feasibility monitoring, brain scans (EEG and MEG), and cognitive assessments/questionnaires.
- Participants' caregiver will also complete questionnaires about their cognition, functioning, and overall health at the follow-up visits.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable alzheimer-disease
Started May 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable alzheimer-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2028
May 1, 2025
April 1, 2025
3.5 years
March 31, 2025
April 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Intervention Feasibility - Recruitment Rates
Determined by assessing recruitment trends. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies will be assessed by monitoring the rate at which eligible participants are enrolled.
Study Initiation to End of Study Enrolment Period (36 month period)
Intervention Feasibility - Adherence to Study Protocol
To ensure procedural consistency across participants, adherence to the study protocol will be systematically monitored. Any protocol deviations will be documented and evaluated for their potential impact on study outcomes, ensuring the reliability and reproducibility of findings
Study Initiation to Final Participant Study Completion (3 years)
Intervention Feasibility - Attrition Rates
Participant retention will be assessed through an analysis of attrition rates, with particular attention to identifying the causes of dropout.
Study Initiation to Final Participant Study Completion by (3 years)
Intervention Feasibility - Participant Evaluation of Intervention
Exit interviews will be conducted with participants and their caregivers to gather quantitative and qualitative information on their subjective experience and evaluation of the study intervention. Quantitative feedback on six items assessing satisfaction (e.g., understanding of study protocol, follow-up schedule manageability, likelihood of participating in future studies with same procedure) are measured on a a 5-point Likert scale (1 - "Very Dissatisfied" to 5 - "Very Satisfied"). Total score on quantitative items ranges from 6 - 30, with a higher score representing a more positive participant and caregiver evaluation of the study intervention.
Participants will complete the exit interview at the final follow-up visit (month 12).
Intervention Safety - Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Possible adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), or unanticipated problems related to the DBS device, related surgery and/or stimulation will be closely monitored and managed as per standard of care and definitions and classifications set forth in the following subsections. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational devices or procedures. An SAE is an event that: Led to death; Led to serious deterioration in the health of the subject Led to foetal distress, foetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect Could have led to death or a serious deterioration were it to recur.
Assessed at DBS implantation (Month 0) and at regular follow-up visits 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post-DBS surgery.
Intervention Safety - AE Severity
All AEs will be assessed by the study team using The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (November 27, 2019) grading system. For AEs not included in the CTCAE defined grading system, the following guidelines will be used to describe severity: Grade 1, Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2, Moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age- appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL)\*; Grade 3, Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL\*\*; Grade 4, Life-threatening consequence; urgent intervention indicated; or Grade 5, Death related to AE.
Assessed at DBS implantation (Month 0) and at regular follow-up visits 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post-DBS surgery.
Intervention Safety - AE Relationship to Study Intervention
Team will determine AE's causality based on categories below: Definitely Related - There is clear evidence to suggest a causal relationship, and other possible contributing factors can be ruled out. Probably Related - There is evidence to suggest a causal relationship, and the influence of other factors is unlikely. Possibly Related - There is some evidence to suggest a causal relationship (e.g., the event occurred within a reasonable time. However, other factors may have contributed to the event (e.g., the participant's clinical condition, other concomitant events). Unlikely to be related - A clinical event whose temporal relationship to implantation/use of the study device makes a causal relationship improbable and in which other drugs, devices or underlying disease provides plausible explanations. Not Related - The AE is completely independent of implantation/use of the study device, and/or evidence exists that the event is definitely related to another etiology.
Assessed at DBS implantation (Month 0) and at regular follow-up visits 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post-DBS surgery.
Intervention Safety - AE Outcome
The outcome of the AE will be defined according to the following: Recovered/ Resolved: The event has fully resolved at the end of the study\*; Recovering/ Resolving: The event is improving but has not fully resolved at the end of the study\*; Recovered/ Resolved with sequelae: The event has resolved, but retained pathological conditions resulting from the prior disease or injury; Not recovered/ not resolved: The event is ongoing at the end of the study\*; Fatal: This event is determined to be the cause of death; and Unknown: Outcome information could not be obtained.
Assessed at final follow-up visit 12-months post-DBS surgery, or at the last time of observation.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Gamma Oscillation (GO) Power and Synchrony
Baseline before DBS surgery and at 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post-DBS surgery.
Theta-Gamma Coupling During N-Back Memory Task
Baseline before DBS surgery and at 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post-DBS surgery.
Working Memory Performance on N-Back Memory Task
Baseline before DBS surgery and at 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post-DBS surgery.
Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)
Baseline before DBS surgery and at 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post-DBS surgery.
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog):
Baseline before DBS surgery and at 3-months, 6-months, 9-months, and 12-months post-DBS surgery.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental intervention employs deep brain stimulation (DBS), a neuromodulation therapy involving the precise application of electrical impulses to targeted brain regions (the PPN) to modulate neural activity. The study intervention will span 12 months, with key milestones including DBS-PPN implantation, DBS activation and initial programming, and follow-up assessments at 3-month intervals. These follow-up visits will assess safety, feasibility, electrographic measures, and cognitive outcomes. All patient participants will receive the experimental intervention. This is the only arm in this study.
Interventions
The DBS implantation procedure targeting the PPN involves a neurosurgical operation performed under general anesthesia. During the procedure, thin electrodes are implanted in the PPN with the aid of advanced pre-operative imaging (MRI and CT scan) to confirm precise targeting. This device generates and transmits electrical impulses to the PPN, which can be adjusted to optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults over 60 years old.
- Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease: Satisfied the diagnostic criteria of the National Institute of Aging - Alzheimer's Association criteria for probable AD.
- Clinical dementia rating scale global score of ≤ 1.
- Not taking an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and/or memantine, or taking a stable dose for at least six months.
- Fluent in English.
- Caregiver available to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Pre-existing structural brain abnormalities (e.g., significant white matter disease, tumor, infarction, or intracranial hematoma).
- Other neurologic or psychiatric diagnoses, or medical comorbidities that would preclude patients from undergoing surgery.
- Non-fluent in English (it will be very difficult to conduct standard cognitive tests in English on non-fluent English speakers. In addition, language barrier is significant hurdle in providing standard care with communication and cognition being a main outcome measure).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Health Network, Torontolead
- Alzheimer Society of Canadacollaborator
- Brain Canadacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Taufik A. Valiante, MD PhD FRCS
University Health Network, Toronto
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Director of Surgical Epilepsy Program, Senior Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2025
First Posted
April 20, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2028
Last Updated
May 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share