NCT06934876

Brief Summary

This study will compare the sensitivity and specificity of waveform capnography versus colorimetric carbon dioxide detection to identify tracheal placement of the endotracheal tube during intubation of critically ill adults.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,332

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
8mo left

Started Apr 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress62%
Apr 2025Jan 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 11, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 21, 2025

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2027

Last Updated

November 4, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

April 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

October 31, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

tracheal intubationemergency intubationwaveform capnographyend-tidal CO2exhaled carbon dioxidecolorimetric detection of exhaled carbon dioxide

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity of the test of exhaled carbon dioxide to detect a endotracheal tube positioned in the trachea.

    The co-primary endpoints are the sensitivity and specificity of each test (against the reference standard) to accurately detect the tube location. The sensitivity of each CO2 detection method describes the probability that the CO2 detection method is consistent with a tube location in the trachea for a patient who has an endotracheal tube located inside the trachea. The co-primary outcomes are a direct comparison of the sensitivity and specificity between the two index tests using McNemar's test with a two-sided P value with a significance level of 0.05. The McNemar's test is well-suited to paired data where both diagnostic tests are applied to the same patients. We will also present the absolute between-group difference with 95% confidence intervals.

    From intubation until 7 breaths from the ventilator are delivered, approximately 1 minute

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Specificity of the test of exhaled carbon dioxide to detect a endotracheal tube positioned outside of the trachea.

    From intubation until 7 breaths from the ventilator are delivered, approximately 1 minute

Study Arms (1)

Critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation

Adult patients who are undergoing emergency intubation in the ED and ICU

Diagnostic Test: Colorimetric carbon dioxide (CO2) detectionDiagnostic Test: Waveform capnography

Interventions

All patients will undergo colorimetric carbon dioxide (CO2) detection. The reading will be assessed by a clinician at the bedside who will answer yes or no to the following question, asked after 7 breaths have been delivered following intubation: "Is the color change consistent with a tube located in the trachea?"

Critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation
Waveform capnographyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

All patients will undergo waveform capnography. The reading will be assessed by a clinician at the bedside who will answer yes or no to the following question, asked after 7 breaths have been delivered following intubation: " Is the waveform consistent with a tube located in the trachea?"

Critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Critically ill adult patients undergoing emergency intubation

You may qualify if:

  • Patient is located in a participating unit (ED or ICU)
  • Patient is undergoing tracheal intubation.
  • The clinician intends to use an exhaled CO2 detection device to confirm tracheal placement of the tube.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient is known to be a prisoner
  • Patient is known to be \< 18 years old
  • A responsible clinician has determined that sole use of either waveform capnography or colorimetric testing is required for optimal care of the patient.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Lahey Hospital & Medical Center

Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States

RECRUITING

Hennepin Healthcare

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415, United States

RECRUITING

Duke University School of Medicine

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

Wake Forest School of Medicine

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

RECRUITING

The Ohio State University College of Medicine

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

RECRUITING

Oregon Health and Sciences University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Brian Driver, MD

CONTACT

Matthew Prekker, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Co-Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2025

First Posted

April 18, 2025

Study Start

April 21, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Last Updated

November 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The authors will share the full de-identified dataset beginning 12 months after publication until 48 months after publication for researchers testing a hypothesis outlined in an institutional review board approved protocol. These data can be accessed by emailing the corresponding author. A signed data access agreement will be required.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
From 12 months after publication until 48 months after publication
Access Criteria
Researchers testing a hypothesis outlined in an institutional review board approved protocol can access the full de-identified dataset. These data can be accessed by emailing the corresponding author. A signed data access agreement will be required.

Locations