NCT06934265

Brief Summary

This study compares how well voice therapy works when delivered in-person versus through telehealth for older adults with age-related voice problems. Researchers are testing whether Phonation Resistance Training Exercises (PhoRTE®) can be just as effective when delivered remotely as when done face-to-face, which could make treatment more accessible and affordable for seniors. The two primary hypotheses are:

  • Changes in voice function
  • Patient reports about their voice
  • Scientific measurements of voice quality
  • Patient satisfaction with treatment
  • Impact on quality of life The results will help determine if telehealth can be a good alternative to in-person voice therapy, especially important as telehealth coverage may be changing.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Jan 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress38%
Jan 2026Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 11, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 25, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 25, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 25, 2026

Last Updated

January 13, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

March 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Vocal fold atrophyvoice therapypresbyphoniaaging voicevoice rehabilitationspeech pathologyInterventionvoiceaging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Voice Handicap Index-10

    5 point likert scale to assess voice-related quality of life impairment, where 0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = almost always, 4 = always. 10 questions in total. Higher score indicates a greater voice handicap. Score of \>11 is considered abnormal. Measure will be collected at initial evaluation (baseline) and again following intervention (final evaluation).

    up to 16 weeks

  • Aging Voice Index

    AVI Score at Baseline and re-evaluation. The Aging Voice Index (AVI) is a validated instrument that measures quality of life in older adults with voice disorders. A higher score indicates worse quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 92.

    up to 16 weeks

  • Voice Problem Impact Scales

    A validated self assessment questionnaire in which the participant self-rates impact of voice on four domains of life on 1-7 likert scales (1. work/daily activities, 2. social life, 3. home life, 4. life overall.) Numbers are presented in equally appearing intervals with end anchors where 1=not at all affected and 7=profoundly. A higher score indicates higher degree of impact. Measure will be collected at initial evaluation (baseline) and again following intervention (final evaluation).

    up to 16 weeks

  • Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)

    A validated auditory/perceptual voice quality and severity assessment tool to be used pre- and post-intervention. Blinded independent expert clinicians, identified as SLPs who have 5+ years of experience in the assessment and treatment of patients with voice disorders and who currently maintain a caseload of at least 80% voice patients, will assess recorded voice samples to describe participant voice quality and severity using the CAPE-V. Measure will be collected at initial evaluation (baseline) and again following intervention (final evaluation).

    up to 16 weeks

  • OMNI Vocal Effort Scale

    Visual analog scale for patient-perceived vocal effort on a 0-10 scale where 0=extremely easy and 10=extremely hard. Patient is asked for perception of current voice effort during assessment and highest effort level experienced.

    up to 16 weeks

  • Acoustic Assessment: voicing intensity

    Acoustic measure in sustained voicing via mean intensity (in dB SPL) and its standard deviation across a. standardized vowel /a/, b. standardized reading passage (Rainbow passage), and c. running, conversational speech. Measure will be collected at initial evaluation (baseline) and again following intervention (final evaluation).

    up to 16 weeks

  • Acoustic Assessment: Cepstral Peak Prominence

    Acoustic measure in sustained voicing using Cepstral Peak Prominence and its standard deviation while reading a standardized passage (Rainbow passage). Measure will be collected at initial evaluation (baseline) and again following intervention (final evaluation).

    up to 16 weeks

  • Aerodynamic Measurement: phonatory airflow during speech

    Airflow during voicing will be measured at baseline and again at final evaluation using the Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600 (PAS; PENTAX Medical). Assessment includes flow during voicing across a. sustained vowel /a/ and running speech (first four sentences of standardized Rainbow Passage). The PAS reports airflow during voicing using a pneumotach with integrated facemask and external microphone. During voicing, pressure transducers on either side of the terminal collects and converts the air flow across time to determine airflow rate. The microphone captures the acoustic signal according to terminal-specific standardized calibration. Subjects maintain upright seated posture with the face mask firmly pressed to their face, ensuring an airtight seal over oral and nasal cavities during this task.

    up to 16 weeks

  • Aerodynamic Measurement: subglottal pressure

    Subglottal pressure (Psub) will be measured at initial evaluation (baseline) and again at the conclusion of therapeutic intervention (final evaluation) using the Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600 (PAS; PENTAX Medical). Assessment utilizes the valid labial interruption task via /pipipi/ syllable production task. The PAS collects intraoral pressure, which is a validated, non-invasive approximate to subglottal pressure. The participant thens produce the sequence at a comfortable pitch and loudness. Analysis then extracts the subglottal pressure by measuring airflow and intraoral pressure during speech.

    up to 16 weeks

  • Aerodynamic Measurement: phonation threshold pressure

    Phonation threshold pressure (PTP) will be measured at initial evaluation (baseline) and again at the conclusion of therapeutic intervention (final evaluation) using the Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600 (PAS; PENTAX Medical). Assessment utilizes the valid labial interruption task via /pipipi/ syllable production. PTP is the minimum subglottal pressure required to initiate and sustain vocal fold oscillation. The PAS collects intraoral pressure, which is a validated, non-invasive approximate to subglottal pressure. The participant thens produces the sequence at their softest vocal intensity. Analysis extracts the PTP by measuring the relationship between airflow and intraoral pressure at softest possible voicing.

    up to 16 weeks

  • Aerodynamic Measurement: number of breaths

    mean number of breaths across a standardized reading passage (The Rainbow Passage) collected at baseline (initial evaluation) and once again after intervention (final evaluation).

    up to 16 weeks

  • duration across standardized reading passage

    mean duration (in seconds) to complete the reading of a standard passage (The Rainbow Passage).

    up to 16 weeks

Study Arms (2)

PhoRTE - IP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

PhoRTE® voice therapy will be administered to this treatment arm in-person (IP)(traditional therapy).

Behavioral: exuberant voice therapy

PhoRTE - TH

EXPERIMENTAL

Study participants who will be receiving intervention via telehealth. Intervention administered will be PhoRTE® voice therapy.

Behavioral: exuberant voice therapy

Interventions

exuberant voice therapy validated for patients with age-related voice changes (i.e., vocal fold atrophy, presbyphonia)

Also known as: Phonation Resistance Training Exercises (PhoRTE®)
PhoRTE - IPPhoRTE - TH

Eligibility Criteria

Age54 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults 55+ with a primary diagnosis of presbyphonia, age-related voice changes, and/or vocal fold atrophy with or without localized loss of lamina propria (e.g. vocal fold scar)
  • Telehealth-capable device (e.g., tablet, computer) with microphone, speaker, camera, high-speed internet
  • Ability to attend four telehealth or in-person sessions for four consecutive sessions
  • Ability to attend two in-person evaluation sessions (pre- and post-treatment)

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of localized masses, lesions, or vocal fold motion impairments identified during videostroboscopy at initial evaluation
  • Progressive neurologic conditions, e.g. Parkinson's disease (PD), Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), etc.
  • Previous attendance to exuberant voice therapy (e.g., PhoRTE, Lee Silverman Voice Treatment)
  • Untreated hearing loss
  • Non-English speakers

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

USC Voice Center

Arcadia, California, 91007, United States

Location

USC Voice Center

Beverly Hills, California, 90211, United States

Location

USC Voice Center

Glendale, California, 91204, United States

Location

USC Voice Center

Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Shoffel-Havakuk H, Marks KL, Morton M, Johns MM 3rd, Hapner ER. Validation of the OMNI vocal effort scale in the treatment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Laryngoscope. 2019 Feb;129(2):448-453. doi: 10.1002/lary.27430. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

    PMID: 30315575BACKGROUND
  • Galluzzi F, Garavello W. The aging voice: a systematic review of presbyphonia. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018 Oct;9(5):559-570. doi: 10.1007/s41999-018-0095-6. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

    PMID: 34654233BACKGROUND
  • Desjardins M, Halstead L, Simpson A, Flume P, Bonilha HS. Respiratory Muscle Strength Training to Improve Vocal Function in Patients with Presbyphonia. J Voice. 2022 May;36(3):344-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

    PMID: 32680804BACKGROUND
  • Lindstrom E, Ohlund Wistbacka G, Lotvall A, Rydell R, Lyberg Ahlander V. How older adults relate to their own voices: a qualitative study of subjective experiences of the aging voice. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2023 Dec;48(4):163-171. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2022.2056243. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

    PMID: 35446741BACKGROUND
  • Ziegler A, Verdolini Abbott K, Johns M, Klein A, Hapner ER. Preliminary data on two voice therapy interventions in the treatment of presbyphonia. Laryngoscope. 2014 Aug;124(8):1869-76. doi: 10.1002/lary.24548. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

    PMID: 24375313BACKGROUND
  • Guglani I, Sanskriti S, Joshi SH, Anjankar A. Speech-Language Therapy Through Telepractice During COVID-19 and Its Way Forward: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2023 Sep 6;15(9):e44808. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44808. eCollection 2023 Sep.

    PMID: 37809138BACKGROUND
  • Griffin M, Bentley J, Shanks J, Wood C. The effectiveness of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment therapy issued interactively through an iPad device: A non-inferiority study. J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Apr;24(3):209-215. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17691865. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

    PMID: 28147896BACKGROUND
  • Theodoros DG, Hill AJ, Russell TG. Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes of Speech Treatment for Parkinson's Disease Delivered to the Home Via Telerehabilitation: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 May 1;25(2):214-32. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-15-0005.

    PMID: 27145396BACKGROUND
  • Titze IR, Palaparthi A, Cox K, Stark A, Maxfield L, Manternach B. Vocalization with semi-occluded airways is favorable for optimizing sound production. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 29;17(3):e1008744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008744. eCollection 2021 Mar.

    PMID: 33780433BACKGROUND
  • Belsky MA, Shelly S, Rothenberger SD, Ziegler A, Hoffman B, Hapner ER, Gartner-Schmidt JL, Gillespie AI. Phonation Resistance Training Exercises (PhoRTE) With and Without Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST) For Patients With Presbyphonia: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial. J Voice. 2023 May;37(3):398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.015. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

    PMID: 33741235BACKGROUND
  • Kempster GB, Gerratt BR, Verdolini Abbott K, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Hillman RE. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009 May;18(2):124-32. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017). Epub 2008 Oct 16.

    PMID: 18930908BACKGROUND
  • Castro ME, Sund LT, Hoffman MR, Hapner ER. The Voice Problem Impact Scales (VPIS). J Voice. 2024 May;38(3):666-673. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Dec 20.

    PMID: 34933795BACKGROUND
  • Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004 Sep;114(9):1549-56. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009.

    PMID: 15475780BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DysphoniaVoice DisordersCommunication Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Laryngeal DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Aaron Rothbart, PhD

    University of Southern California

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Alexandra Chace Purdy, BM, MA

CONTACT

M. Eugenia Castro, MS CCC-SLP

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
CAPE-V audio sample listeners will be blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Each group will get the same intervention; however, delivery method will differ (in-person vs telehealth-delivered)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (Clinician Educator)

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2025

First Posted

April 18, 2025

Study Start

January 25, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 25, 2026

Last Updated

January 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The number of resources and collaboration to collect and analyze the data is not feasible for the current research question and current available time and funding.

Locations