Iris Suture Fixation vs Iris Claw for Correction of Aphakia
IOLs
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evaluate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of iris suture fixation versus iris claw of posterior chamber IOLs
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2025
CompletedApril 18, 2025
April 1, 2025
8 months
April 11, 2025
April 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
BCVA in logMAR , to evaluate and compare visual recovery between the iris-claw and iris suture-fixated IOL groups.
at 6 months postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Group A (Iris claw IOL)
ACTIVE COMPARATORincluded 25 eyes in which the iris claw lens was used, the lens used in this study was the Artisan aphakia IOL (Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) which is a PMMA IOL with an 8.5 mm length, 1.04-mm maximum height and 5.4-mm optical zone width.
Group B (Iris fixation IOL)
ACTIVE COMPARATORincluded 25 eyes were subjected to iris fixation of posterior chamber foldable IOLs. eyes in which a single piece PMMA IOL was implanted. The IOL is 6 mm optic, 12.75 mm overall diameter, and has one eyelet for suture fixation in each haptic. A constant was 118.2.
Interventions
Aphakic eyes underwent secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using one of two techniques. In Group A, an iris-claw IOL (Artisan aphakia IOL, Ophtec BV, The Netherlands) was implanted and fixated to the mid-peripheral iris via enclavation. In Group B, a posterior chamber foldable PMMA IOL was fixated to the iris using transscleral sutures passed through eyelets in the haptics. All procedures were performed under peribulbar anesthesia using standard aseptic technique, and postoperative management included topical antibiotics and corticosteroids.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Surgical aphakia with no capsular support, with CDVA 4/60 or better on Snellen chart including: Aphakic eyes after complicated cataract surgery, crystalline lens subluxation (Marfan syndrome, pseudoexofoliation syndrome or trauma), 2nd intervention in traumatized eyes, cases with sublaxated or dislocated IOLs.
You may not qualify if:
- Surgical aphakia with decompensated corneas, aphakic patients with posterior segment pathologies like cystoid macular edema, choroidal neovascular membrane, aphakic patients with insufficient iris tissue, and rubeosis iridis, aphakic patients with intractable glaucoma.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Benha Universitylead
- Al-Azhar Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ebsar Eye Center
Cairo, 4450113, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ehab Saad, Lecturer
Benha University, Ebsar Eye Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2025
First Posted
April 18, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
November 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04