UNCPM 22322 - Adaption of the Transition of Care Model for Post-Discharge HIV-NCD Care in Lilongwe, Malawi - MLATHO
MLATHO
2 other identifiers
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an implementation research study that will adapt and pilot test the Transitional Of Care Model (TCM), originally conceived and developed in the USA, for targeted use as a post-discharge intervention for adults hospitalized with comorbid HIV and NCDs in Malawi using a mixed methods approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hiv
Started May 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 12, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2027
June 18, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.8 years
April 14, 2025
June 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Post-discharge home visits
Proportion of discharged participants who have a home visit by a nurse within 1 week of discharge
Through 3-months post-discharge
Completion of comprehensive needs assessment
Proportion of participants who have an assessment of social support, food insecurity, medication adherence self-efficacy during hospitalization or within 1 week of discharge
Through 3-months post-discharge
Feasibility rating from health worker perspective.
Feasibility of intervention measure (FIM) score among health workers involved in the implementation of the post-discharge intervention.The FIM is a 4-item/ statement measure 1. The post-discharge intervention program seems implementable in our setting 2. The post-discharge intervention seems possible in our setting 3. The post-discharge intervention seems doable in our setting 4. The post-discharge intervention seems easy to use for our setting The FIM is measured on a five-point rating scale:( 1= completely disagree, 2= disagree,3=neither agree nor disagree, 4= agree, and 5 = completely agree) The mean score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating the least feasibility and 5 indicating the most feasibility.
At 3 months post-discharge
Feasibility rating from patient and caregiver perspective
Feasibility of implementation measure (FIM) score among patients and caregivers who were assigned to receive the post-discharge intervention.The FIM is a 4-item/ statement measure 1. The post-discharge intervention program seems implementable in our setting 2. The post-discharge intervention seems possible in our setting 3. The post-discharge intervention seems doable in our setting 4. The post-discharge intervention seems easy to use for our setting The FIM is measured on a five-point rating scale:( 1= completely disagree, 2= disagree,3=neither agree nor disagree, 4= agree, and 5 = completely agree) The mean score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating the least feasibility and 5 the most feasibility.
At 3 months post-discharge
Reach among eligible hospitalized adults with HIV/NCD comorbidity
Proportion of eligible adults admitted with HIV/NCD comorbidity who participate in the study during the enrollment period
At completion of enrollment
Acceptability of Intervention Measures(AIM) rating from patient and caregiver perspective
The AIM is a 4-item/ statement measure 1. The post-discharge intervention implementation program meets my approval 2. The post-discharge intervention is appealing to me 3. I like the post-discharge intervention 4. I welcome the post-discharge intervention The AIM is measured on a five-point rating scale:( 1= completely disagree, 2= disagree,3=neither agree nor disagree, 4= agree, and 5 = completely agree) The mean score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poorly acceptable and five highly acceptable
At 3 months post-discharge
Acceptability of Intervention Measures(AIM) rating from Healthcare Workers perspective
The AIM is a 4-item/ statement measure 1. The post-discharge intervention implementation program meets my approval 2. The post-discharge intervention is appealing to me 3. I like the post-discharge intervention 4. I welcome the post-discharge intervention The AIM is measured on a five-point rating scale:( 1= completely disagree, 2= disagree,3=neither agree nor disagree, 4= agree, and 5 = completely agree) The mean score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poorly acceptable and 5 highly acceptable.
At 3 months post-discharge
Intervention Appropriateness Measure(IAM) rating from Healthcare Workers perspective
The IAM is a 4-item/ statement measure 1. The post-discharge intervention program seems fitting in our setting 2. The post-discharge intervention seems suitable for our setting 3. The post-discharge intervention seems applicable to our setting 4. The post-discharge intervention seems a good match in our setting The IAM is measured on a five-point rating scale:( 1= completely disagree, 2= disagree,3=neither agree nor disagree, 4= agree, and 5 = completely agree) The mean score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating the least appropriate and 5 the most appropriate
At 3 months post-discharge
Intervention Appropriateness Measure(IAM) rating for patient and caregiver
The IAM is a 4-item/ statement measure 1. The post-discharge intervention program seems fitting in our setting 2. The post-discharge intervention seems suitable for our setting 3. The post-discharge intervention seems applicable to our setting 4. The post-discharge intervention seems a good match in our setting The IAM is measured on a five-point rating scale:( 1= completely disagree, 2= disagree,3=neither agree nor disagree, 4= agree, and 5 = completely agree) The mean score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating the least appropriate and 5 the most appropriate.
At 3 months post-discharge
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The number of participants re-hospitalization after discharge
Through 3 months post-discharge
Dual control of HIV and hypertension
At 3 months post-discharge
Dual control of HIV and diabetes
At 3 months post-discharge
Control of hypertension
At 3 months post-discharge
Control of diabetes
At 3 months post-discharge
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Transition of Care Model (TCM)
EXPERIMENTALFollowing hospitalization for comorbid HIV and non-communicable diseases, participants will be followed for 3 months post discharge using the adopted Transition of Care Model (TCM).
Interventions
Key components of the TCM include discharge assessment, care planning, provider communication with outpatient follow-up teams, and community-based follow-up
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- living with HIV
- admitted to internal medicine
- has at least a cardiometabolic NCO as the primary or secondary reason for admission based on the HIV inpatient consultation
You may not qualify if:
- patients living beyond Lilongwe urban
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kamuzu Central Hospital
Lilongwe, Malawi
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cecilia Kanyama, MBBS
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Project Malawi)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2025
First Posted
April 17, 2025
Study Start
May 12, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Last Updated
June 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC. More information provided by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill