NCT06925490

Brief Summary

The present study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy using 3Mixtatin versus pulpectomy using Metapex in primary molars with irreversible pulpitis in children aged 4 to 9 years.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
5mo left

Started Jun 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress70%
Jun 2025Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 6, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 13, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2025

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 27, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

April 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

3Mixtatinirreversible pulpitismetapexpulpectomypulpotomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical success

    * Pain to percussion will be assessed by applying a light-tapping force to the relevant tooth using the blunt end of the dental probe. Tapping will be applied as gently as possible from a 1 cm distance, either present or absent. * Swelling will be assessed through clinical examination, either present or absent. * The sinus tract or fistula will be assessed through clinical examination, either present or absent. * The mobility of teeth will be assessed by applying pressure to the ends of two metal instruments, either present or absent. * The principal investigator and the co-supervisor will undertake this clinical assessment on every recall visit during the 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up period.

    3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up period

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Radiographic Success

    6 and 12 months

  • Post operative pain

    1 week, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Study Arms (2)

metapex pulpectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Single-visit pulpectomy using Metapex, . Calcium hydroxide-iodoform mixture (Metapex) is an ideal pulpal filling material for primary teeth.

Drug: Metapex

3Mixtatin Pulpotomy

EXPERIMENTAL

pulpotomy with 3 mixtatin (triple antibiotic paste of (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin mixed with simvastatin ) applied in the vital pulp therapy

Drug: 3Mixtatin

Interventions

Pulpectomy using Metapex

metapex pulpectomy

pulpotomy treatment when applying 3mixture of antibiotic (Metronidazole, cefixime, and Ciprofloxacin) along with simvastatin

3Mixtatin Pulpotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 9 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children aged from 4 to 9 years with vital primary molars showing signs of irreversible pulpitis.
  • Children with spontaneous pain lasting a few seconds to several hours.
  • Pain is intensified by thermal stimulus and persists after its removal.
  • Pulp hemorrhage after performing access cavity and deroofing of pulp chamber showing reddish pink healthy pulp tissue.
  • Radicular pulp health is verified by achieving hemostasis within eight minutes of compression using a cotton pellet with 5% sodium hypochlorite.
  • Absence of peri-apical or inter-radicular radiolucency, widening of periodontal ligament space, internal or external root resorption.

You may not qualify if:

  • Unrestorable primary molars.
  • Primary molars with uncontrolled pulp hemorrhage or pulp necrosis.
  • Medically compromised patients who have systemic disease.
  • Uncooperative children who refuse treatment.
  • Children whose parents are unwilling to place stainless steel crowns.
  • Children whose parents or caregivers refuse to participate in the study or are unable to attend follow-up visits.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Pulp Diseases

Interventions

Metapex

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Osama Ibrahim El Shahawy, Professor

    Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Marwa Aly Fouad, Associate professor

    Associate Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Nora Mohamed Mosaad, PHD researcher

CONTACT

Marwa Aly Fouad, Associate Professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Pedodontist, Cairo University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2025

First Posted

April 13, 2025

Study Start

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 27, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share