Recovery Optimization Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Injuries in Soccer Players
1 other identifier
interventional
25
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if recovery interventions using cold and hot water immersion can reduce the risk of injuries in amateur soccer players. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do cold water immersions reduce muscle fatigue and improve performance more effectively than hot water immersions? What is the optimal timing and duration for these recovery interventions to maximize their effectiveness? Researchers will compare: Cold Water Immersion (CWI) Hot Water Immersion (HWI) No Immersion (NI) Thermographic Immersion (TI) based on individual thermal profiles Participants will: Undergo thermographic assessments to determine their thermal profiles. Perform physical tests such as isometric strength tests, countermovement jumps (CMJ), and squats with 50% body weight. Complete wellness questionnaires to assess their subjective recovery and fatigue levels. Provide blood and urine samples for biomarker analysis. Participate in recovery interventions (CWI, HWI, or TI) based on their assigned group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedApril 10, 2025
April 1, 2025
1 month
March 20, 2025
April 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Muscle Fatigue Reduction:
Evaluated through changes in biomarkers such as creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and myoglobin levels, measured at multiple time points (pre- and post-intervention).
From pre-intervention to 48 hours post-intervention
Countermovement Jump (CMJ) test
Assessed using the countermovement jump (CMJ) test (cm)
From pre-intervention to 48 hours post-intervention.
Isometric Strenght Test (Hamstrings)
Assessed using isometric strength tests for the hamstrings (N)
From pre-intervention to 48 hours post-intervention.
Isometric Strenght Test (Adductor)
Assessed using isometric strength tests for the adductors (N)
From pre-intervention to 48 hours post-intervention.
Squat Performance
Assessed using squat performance with 50% body weight (reps)
From pre-intervention to 48 hours post-intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Perceived Recovery
At 24 and 48 hours post-intervention.
Stress Levels
At 24 and 48 hours post-intervention.
Fatigue
At 24 and 48 hours post-intervention.
Muscle Soreness
At 24 and 48 hours post-intervention.
Sleep Quality
At 24 and 48 hours post-intervention.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Injury Risk Assessment
From baseline (enrollment) to 24 weeks post-intervention.
Concentration of 3-Methylhistidine in Urine
From pre-intervention to 48 hours post-intervention.
Study Arms (4)
Cold Water Immersion (CWI)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undergo five intermittent immersions of 2 minutes each in cold water (11°C), with 2-minute rest periods in between.
Hot Water Immersion (HWI)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undergo a continuous immersion of 18 minutes in hot water (38°C).
No Immersion (NI)
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants follow the same protocol structure without any immersion.
Thermography-Guided Immersion (TI)
EXPERIMENTALBased on thermographic assessments, participants with a hypothermic profile (decreased temperature) receive hot water immersion, while those with a hyperthermic profile (increased temperature) receive cold water immersion.
Interventions
Participants undergo five intermittent immersions of 2 minutes each in cold water (11°C), with 2-minute rest periods in between.
Participants undergo a continuous immersion of 18 minutes in hot water (38°C)
Based on thermographic assessments, participants with a hypothermic profile (decreased temperature) receive hot water immersion, while those with a hyperthermic profile (increased temperature) receive cold water immersion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: Participants must be adults (18 years or older). Gender: Both male and female participants are eligible. Sport: Participants must be amateur football players. Team Membership: Participants must be members of a football team in the Castilla-La Mancha regional category.
- Consent: Participants must provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
- Health: Participants must be in good general health, with no chronic illnesses or conditions that would contraindicate participation in physical activity or water immersion.
You may not qualify if:
- Injury: Participants who have sustained an injury that prevents them from participating in football activities for at least two weeks during any of the study blocks.
- Medical Conditions: Participants with medical conditions that contraindicate water immersion (e.g., severe cardiovascular conditions, open wounds, skin infections).
- Withdrawal: Participants who choose to withdraw from the study at any point. Non-compliance: Participants who do not comply with the study protocol or fail to attend scheduled sessions.
- Pregnancy: Female participants who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Lorenzo Calvo J, Alorda-Capo F, Pareja-Galeano H, Jimenez SL. Influence of Nitrate Supplementation on Endurance Cyclic Sports Performance: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2020 Jun 17;12(6):1796. doi: 10.3390/nu12061796.
PMID: 32560317BACKGROUNDBestwick-Stevenson T, Toone R, Neupert E, Edwards K, Kluzek S. Assessment of Fatigue and Recovery in Sport: Narrative Review. Int J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;43(14):1151-1162. doi: 10.1055/a-1834-7177. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
PMID: 35468639BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jose Luis Felipe, PhD
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- We selected "None (Open Label)" for masking in this study for several reasons: Practicality and Feasibility: The interventions (cold and hot water immersions) are easily distinguishable by participants due to their distinct physical sensations, making blinding impractical. Transparency and Compliance: An open-label design allows full transparency with participants, enhancing compliance and cooperation as they understand the procedures and potential benefits. Ethical Considerations: Providing complete information respects participants' autonomy and their right to make informed decisions about their participation, especially for physical interventions affecting their health. Data Collection and Monitoring: The open-label design facilitates easier monitoring and data collection, improving accuracy and reliability without the need for complex blinding procedures. Focus on Objective Measures: The study relies on objective measures (thermography, biomarker analysis, performance tests)
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2025
First Posted
April 10, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We have decided not to share Individual Participant Data (IPD) with other researchers for several reasons: Participant Privacy and Confidentiality: Protecting participant privacy is paramount. Sharing IPD, even de-identified, risks re-identification and breaches confidentiality. Ethical Considerations: Our study involves sensitive health and performance data. Limiting access ensures responsible and ethical use, preventing misuse or misinterpretation. Data Security: Sharing IPD requires robust security measures to prevent unauthorized access and breaches, which are complex and resource-intensive to maintain. Informed Consent: Our consent process did not include provisions for sharing IPD with external researchers. Sharing data without explicit consent would violate ethical approval and participant trust. Resource Constraints: Managing data sharing requests and providing necessary support to external researchers require significant resources, which we currently lack.