Post-extubation Nasal Humidified High-flow Oxygen Versus Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
Post-extubation Support Using Nasal Humidified High-flow Oxygen Versus Non-invasive Positive Pressure Mechanical Ventilation in Preventing Reintubation Among Patients With Type II Respiratory Failure
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF), which is commonly defined as arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) ≥ 45 mmHg and frequently accompanied by reduced levels of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), can occur in a variety of etiologies, mainly in chronic respiratory diseases, such as exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, thoracic deformities, as well as other conditions, such as neuromuscular disease The purpose of this research is to To compare efficacy of administration of high flow nasal canula versus non-invasive mechanical ventilation on preventing reintubation during 72 hours postextubation of patients with type 2 respiratory failure with difficult weaning.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2025
CompletedApril 9, 2025
April 1, 2025
7 months
March 15, 2025
April 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcomes of this study will be the rate of re- intubation
frequency of re-intubation
72 hours and 7 days after extubation.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
ventilator-free days
28 days post-randomization
duration of respiratory support after extubation.
72 hours after extubation
treatment failure and reintubation rate
during 48 hours after extubation.
respiratory support related adverse events
72 hours post extubation
Delirium
72 hours postextubation
Study Arms (2)
High flow nasal canula (HFNC) group.
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-invasive positive pressure mechanical ventilation (NIPPV) group.
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
All patients assigned to the HFNC group will receive HFNC immediately after extubation. Researchers will need to choose the suitable size nasal catheter. The initial airflow will be set to 50 L/min and adjusted according to patient tolerance with an absolute humidity setting to 44 mgH2O/L and the temperature setting to 37 °C.The patient's respiratory rate will be maintained below 30 beats/min or the baseline level before extubation with a SpO2 at 88-92%. HFNC failure is defined as escalation to NIV or invasive mechanical ventilation due to respiratory failure.
All patients assigned to the control group will receive NIV immediately after extubation. Researchers will use a standard oronasal mask to connect the patient to the ventilator. The patients will be on Spontaneous/Timed (S/T) mode, with the initial end-expiratory pressure setting to 4 cmH2O. The pressure level will gradually increase to ensure that the patients can trigger the ventilator with each inhalation. The initial inspiratory pressure will be set at 8 cmH2O and adjusted according to the tidal volume with 6-8 ml/kg and tolerance of patients. The pres- sure level and the fraction of inspiration oxygen will be adjusted in order to maintain the respiratory rate ≤ 30/ min or the baseline level before extubation, a partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) at 45-60 mmHg or the last PaCO2 level recorded before extubation, and a pulse oxygen saturation at 88-92%. NIV treatment failure is defined as a return to invasive mechanical ventilation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The study will be recruited on type II respiratory failure patients with difficult weaning from invasive mechanical. Patients who will fulfil the eligibility criteria will be randomly divided into HFNC or NIV groups to receive sequential treatment after extubation.
- Hypercapnic respiratory failure is defined as an elevation in PaCO2 greater than 45 mmHg and a pH lower than 7.35 resulting from respiratory pump failure and/or production.
- Type 2 respiratory failure common causes :
- Neuromuscular Disorders such as: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Myasthenia gravis, Muscular dystrophy.
- Spinal cord injuries or damage to the spinal cord that can impair respiratory function.
- Pulmonary Disorders Like Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) ,Cystic fibrosis, Pneumonia Severe infection can cause respiratory failure , Pulmonary embolism.
- Obesity and Sleep-Related Disorders like Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), obstructive sleep apnea(OSA).
- Chest Wall and Pleural Disorders as Kyphoscoliosis, Pleural effusion, Pneumothorax.
- Other Causes: Sedative overdose, Neurological disorders, high altitude
You may not qualify if:
- \. Lack of informed consent. 2. A contraindication to NIV (oral and facial trauma, excessive phlegm with poor expectoration ability, hemodynamic instability, recent esophageal surgery).
- \. Patients with poor short-term prognosis (very high risk of death within seven days or receiving palliative care).
- \. Other organs' failure e.g severe heart, brain, liver, or kidney failure. 5. Tracheostomised patients. 6. Loss of follow up and uncertain 28 day survival.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Benha Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Banha Faculity of Medicine
Banhā, Elqalyoubea, 13511, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Thille AW, Harrois A, Schortgen F, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L. Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2612-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182282a5a.
PMID: 21765357BACKGROUNDComellini V, Pacilli AMG, Nava S. Benefits of non-invasive ventilation in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Respirology. 2019 Apr;24(4):308-317. doi: 10.1111/resp.13469. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
PMID: 30636373BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ahmed Mostafa Abdelhamid, Professor of Anesthesia
faculty of medicine, Benha university
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fatma Ahmed Abdelfattah, MD Anesthesia and intensive ca
faculty of medicine, Benha university
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohamed Shaker Sadek, MD chest diseases
faculty of medicine, Benha university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2025
First Posted
April 9, 2025
Study Start
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion
October 30, 2025
Last Updated
April 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04