NCT06912464

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to assess how safe it is for critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to undergo a PET scan. A PET scan is a type of medical imaging used to help determine why a patient is sick. It is similar to a CT scan but involves a small amount of radioactivity to highlight areas of concern in the body. For a PET scan, patients need to be transported from the ICU to the scanning room, which can be risky because ICU patients are often very fragile. After a patient gets the PET scan injection, their body gives off a small amount of radiation for a short time. Because of this, doctors and nurses have to keep some distance to protect themselves. This means they keep an eye out for the patient from a bit further away than normal. This makes the procedure slightly riskier, especially for very sick patients. This study aims to answer the question: Is getting a PET scan riskier for ICU patients than a regular CT scan? All patients in this study will continue to receive their usual critical care. Researchers will closely monitor the scanning process to evaluate its safety. PET scans are already widely used to detect cancer, but new advancements may allow us to use them more often to diagnose infections. Before this can become routine practice, we need to ensure that PET scanning is just as safe as other commonly used imaging techniques. This study will assess all ICU patients undergoing a PET scan-regardless of the reason for the scan-to determine how safe the procedure is in critically ill individuals.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
208

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
11mo left

Started Apr 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress55%
Apr 2025Apr 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2025

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 4, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 31, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Intrahospital transport (IHT)Intensive Care MedicineICUPETPET/CTSafetyCT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Adverse Events

    All adverse events associated with imaging procedures (PET and CT) This will encompass (amongst others) oxygen desaturation, bronchospasm, accidental extubation, hypo-/hypertension, cardiac arrest, malfunctioning medical devices, lack of necessary medication etc.) Timeframe: Start transport to PET/CT scanner and 4 hours hands-off time. We will score the noted adverse events in a grading scale adapted from the Clavien-Dindo classification that surgeons use to grade the severity of post-operative complications.

    Measured during the transport phase and 4 hours after return to the Intensive Care Unit.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Employee dosimetry

    Transport and the hands-off time after scan (i.e. 4h in case of [18]FDG PET scanning)

  • Dietary Adjustment

    24-48 hours before scan procedure and until 24 hours after cessation of the diet.

  • Kidney failure (KDIGO)

    Day of the scan and up to 3 days after the scan to evaluate the effect on kidney function (i.e. creatinine and urine creatinine will be measured 4 times and evaluated for significant alterations after the application of iodine contrast (if given))

Study Arms (2)

PET/CT

Patients undergoing a PET/CT for any reason will be evaluated for safety.

CT

All patients undergoing a (planned) CT-Thorax/Abdomen will be included in the analysis.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Only patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) will be studied.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients receiving PET/CT during ICU admission (any indication)
  • Patients undergoing CT Thorax/Abdomen (matched cohort)

You may not qualify if:

  • CT-scan for any acute indication (acute danger to vital parameters).
  • CT-Cerebrum
  • Registrion in the dutch Objection to medical research registry.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9713GZ, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Baldetti L, Busnardo E, Pazzanese V, Ricchetti G, Barone G, Sacchi S, Calvo F, Gramegna M, Pieri M, Ingallina G, Camici PG, Ajello S, Scandroglio AM. Myocardial viability assessment during Impella support with 18-fluorodesoxyglucose PET imaging. ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;12(1):683-687. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15053. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

    PMID: 39239887BACKGROUND
  • Slart RHJA, Tsoumpas C, Glaudemans AWJM, Noordzij W, Willemsen ATM, Borra RJH, Dierckx RAJO, Lammertsma AA. Long axial field of view PET scanners: a road map to implementation and new possibilities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Dec;48(13):4236-4245. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05461-6. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

    PMID: 34136956BACKGROUND
  • Schwebel C, Clec'h C, Magne S, Minet C, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Bonadona A, Dumenil AS, Jamali S, Kallel H, Goldgran-Toledano D, Marcotte G, Azoulay E, Darmon M, Ruckly S, Souweine B, Timsit JF; OUTCOMEREA Study Group. Safety of intrahospital transport in ventilated critically ill patients: a multicenter cohort study*. Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1919-28. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a3bbd.

    PMID: 23863225BACKGROUND
  • Bercault N, Wolf M, Runge I, Fleury JC, Boulain T. Intrahospital transport of critically ill ventilated patients: a risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia--a matched cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2471-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000185644.54646.65.

    PMID: 16276168BACKGROUND
  • Parmentier-Decrucq E, Poissy J, Favory R, Nseir S, Onimus T, Guerry MJ, Durocher A, Mathieu D. Adverse events during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: incidence and risk factors. Ann Intensive Care. 2013 Apr 12;3(1):10. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-10.

    PMID: 23587445BACKGROUND
  • Waydhas C. Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 1999;3(5):R83-9. doi: 10.1186/cc362. Epub 1999 Sep 24.

    PMID: 11094486BACKGROUND
  • Murata M, Nakagawa N, Kawasaki T, Yasuo S, Yoshida T, Ando K, Okamori S, Okada Y. Adverse events during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;52:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.021. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

    PMID: 34861515BACKGROUND
  • Venkategowda PM, Rao SM, Mutkule DP, Taggu AN. Unexpected events occurring during the intra-hospital transport of critically ill ICU patients. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;18(6):354-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.133880.

    PMID: 24987233BACKGROUND
  • Brunsveld-Reinders AH, Arbous MS, Kuiper SG, de Jonge E. A comprehensive method to develop a checklist to increase safety of intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2015 May 7;19(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0938-1.

    PMID: 25947327BACKGROUND
  • van Leer B, van Rijsewijk ND, Nijsten MWN, Slart RHJA, Pillay J, Glaudemans AWJM. Practice of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in ICU Patients: A Systematic Review. Semin Nucl Med. 2023 Nov;53(6):809-819. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 May 29.

    PMID: 37258380BACKGROUND
  • van Snick JH, van Leer B, Nijsten MWN, Pillay J, Slart RHJA, Glaudemans AWJM, van Rijsewijk ND. Long axial field of view PET/CT in critically ill patients: lessons from a case report. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 4;10:1347791. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1347791. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 38239612BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Cornelis Paul Van Stee, MD

CONTACT

Janesh Pillay, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
2 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2025

First Posted

April 4, 2025

Study Start

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All IPD that underlie the results in the publication will be made available upon request by other researchers.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Once data collection has been completed, data will be made available on request. Ergo circa April 2027.
Access Criteria
Only data gathered to answer the primary research question posed in this study will be made available and only upon request via the primary researcher.

Locations