Silicone vs Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids
A Observer Blind Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial to Determine the Equivalence of a Silicone Gel With Superoxidized Water vs. a Pirfenidone Gel for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Justification: Keloid scars are a major medical and cosmetic problem, especially in darker skin types that predominate in Mexico. It is estimated that hypertrophic scars affecting from 1.5 to 4.5% of the general population. However, the exact prevalence is unknown but studies show that going from 32 to 67%. And there are studies documenting that this prevalence is higher in Hispanic and black individuals and in the pediatric population. Keloid scars can become highly symptomatic disfiguring and which affects the quality of life of patients and their self-esteem.Problem Statement: Is silicone gel solutions superoxidation with equal or better than the gel 8% pirfenidone to treat keloids and hypertrophic scars? Goal: To evaluate the efficacy of a silicone gel-oxidation with solutions compared to a gel containing 8% pirfenidone. Hypothesis: If the silicone gel solutions superoxidation is equal or better than gel 8% pirfenidone to treat keloids and hypertrophic scars, then the reduction in the ECV and the EVA will be similar in the first group than the second. Design: Comparative, observer blind, experimental and prospective study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jul 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 14, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2025
CompletedApril 4, 2025
March 1, 2025
6 months
July 30, 2015
March 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Dermatology Life Quality Index Score
A life quality index for dermatological conditions
3 months
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Score
A validated scale (POSAS and OSAS) to assess relevant clinical characteristics of scars.
3 months
Vancouver Scar Scale
A validated scar scale
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Topical Silicone Gel
ACTIVE COMPARATORA gel containing silicone
Topical Pirfenidone Gel
ACTIVE COMPARATORA gel containing pirfenidone
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- keloid or hypetrophic scar
You may not qualify if:
- collagen diseases pregnancy previous treatment for 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital General Manuel Gea González
Mexico City, Mexico City, 01710, Mexico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jose Contreras-Ruiz
Hospital General Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Tubes containg both active treatments were identical. Outcomes assessor was blinded to treatment arm.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2015
First Posted
April 4, 2025
Study Start
July 14, 2015
Primary Completion
January 20, 2016
Study Completion
January 20, 2016
Last Updated
April 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03