Use of an Educational Video to Improve Adherence to Treatment in Voiding Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to see whether an educational video on a common urinary dysfunction leads to improved parent and child perceived adherence to treatments recommendations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2027
July 25, 2025
July 1, 2025
2 years
March 27, 2025
July 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perceived Adherence
Participants will take the TAPQ perceived adherence assessment at time points 4 weeks and 8 weeks.
4 weeks, 8 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Video Acceptability
0 weeks.
Dysfunctional Voiding Scoring System
0 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Educational Video
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be exposed to a short 3-minute educational video following a visit with their urology provider.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will not be exposed to an educational video; rather, they will receive standard of care education in clinic regarding behavioral treatment modalities at home.
Interventions
The educational video is a short 3-minute video which describes the condition in detail, at the level that a parent or child could understand without a medical background.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents and Caregivers of pediatric urology patients with a diagnosis of Dysfunctional voiding (minimum 100 participants)
- years old, no younger than 5 and no older than 18 years old
- Potty-trained - fully independent with toileting, can complete every step of the process and can do so satisfactorily by themselves.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with Voiding dysfunctionDysfunctional voiders with medically complex conditions (neurogenic bladder, POTS, EDS, etc.)
- Parent's child is notNot a first-time patient (i.e. has been seen in the past for dysfunctional voiding)
- Child has severeSevere intellectual disability, developmental delay, or cognitive impairment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado Anschutz
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Related Publications (2)
Feldman AS, Bauer SB. Diagnosis and management of dysfunctional voiding. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006 Apr;18(2):139-47. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000193289.64151.49.
PMID: 16601493BACKGROUNDDyson PA, Beatty S, Matthews DR. An assessment of lifestyle video education for people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Aug;23(4):353-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01077.x. Epub 2010 May 20.
PMID: 20497292BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- masking is not feasible as the use of a video will be known to both researcher and patient
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2025
First Posted
April 3, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2027
Last Updated
July 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
resource limitations