NCT06903429

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of LuminoMarkTM as a method of targeting axillary lymph nodes with other existing methods used in each institution, such as charcoal staining, needle targeting, and ultrasound-guided skin marking, in patients with breast cancer clinically suspected of metastasis, with or without clipping at the time of diagnosis, regardless of the presence or absence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. By doing so, the investigators aimed to confirm the safety and usefulness of LuminoMarkTM as a targeting method.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
330

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
20mo left

Started May 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress38%
May 2025Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 11, 2025

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 30, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2025

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

March 30, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

March 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

TargetingAxillary lymph nodebreast cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy of the axillary lymph node targeting method

    The outcome will be assessed by determining whether the preoperatively marked (targeted) lymph node is successfully identified and retrieved during surgery, and confirmed by postoperative pathological examination. Success (match): The retrieved lymph node is matched with targeted lymph node. Failure (not match): The retrieved lymph node is not matched with targeted lymph node.

    From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks

  • Comparison the accuracy rate between LuminoMark group and conventional group

    Compare the rate at which the lymph nodes are accurately detected using charcoal staining, needle targeting, ultrasound-guided marking, etc., with the rate at which they are detected using LuminoMark.

    At the end of the trial (up to 1 year)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Comparion of surgical time between two group

    During surgery

  • Comparison of complications between two groups

    From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks

  • Adverse drug reactions

    From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks

  • Concordance rate between sentinel lymph node and targeted lymph node in both group

    From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks

Study Arms (2)

LuminoMarkTM group

EXPERIMENTAL

LuminoMarkTM using group for targeting of axillary lymph node

Procedure: Targeting of axillary lymph nodes using LuminoMark

Conventional group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional method using group for targeting of axillary lymph node

Procedure: Targeting of axillary lymph nodes using conventional method

Interventions

This group used LuminoMark as a targeting method for axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with suspected metastasis, comparing it to existing methods (charcoal staining, needle targeting, ultrasound-guided skin marking) to assess its safety and effectiveness, with procedural differences based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy status.

LuminoMarkTM group

This group used conventional method (charcoal staining, needle targeting, ultrasound-guided skin marking) as a targeting method for axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with suspected metastasis, with procedural differences based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy status.

Conventional group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 20 to 70 years
  • Women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer through biopsy
  • Patients with clinically and imaging-suspected axillary lymph node metastasis, confirmed pathologically (aspiration cytology or needle biopsy)
  • Clinically staged T1-T4, N1-3
  • Patients who have fully understood the clinical trial content (if possible) and signed the informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with inadequate radiological evaluation of the axilla before surgery
  • Recurrent breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer
  • Breast cancer with distant metastasis (Stage 4)
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the components of the investigational drug
  • Patients scheduled for axillary dissection that does not require targeting of the target lesion
  • Patients with active connective tissue disease (e.g., scleroderma, lupus) that has invaded the skin
  • Patients with locally advanced breast cancer or inflammatory locally advanced breast cancer that is not amenable to surgery
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the main component or excipients of the investigational drug
  • Female subjects who may become pregnant during the clinical trial period and do not agree to use a highly effective non-hormonal contraception method (e.g., sterilization, intrauterine device, complete abstinence, vasectomy partner) from the time of investigational drug injection until the follow-up visit
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Patients who have participated in another clinical trial within 12 weeks before enrollment in this clinical trial
  • Patients deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigator for any other reason

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (10)

  • Takemoto N, Koyanagi A, Yasuda M, Yamamoto H. Comparison of the indocyanine green dye method versus the combined method of indigo carmine blue dye with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast conservative therapy for stage </=IIA breast cancer. BMC Womens Health. 2018 Sep 18;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0646-5.

    PMID: 30227837BACKGROUND
  • Lee J, Kang B, Jung JH, Kim HJ, Kim WH, Yang JD, Lee JS, Chae YS, Lee SJ, Lee IH, Park JY, Park NJ, Park HY. Feasibility of an indocyanine green-hyaluronic acid mixture (LuminoMark) for targeting suspicious axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1588. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13175-9.

    PMID: 39736609BACKGROUND
  • Bang YJ, Choi HJ, Kim I, Lee MH, Lee S, Shin HJ, Nam SJ, Lee JE, Chae BJ, Lee SK, Ryu JM, Kim SW. The efficacy and safety of an indocyanine green-hyaluronic acid mixture (LuminoMark) for localization in patients with non-palpable breast lesions: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel phase 3 clinical trial. Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 24;13:1039670. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1039670. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 37035212BACKGROUND
  • Kitzman JV, Martin JF, Holley JH, Huber WG. Determination of antipyrine in catfish plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1988 Mar 11;437(1):306-10. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)90399-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3372671BACKGROUND
  • Lin J, Lin LS, Chen DR, Lin KJ, Wang YF, Chang YJ. Indocyanine green fluorescence method for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Asian J Surg. 2020 Dec;43(12):1149-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

    PMID: 32143963BACKGROUND
  • White KP, Sinagra D, Dip F, Rosenthal RJ, Mueller EA, Lo Menzo E, Rancati A. Indocyanine green fluorescence versus blue dye, technetium-99M, and the dual-marker combination of technetium-99M + blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early breast cancer-meta-analysis including consistency analysis. Surgery. 2024 Apr;175(4):963-973. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

    PMID: 38097484BACKGROUND
  • Bargon CA, Huibers A, Young-Afat DA, Jansen BAM, Borel-Rinkes IHM, Lavalaye J, van Slooten HJ, Verkooijen HM, van Swol CFP, Doeksen A. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients Through Fluorescent Imaging Using Indocyanine Green: The INFLUENCE Trial. Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):913-920. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005633. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

    PMID: 35894448BACKGROUND
  • Kim WH, Kim HJ, Jung JH, Park HY, Lee J, Kim WW, Park JY, Chae YS, Lee SJ. Ultrasound-Guided Restaging and Localization of Axillary Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Guidance of Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: Experience with Activated Charcoal. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Feb;25(2):494-500. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6250-3. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

    PMID: 29134374BACKGROUND
  • Kim WH, Kim HJ, Jung JH, Park HY, Lee J, Kim WW, Park JY, Cheon H, Lee SM, Cho SH, Shin KM, Kim GC. Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Non-palpable and Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes with Subsequent Removal after Tattooing: False-Negative Results and Concordance with Sentinel Lymph Nodes. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Nov;43(11):2576-2581. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Aug 19.

    PMID: 28830644BACKGROUND
  • Lee J, Jung JH, Kim WW, Lee RK, Kim HJ, Kim WH, Park JY, Jeong JY, Chae YS, Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim MY, Yang JD, Lee JW, Lee JS, Park HY. 5-year oncological outcomes of targeted axillary sampling in pT1-2N1 breast cancer. Asian J Surg. 2019 Jun;42(6):681-687. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

    PMID: 30470459BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsErythema Multiforme

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesErythemaSkin Diseases, Vesiculobullous

Study Officials

  • Korean Breast Cancer Society Study Group

    Korean Breast Cancer Society Study Group

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Jeeyeon Lee, Associate professor in Kyungpook National University, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Joon Suk Moon, Clinical assistant professor, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2025

First Posted

March 30, 2025

Study Start

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

March 30, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share