Effectiveness of a Standardized Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation Program with Shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment Stratification
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of a standardized stroke upper limb rehabilitation program with stratification using Shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment (S-FM). The standardized program was compared with conventional training based on the hospital protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 11, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 26, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2025
CompletedMarch 30, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.8 years
March 16, 2025
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment (S-FM)
S-FM consisted of six items examining upper extremity movements (shoulder elevation, shoulder flexion 90° to 180°, elbow extension, elbow 90° pronation/supination, elbow 90° wrist flexion/extension and grasp, adduct thumb). Each item was scored with an ordinal scale of 0 (unable to perform), 1 (partially performed) and 2 (fully performed). The total score was 12.
From enrollment to the end of treatment up to 6 weeks
Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE)
FTHUE consisted of 18 activities examining upper extremity function. Seven levels with 1-3 activities in each level in a hierarchy sequence of difficulty were adopted.
From enrollment to the end of treatment up to 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Modified Barthel Index (MBI)
From enrollment to the end of treatment up to 6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Standardized upper limb rehabilitation program
EXPERIMENTALA new stroke upper limb rehabilitation program was designed. Participants were classified into 3 categories based on their level of upper limb impairment reflected by the baseline S-FM score (severe 0-4, moderate 5-8, mild 9-12). Upper limb training was provided according to the standardized treatment choices preset with expert opinions
Conventional upper limb training
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatments were prescribed based on the corporate stroke rehabilitation protocol of Hong Kong Hospital Authority. The protocol allowed variations in clinical practice and ultimate decision about a particular clinical treatment depended on each individual patient's condition and clinical judgment of individual therapists.
Interventions
Intervention selection included stretching and mobilization exercise, strengthening exercise, electrical stimulation, acupuncture, functional or task specific training and mirror therapy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- first stroke, able to attend gym training and give written consent
You may not qualify if:
- unstable medical condition, any musculoskeletal conditions or other diseases restricted upper limb training, unfit mental state and unable to follow command
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tai Po Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (5)
McDonnell MN, Hillier SL, Esterman AJ. Standardizing the approach to evidence-based upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):432-40. doi: 10.1310/tsr2005-432.
PMID: 24091285BACKGROUNDGarcia-Vega J, Gregory G, Lind CRP, Singer BJ. Development of a consensus approach to upper limb rehabilitation early post stroke amongst a cohort of Western Australian therapists. N Z J Physiother 2016;44(3):133-147
BACKGROUNDHirayama K, Takebayashi T, Takahashi K. Factors Influencing Decision-Making for Poststroke Paretic Upper Limb Treatment: A Survey of Japanese Physical and Occupational Therapists. Occup Ther Int. 2024 Oct 7;2024:1854449. doi: 10.1155/2024/1854449. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39403110BACKGROUNDHsieh YW, Hsueh IP, Chou YT, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL, Kwakkel G. Development and validation of a short form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2007 Nov;38(11):3052-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490730. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
PMID: 17916763BACKGROUNDLam Wong SH, Tung Chim TH, Ho Chung BP, On Lau TF. Effectiveness of a standardised stroke upper extremity rehabilitation program with shortened Fugl-Meyer assessment stratification: A randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2025 Dec;45(2):157-167. doi: 10.1142/S1013702525500131. Epub 2025 Nov 25.
PMID: 41477567DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Advanced Practice Physiotherapist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2025
First Posted
March 30, 2025
Study Start
October 11, 2022
Primary Completion
July 26, 2024
Study Completion
July 26, 2024
Last Updated
March 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who are working on similar study topic with approved independent review can contact for IPD and supporting information sharing. A proposal that describes planned analyses and signed data sharing agreement have to be submitted to the corresponding author for review.
all IPD that underlie results in a publication