Comparison of the Effects of Protocols Applied After Surgical Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
Comparison of the Effects of Ozone Therapy, Hyaluronic Acid, Methylprednisolone, and Low-Level Laser Therapy on Pain, Edema, and Trismus Following Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molars
2 other identifiers
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Following the surgical extraction of the most commonly impacted mandibular third molars, the first group was planned to receive methylprednisolone, the second group hyaluronic acid, the third group ozone therapy, the fourth group laser application, and the fifth group only the routine treatment protocol. The study comparatively evaluated the effectiveness of these five groups in preventing complications such as pain, edema, and trismus that may develop after impacted third molar surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2025
CompletedMarch 28, 2025
March 1, 2025
6 months
March 22, 2025
March 22, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Trismus
Preoperative maximum mouth opening for trismus (measured as the distance between the upper right and lower right central incisors) was recorded using a Vernier caliper (Mayerbach M003, Germany)
All patient data were collected on the 3rd and 7th postoperative days by a researcher blinded to the study groups.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Edema
All patient data were collected on the 3rd and 7th postoperative days by a researcher blinded to the study groups.
Other Outcomes (1)
Pain Level
All patient data were collected on the 3rd and 7th postoperative days by a researcher blinded to the study groups.
Study Arms (5)
Group 1 Laser
EXPERIMENTALIn Group 1, after the extraction of the impacted third molar, a diode laser (Epic X, Biolase, USA) with a wavelength of 940 nm and power of 0.2 W was applied in non-contact mode for 25 seconds at an energy density of 10 J/cm² to the occlusal, buccal, and lingual surfaces of the extraction site.
Group 2 Hyaluronic acid
EXPERIMENTALIn Group 2, after the extraction of the impacted third molar, 1 cc of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid gel (240 mg/100 g) (Bioplax, London, UK) was placed into the extraction socket.
Group 3 Ozone
EXPERIMENTALIn Group 3, after the extraction of the impacted third molar, topical ozone therapy (W\&H Prozone Ozone Generator) was applied to the extraction socket for 15 seconds.
Group 4 Methylprednisolone
EXPERIMENTALIn Group 4, in addition to the standard prescribed medication, patients received 4 mg oral methylprednisolone (Koçak Farma İlaç ve Kimya Sanayi A.Ş., Istanbul) starting immediately after surgery. It was administered three times on the first day, twice on the second day, and once on the third day.
Group 5 Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Group 5 (control group), only the standard prescribed medication was provided.
Interventions
A single session was applied to three points of the tooth extraction site.
1 cc of hyaluronic acid gel was placed into the extraction socket, followed by suturing.
Topical ozone was applied to the extraction socket, followed by suturing.
In addition to the standard prescribed medication, 4 mg of oral methylprednisolone was prescribed postoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I or II
- Age range of 18-35 years
- Individuals of both genders
- Horizontally impacted teeth with the same angulation according to Winter's classification
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any pathological condition around the impacted tooth
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Smokers
- Individuals with allergic reactions to the adjuvants or prescribed medications used in the study
- Surgical extraction procedures exceeding 30 minutes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dicle University
Diyarbakır, Sur, 21280, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nedim GÜNEŞ, Ass.Prof.
Dicle University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2025
First Posted
March 28, 2025
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
August 30, 2017
Study Completion
September 22, 2017
Last Updated
March 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share