Role of Kefir Mouth Wash in Oral Health Status Amelioration
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present research aims to evaluate the efficiency of kefir mouthwash in enhancing oral health status by employing an in vivo experimental approach. Specifically, the study will assess how kefir mouthwash influences key oral health indicators, including gingival inflammation, plaque development, oral hygiene status, and halitosis. The study will be conducted over a 28-day period, with follow-up assessments every 14 days. The study will include systemically healthy adults with moderate gingivitis. Clinical parameters such as the Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), and Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) will be measured, along with inflammatory biomarkers, including Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and Interleukin-10 (IL-10). Halitosis will be evaluated using a Hali meter device. All of these will be measured at base line and day 14 and day 28 end of the study. Chlorhexidine 0.12% will be used as a comparative control to evaluate the efficacy of kefir mouthwash in improving oral health. This research intends to provide scientific evidence supporting the use of kefir as a probiotic-based mouthwash, offering a natural alternative to chemical mouthwashes and potentially reducing the negative consequences commonly associated with their use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 6, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2025
CompletedApril 24, 2025
March 1, 2025
5 months
March 9, 2025
April 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Changes in the clinical periodontal parameters of Gingival index
Gingival Index (GI): Subjects will undergo the measurement of the Gingival Index (GI), designed to assess the severity and quality of gingival inflammation in an individual or population. The gingival inflammation is assessed based on color, consistency, and bleeding on probing. The unit of measurement for the Gingival Index (GI) is a numerical scale from 0 to 3, where each number represents the severity of gingival inflammation. Data will be collected based on the following four possible clinical conditions: Score 0 : Normal gingiva -no inflammation, healthy gums. Score1 : Mild Inflammation -slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing. Score 2 : Moderate Inflammation- redness, edema, and glazing; bleeding on probing. Score 3 : Severe Inflammation -marked redness and edema, ulceration, with a tendency for spontaneous bleeding.
0,14 ,28 days
Changes in clinical periodontal parameters of Plaque index
Plaque Index (PI): To determine the Plaque Index (PI) for participant, their dental plaque thickness is evaluated by probing the mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal surfaces of the teeth. During this evaluation, the probe is used to examine the presence of plaque. The individual plaque index will be determined by summing the values obtained for each tooth and calculating the average. scale as unit of measurement. The scoring system for the Plaque Index (PI) is as follows: Score 0 : No plaque-no plaque is present on any of the surfaces being probed. Score1 : Slight plaque- a small amount of plaque is visible at the gingival margin (border of the gum), but it is not abundant. Score2 : Moderate plaque- plaque is visible in moderate amounts, covering a larger portion of the tooth surface. Score 3 : Abundant plaque- a significant amount of plaque is present, covering most or all of the tooth surface.
0,14 ,28 days
Assessment of Oral Hygiene Status Using the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index
The Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (SOHI) is used to assess the oral hygiene status of participants by evaluating the amount of plaque and calculus present on their teeth. Using scale 0-3 as unit of measurement. The scoring system is as follows: Score 0 : Excellent Oral Hygiene- no plaque or calculus is present on the teeth. Score 1 : Good Oral Hygiene-small amounts of plaque or calculus are present, but they do not significantly affect oral health. Score 2 :Fair Oral Hygiene- moderate plaque or calculus accumulation is observed, indicating a need for improvement in oral hygiene practices. Score 3 : Poor Oral Hygiene-heavy plaque and/or calculus buildup is present, indicating poor oral hygiene practices and a need for immediate intervention. In this assessment, participants are evaluated based on these categories, with lower scores representing better oral hygiene and higher scores indicating a worse hygienic state.
0,14 ,28 days
Changes in the level of Halitosis
The Hali Meter Device (YRY Smart Breath Odor Detector) will be used to measure oral malodor (halitosis) by identifying volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) . The severity of halitosis will be categorized into four levels based on the social distance cm at which the odor is detectable: Level 1 (Green light): Slight odor (20-65 cm) Level 2 (Yellow light): Moderate odor (65-90 cm) Level 3 (Pink light): Strong odor (90-120 cm) Level 4 (Red light): Intense odor (\>120 cm) Measurement Method: Preparation: Subjects would refrain from eating, drinking, or performing oral hygiene for at least 1 hour before measurement . Test Initiation: The test would begin when the device vibrates and a blue light flashes. Measurement: The subject would blow into the device for 5 seconds, 1 cm away, and the corresponding light color would indicate the severity of halitosis. The results would be saved after pressing the top of the device.
0,14 ,28 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Changes in the level of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β by unstimulated saliva collection
0,14 ,28 days
Changes in the level of inflammatory cytokines IL10 by unstimulated saliva collection
0,14 ,28 days
Study Arms (2)
Kefir Mouth Wash
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe experimental group will take 60 mL of kefir mouthwash (Yogourmet, France) which contains live probiotic strains and active bacterial and yeast cultures, including (Lactococcus lactis, Lactococcus cremoris, Lactococcus diacetylactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Kluyveromyces lactis, and maltodextrin)mixed with milk with 3 percent fat (Pegah, Iran) .The milk will be heated to boiling point and then allow to cool to room temperature (25°C). After cooling, the kefir powder will be dissolved and culture for 24 hours, use 60 ml daily, split into 30 mL in the morning and 30 mL in the evening. To guarantee uniformity in the intervention, participants follow a set rinse technique. Participants will be instructed to use the respective mouthwash (Kefir mouth wash) twice daily for 1 minute, 30 minutes after brushing their teeth, after the mouthwash application, participants will be advised not to eat or drink anything for one hour to ensure accurate results.
Chlorhexidine 0,12% Bio fresh Mouth Wash
OTHERThe control group will take 30 mL of 0.12% chlorhexidine Bio fresh mouthwash (Scirto Co for Bio fresh LIC)daily, split into 15 mL in the morning and 15 mL in the evening. To guarantee uniformity in the intervention, participants follow a set rinse technique. Participants will be instructed to use the respective mouthwash (chlorhexidine) for 28 days twice daily for 1 minute, 30 minutes after brushing their teeth, after the mouthwash application, participants will be advised not to eat or drink anything for one hour to ensure accurate results.
Interventions
A kefir-based mouthwash was developed with active bacterial and yeast cultures, including Lactococcus lactis, Lactococcus cremoris, Lactococcus diacetylactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Kluyveromyces lactis, along with maltodextrin and 3% fat milk. The recipe also calls for milk from Pegah, Iran. The milk is initially heated to boiling point and then allowed to cool to room temperature (25°C). After cooling, the kefir powder will be dissolved in the cooled milk and mixed well. For every 1 liter of milk, 3g of kefir starter yogurt (Yogourmet, France) will be added. The inoculated milk will then be transferred into a clean, airtight container, and the lid will be sealed. The container will be left at room temperature for approximately 24 hours until the kefir curd forms. After 24 hours, the kefir will be refrigerated for about 8 hours to halt the fermentation process.
Chlorhexidine mouthwash is used as a standard treatment (Scitra Co for Biofresh LIC, P.O. Box 87218, Dubai, U.A.E.). It contains 0.12% Chlorhexidine Digluconate, purified water, sodium saccharin, cremophor, flavor, and glycerin.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age range 18-28 years.
- Systemically healthy people without a history of chronic illness.
- Those suffering with moderate gingivitis.
- Not using any antibiotics over three months
You may not qualify if:
- History of systemic diseases.
- Pregnant, lactating females.
- History of antibiotic therapy in the past 3 months.
- History of oral prophylaxis within the last 6 months prior to the study as this can confound the results, making it difficult to determine the real effect of the mouthwash.
- Subjects with mouth breathing habits.
- Subjects with orthodontic and prosthodontic appliances.
- Subjects with deleterious habits such as smoking, because it may affect oral health status, causing periodontal disease, altered oral microbiota, and impaired healing. This can confound the study results, making it difficult to observe the mouthwash effect .
- Failure to follow the prescription regimen.
- Failure to follow the research protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al-Mustansiriyah University/College of Dentistry
Baghdad, Iraq
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zahra H Al-Tamimi, MS student
Department of prevention, College of dentistry , University of Mustansiriyah
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Upon verifying a diagnosis of moderate gingivitis, sixty individuals will be randomly allocated into two parallel groups using the Research Randomizer program (v. 2.0, https://www.randomizer.org),to mitigate bias. This procedure will be managed by a practiced dentist who is not participating in the trial and is securely maintain under his exclusive control. Both mouthwashes will be contained in bottles of similar color and form, labeled with codes (A, B) to ensure experimental blinding. This blinding technique guaranteed that neither the participants nor the examiner and no data analyses aware of the specific mouthwash included in each bottle.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Master's Student in Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2025
First Posted
March 28, 2025
Study Start
April 6, 2025
Primary Completion
September 10, 2025
Study Completion
October 10, 2025
Last Updated
April 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share