NCT06900842

Brief Summary

This study looks at two types of injections (called PECS and ESP blocks) to see which one works better for reducing pain after breast cancer surgery (mastectomy). The main question it asks is: Which block is better at reducing pain after surgery - PECS or ESP? Women who had this surgery and received one of the two blocks were followed for three months. We looked at how much pain they felt, how much pain medication they needed, and whether they still had pain months later. The results showed that both blocks helped with pain right after surgery. The ESP block lasted a little longer at first, but in general, both groups needed about the same amount of pain medicine. Three months later, about half of the patients still had some pain - especially those who had more extensive surgery or had nerve pain early on. There was no big difference between the two blocks when it came to long-term pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 22, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 20, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 20, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 28, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 28, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

breast cancerPostoperative PainChronic PainPECS I-II BlockErector Spinae Plane BlockESP BlockChronic Pain PreventionQuality of Life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of Chronic Postoperative Pain (NRS ≥1)

    The presence of chronic pain will be evaluated at 3 months postoperatively using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Patients reporting a score of ≥1 will be considered to have chronic postoperative pain. This measure aims to assess the long-term effectiveness of PECS I-II and ESP blocks in reducing chronic pain following mastectomy.

    3 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Postoperative Acute Pain Scores (NRS)

    At 20 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours after surgery

  • Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption (Morphine, mg)

    Within 24 hours after surgery

  • Time to First Analgesic Requirement

    Within 24 hours after surgery

  • Postoperative Quality of Life (SF-12 Score)

    3 months after surgery

  • Presence of Neuropathic Pain (DN4 Score > 4)

    At 20 minutes, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 3 months after surgery

Study Arms (2)

PECS I-II Block Group

This group includes patients who received an ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block (PECS I-II) before undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). PECS I involved the injection of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine between the pectoralis major and minor muscles. PECS II involved the injection of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles. The block was applied preoperatively at the discretion of the responsible anesthesiologist, independently from the study protocol. Postoperative pain scores, opioid requirements, and chronic pain development were evaluated.

ESP Block Group

This group includes patients who received an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block before undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The block was administered at the T4-T5 level, with 20-30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine injected between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. The procedure was performed in the lateral decubitus position and verified via hydrodissection. The decision to perform this block was made independently by the anesthesiologist. Pain scores and analgesic use were tracked to assess the block's effect on acute and chronic postoperative pain.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsThe study did not consider self-identified gender. Only individuals assigned female at birth were included.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Study participants will be selected from female patients aged 18 to 65 years who are scheduled to undergo elective modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer at Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Department of General Surgery. All participants must be classified as ASA physical status I or II and have received either a PECS I-II or ESP block as part of their routine pain management. Patients with significant comorbidities, pre-existing neurological deficits, or contraindications to regional anesthesia will be excluded.

You may qualify if:

  • Scheduled to undergo modified radical mastectomy due to breast cancer
  • Decision to perform PECS I-II or ESP block made independently from the study, as part of standard pain management
  • Aged between 18 and 65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I or II
  • Female

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to perform the block (e.g., coagulation disorder, allergy to local anesthetics, infection at the injection site)
  • Obesity (Body Mass Index \> 35 kg/m²)
  • Pre-existing neurological deficits
  • Younger than 18 or older than 65 years
  • ASA physical status classification III or IV
  • Refusal to give informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hacettepe University Hospital

Ankara, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Banerjee S, Goswami R. GST profile expression study in some selected plants: in silico approach. Mol Cell Biochem. 2010 Mar;336(1-2):109-26. doi: 10.1007/s11010-010-0384-y. Epub 2010 Feb 5.

    PMID: 20135200BACKGROUND
  • Carpenter JS, Andrykowski MA, Sloan P, Cunningham L, Cordova MJ, Studts JL, McGrath PC, Sloan D, Kenady DE. Postmastectomy/postlumpectomy pain in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;51(12):1285-92. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00121-8.

    PMID: 10086821BACKGROUND
  • Meijuan Y, Zhiyou P, Yuwen T, Ying F, Xinzhong C. A retrospective study of postmastectomy pain syndrome: incidence, characteristics, risk factors, and influence on quality of life. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Nov 27;2013:159732. doi: 10.1155/2013/159732. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 24379736BACKGROUND
  • Alves Nogueira Fabro E, Bergmann A, do Amaral E Silva B, Padula Ribeiro AC, de Souza Abrahao K, da Costa Leite Ferreira MG, de Almeida Dias R, Santos Thuler LC. Post-mastectomy pain syndrome: incidence and risks. Breast. 2012 Jun;21(3):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.01.019. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

    PMID: 22377590BACKGROUND
  • Jung BF, Ahrendt GM, Oaklander AL, Dworkin RH. Neuropathic pain following breast cancer surgery: proposed classification and research update. Pain. 2003 Jul;104(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00241-0. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12855309BACKGROUND
  • DeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):439-448. doi: 10.3322/caac.21412. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

    PMID: 28972651BACKGROUND
  • Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568.

    PMID: 19903919BACKGROUND
  • Macdonald L, Bruce J, Scott NW, Smith WC, Chambers WA. Long-term follow-up of breast cancer survivors with post-mastectomy pain syndrome. Br J Cancer. 2005 Jan 31;92(2):225-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602304.

    PMID: 15655557BACKGROUND
  • Hanley MA, Jensen MP, Smith DG, Ehde DM, Edwards WT, Robinson LR. Preamputation pain and acute pain predict chronic pain after lower extremity amputation. J Pain. 2007 Feb;8(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

    PMID: 16949876BACKGROUND
  • Tasmuth T, Kataja M, Blomqvist C, von Smitten K, Kalso E. Treatment-related factors predisposing to chronic pain in patients with breast cancer--a multivariate approach. Acta Oncol. 1997;36(6):625-30. doi: 10.3109/02841869709001326.

    PMID: 9408154BACKGROUND
  • Miguel R, Kuhn AM, Shons AR, Dyches P, Ebert MD, Peltz ES, Nguyen K, Cox CE. The effect of sentinel node selective axillary lymphadenectomy on the incidence of postmastectomy pain syndrome. Cancer Control. 2001 Sep-Oct;8(5):427-30. doi: 10.1177/107327480100800506.

    PMID: 11579339BACKGROUND
  • Steegers MA, Wolters B, Evers AW, Strobbe L, Wilder-Smith OH. Effect of axillary lymph node dissection on prevalence and intensity of chronic and phantom pain after breast cancer surgery. J Pain. 2008 Sep;9(9):813-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Jun 30.

    PMID: 18585963BACKGROUND
  • Kulhari S, Bharti N, Bala I, Arora S, Singh G. Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):382-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew223.

    PMID: 27543533BACKGROUND
  • Singh S, Chowdhary NK. Erector spinae plane block an effective block for post-operative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;62(2):148-150. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_726_17. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29491525BACKGROUND
  • Veiga M, Costa D, Brazao I. Erector spinae plane block for radical mastectomy: A new indication? Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;65(2):112-115. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Nov 2. English, Spanish.

    PMID: 29102405BACKGROUND
  • Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, Keefe FJ, Mogil JS, Ringkamp M, Sluka KA, Song XJ, Stevens B, Sullivan MD, Tutelman PR, Ushida T, Vader K. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020 Sep 1;161(9):1976-1982. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939.

    PMID: 32694387BACKGROUND
  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

    PMID: 30207593BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeBites and StingsNeuralgiaBreast NeoplasmsChronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPoisoningChemically-Induced DisordersWounds and InjuriesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
3 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Specialist in Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2025

First Posted

March 28, 2025

Study Start

May 22, 2024

Primary Completion

September 20, 2024

Study Completion

September 20, 2024

Last Updated

March 28, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations