Impacts of a Physical Therapy Protocol on Motor Function in Children With Congenital Zika Syndrome
Structured and Specialized Physical Therapy: Does it Make a Difference for Children With Congenital Zika Syndrome?
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to evaluate the effects of a specialized physiotherapy protocol aimed at the motor function of children with Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome. First, participants' anthropometric parameters (weight and length) and motor functions were assessed. After that participant were splited in two groups: Experimental group that uunderwent a one-hour daily protocol (5 times a week) of stimuli and handling based on the neuroevolutionary concept, and motor physical therapy with therapeutic garments (PediaSuit). On the other hand, the control group (CG) kept the therapeutic routine (conventional physical therapy).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2025
CompletedMarch 28, 2025
March 1, 2025
4 months
March 21, 2025
March 27, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88)
This scale is widely used in children with neurological impairments, comprising 88 tasks divided into five dimensions: A (lying and rolling); B (sitting); C (crawling and kneeling); D (standing); and E (walking, running, and jumping). Each task received a score ranging from 0 (inability to start the task) to 3 (completes the task). Thus, the total GMFM-88 score ranged from 0 to 264 points; higher scores indicated better motor function.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALControl group
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Participants underwent a one-hour daily protocol (5 times a week) of stimuli and handling based on the neuroevolutionary concept, and motor physical therapy with therapeutic garments (PediaSuit). During therapy based in PediaSuit protocol therapy suits were used to stimulate proprioception, muscle contraction, and postural stability.Traction bands were placed on the trunk to stimulate muscle control by stabilizing this area and the antigravity muscles.The ability exercise unit was also used to stimulate postural stability and muscle resistance, according to the functional ability of each child. Neuroevolutionary concept is a problem-solving approach focused on the treatment of functional impairments, postural alignment and movement. Therefore, Neuroevolutionary concept is an individualised approach aimed at improving functionality and, consequently, the quality of life of individuals with neurological deficits.
Participants kept the therapeutic routine (conventional physical therapy).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children with confirmed CZS diagnosis by RT-PCR or presumed by imaging findings (CT or MRI \[or both\]), and according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention criteria
- Children accompanied by the support center where the study was conducted.
You may not qualify if:
- Children who did not undergo assessments after the intervention
- Children those weighing \< 9,600 kg, with uncontrolled seizures, or orthopedic changes (e.g., hip subluxations or dysplasia, severe spasticity combined with joint contractures, and severe scoliosis \[Cobb angle \> 40°\]).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Instituto de Pesquisa Professor Joaquim Amorim Neto
Campina Grande, Paraíba, 58406-115, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2025
First Posted
March 28, 2025
Study Start
January 15, 2018
Primary Completion
May 8, 2018
Study Completion
May 8, 2018
Last Updated
March 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03