KT vs IASTM on Upper Trapezius Myofascial Trigger Points To Compare Effect of KT VS IASTM on Pain Intensity, Pain Pressure Threshold, Cervical Range of Motion and Functional Disability Level.
KINESIOTAPING VERSUS INSTRUMENT ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION ON UPPER TRAPEZIUS MYOFASCIAL TRIGGER POINTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Kinesiotaping (KT) is a Non-invasive Method to Treat Musculoskeletal Disorders. it is Non-invasive, Painless, and Less Time-consuming Than Other Options With Fewer Side Effects. IASTM is a Traditional Chinese Therapy Known as "Guasha". IASTM is a Simple and Practical Technique
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study would answer the following question: Is there a difference in the effects between IASTM and KT on pain intensity level, pain pressure threshold, cervical range of motion (ROM), functional disability level and satisfaction level in subjects with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points? The aims of this study are:
- 1.To investigate the effect of KT and IASTM on pain intensity level in subjects with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points.
- 2.To investigate the effects of KT and IASTM on pain pressure threshold in subjects with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points.
- 3.To investigate the effects of KT and IASTM on cervical range of motion (ROM) in subjects with myofascial trigger points.
- 4.To investigate the effect of KT and IASTM on functional disability level in subjects with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points.
- 5.To investigate the effects of KT and IASTM on satisfaction level in subjects with myofascial trigger points.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2025
CompletedMarch 28, 2025
June 1, 2024
1 month
March 21, 2025
March 26, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
KT vs IASTM on upper trapezius myofascial trigger points
one month
pain intensity level
pain intensity level of neck pain
change at pain intensity level through 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
pain pressure threshold
change at pain pressure threshold through 4 weeks
cervical range of motion
change at cervical range of motion through 4 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
functional disability level
change at functional disability level through 4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
tradional physical therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group received traditional therapy( Instructions, hot backs, Deep transverse friction massage, passive \&self stretch, Neck isometric and Scapular retraction exercises) (three sessions per week for 4 weeks).
Kinesiotaping
EXPERIMENTALThis group received KT in addition to Traditional physical therapy program (two sessions per week for 4 weeks).
IASTM
EXPERIMENTALThis group received IASTM in addition to Traditional physical therapy program (three sessions per week for 4 weeks).
Interventions
Instructions, hot backs, Deep transverse friction massage, passive \&self stretch, Neck isometric and Scapular retraction exercises
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- 1) Fifty subjects with age ranged from 18 to 23 years old (Formen et al., 2014).
- \) From both genders with normal BMI ranges between 18.5:24.9 kg/m2. Had MTrPs of unilateral UT muscle (Shamseldeen et al., 2023).
You may not qualify if:
- \. History of whiplash injury (Emshi et al., 2021). 2. History of head, neck, cervical spine or shoulder surgery (Emshi., et al 2021) 3. History of cervical radiculopathy (Emshi et al., 2021) 4. Patients with malignancy (Shamseldeen et al., 2023). 5. Cervical spine fractures (Shamseldeen et al., 2023). 6. Myelopathy (Shamseldeen et al., 2023). 7. Having undergone physical therapy within the past three months before the study.
- \. Non - rheumatologic diseases as multiple sclerosis, thyroid dysfunction and chronic infection.
- \. Rheumatologic condition as poly-articular osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and advanced cervical spine degenerative diseases.
- \. Presence of skin diseases (Luz Júnior et al., 2015). 11. Pregnancy (Luz Júnior et al., 2015).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinic
Banī Suwayf, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Master's Student Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2025
First Posted
March 28, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
April 1, 2025
Last Updated
March 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-06