RESCUE: European Certification for Second Victim Support
European Certification of Interventions in Support of Second Victims (RESCUE)
1 other identifier
observational
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The "second victim" phenomenon affects healthcare professionals who experience highly stressful events in their daily practice, potentially compromising their well-being and patient safety. Despite the need for structured support interventions, many European institutions lack formal programs to address this issue. The RESCUE project responds to this need, building on the previous work of the ERNST Consortium (COST Action 19113). Its objective is to develop and validate two certification systems: one for second victim support interventions and another for training healthcare professionals as peer supporters. A mixed-methods approach will be used, incorporating expert consensus techniques (e.g., Delphi study and consensus conferences) and pilot studies in healthcare institutions across multiple European countries. The study aims to establish European certification standards for second victim support interventions, improving support for healthcare professionals, increasing resilience, and reducing the impact of adverse events on clinical performance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 31, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2025
CompletedSeptember 10, 2025
September 1, 2025
3 months
February 24, 2025
September 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Development of Two Certification Systems for Second Victim Support Interventions and Peer Supporters
The study will assess the successful development and definition of certification standards for second victim support interventions (RESCUE-Interventions) and for healthcare professionals trained as peer supporters (RESCUE-Peer Supporters). The certification standards for second victim support interventions (RESCUE-Interventions) and peer supporters (RESCUE-Peer Supporters) will be developed using expert consensus methodologies, including Delphi studies and consensus conferences. Metric: Successful definition and agreement on certification criteria, with at least 85% consensus among experts in Delphi rounds and consensus meetings.
From study start (January 2025) to certification system finalization (May 2025).
Relevance of the RESCUE Certification System
This measure will assess the perceived relevance of the RESCUE certification system for second victim support interventions and peer supporter training. The evaluation will be conducted through an ad hoc survey completed by healthcare professionals from the institutions participating in the field study. Metric: Percentage of healthcare professionals rating the certification system as "fairly relevant" or "highly relevant" on a 5-point Likert scale, based on responses to the relevant items in the 20-item survey. A minimum of 85% of positive responses ("fairly relevant" or "highly relevant") is required for the certification system to be considered relevant.
From the start of pilot studies (July 2025) to the end of data collection (October 2025).
Feasibility of the RESCUE Certification System
This measure will assess the perceived feasibility of implementing the RESCUE certification system in healthcare institutions. The evaluation will be conducted through an ad hoc survey completed by healthcare professionals from the institutions participating in the field study. Metric: Percentage of healthcare professionals rating the implementation of the certification system as "fairly feasible" or "highly feasible" on a 5-point Likert scale, based on responses to the relevant items in the 20-item survey. A minimum of 85% of positive responses ("fairly feasible" or "highly feasible") is required for the certification system to be considered feasible.
From the start of the pilot studies (July 2025) to the end of data collection (October 2025).
Acceptability of the RESCUE Certification System
This measure will assess the perceived acceptability of the RESCUE certification system among healthcare professionals. The evaluation will be conducted hrough an ad hoc survey completed by staff from the institutions participating in the field study. Metric: Percentage of healthcare professionals rating the certification system as "fairly acceptable" or "highly acceptable" on a 5-point Likert scale, based on responses to the relevant items in the 20-item survey. A minimum of 85% of positive responses ("fairly acceptable" or "highly acceptable") is required for the certification system to be considered acceptable.
From the start of pilot studies (July 2025) to the end of data collection (October 2025).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Perceived Scalability of the RESCUE Certification System in European Healthcare Institutions
From the start of the pilot phase (July 2024) to the end of study (October 2025).
Study Arms (2)
RESCUE-Support Interventions
Healthcare institutions participating in the certification process for structured second victim support interventions.
RESCUE-Peer Supporters
Healthcare professionals receiving certification as peer supporters to assist colleagues experiencing the second victim phenomenon.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consists of healthcare professionals from various disciplines, including physicians, nurses, midwives, clinical managers, patient safety officers, and other professionals involved in patient care and healthcare quality. Participants will be selected from European healthcare institutions implementing second victim support interventions. The study will include experts with at least 5 years of experience in healthcare-related fields, particularly in clinical management, quality assurance, and second victim support programs. The population will be drawn from hospitals, primary care centers, and social care institutions in multiple European countries, including Austria, Belgium, Portugal, and Spain. The study aims to develop and validate certification systems for second victim support interventions and peer supporter training, ensuring that healthcare institutions provide structured and evidence-based emotional support for affected professionals.
You may qualify if:
- Healthcare professionals (e.g., physicians, nurses, midwives, clinical managers, patient safety officers).
- A minimum of 5 years of experience in healthcare-related fields such as clinical management, patient safety, quality assurance, or second victim support interventions.
- Employed in a healthcare institution or involved in second victim support initiatives at the time of the study.
- Willing to participate in peer support training, intervention certification, or evaluation processes related to the RESCUE project.
- Able to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-healthcare professionals or individuals without experience in patient safety, clinical management, or second victim support.
- Less than 5 years of professional experience in relevant fields.
- Not affiliated with a healthcare institution or not involved in second victim support activities.
- Unable to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
FISABIO
San Juan, Alicante, 03110, Spain
Related Publications (9)
Seys D, Panella M, Russotto S, Strametz R, Joaquin Mira J, Van Wilder A, Godderis L, Vanhaecht K. In search of an international multidimensional action plan for second victim support: a narrative review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):816. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09637-8.
PMID: 37525127BACKGROUNDMira JJ, Matarredona V, Tella S, Sousa P, Ribeiro Neves V, Strametz R, Lopez-Pineda A. Unveiling the hidden struggle of healthcare students as second victims through a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05336-y.
PMID: 38589877BACKGROUNDHarkanen M, Pineda AL, Tella S, Mahat S, Panella M, Ratti M, Vanhaecht K, Strametz R, Carrillo I, Rafferty AM, Wu AW, Anttila VJ, Mira JJ. The impact of emotional support on healthcare workers and students coping with COVID-19, and other SARS-CoV pandemics - a mixed-methods systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09744-6.
PMID: 37443003BACKGROUNDGuerra-Paiva S, Lobao MJ, Simoes DG, Fernandes J, Donato H, Carrillo I, Mira JJ, Sousa P. Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 27;13(12):e078118. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078118.
PMID: 38151271BACKGROUNDGuerra-Paiva S, Carrillo I, Mira J, Fernandes J, Strametz R, Gil-Hernandez E, Sousa P. Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach. Int J Public Health. 2024 Aug 30;69:1607428. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39280904BACKGROUNDGil-Hernandez E, Carrillo I, Tumelty ME, Srulovici E, Vanhaecht K, Wallis KA, Giraldo P, Astier-Pena MP, Panella M, Guerra-Paiva S, Buttigieg S, Seys D, Strametz R, Mora AU, Mira JJ. How different countries respond to adverse events whilst patients' rights are protected. Med Sci Law. 2024 Apr;64(2):96-112. doi: 10.1177/00258024231182369. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
PMID: 37365924BACKGROUNDMira J, Carillo I, Tella S, Vanhaecht K, Panella M, Seys D, Ungureanu MI, Sousa P, Buttigieg SC, Vella-Bonanno P, Popovici G, Srulovici E, Guerra-Paiva S, Knezevic B, Lorenzo S, Lachman P, Ushiro S, Scott SD, Wu A, Strametz R. The European Researchers' Network Working on Second Victim (ERNST) Policy Statement on the Second Victim Phenomenon for Increasing Patient Safety. Public Health Rev. 2024 Sep 18;45:1607175. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1607175. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39360222BACKGROUNDCarrillo I, Tella S, Strametz R, Vanhaecht K, Panella M, Guerra-Paiva S, et al. Studies on the second victim phenomenon and other related topics in the pan-European environment: The experience of ERNST Consortium members. J Patient Saf Risk Manag. 2022;27(2):59-65. doi: 10.1177/25160435221076985
BACKGROUNDMira JJ, Potura E, Schroder K, Panella M, Sousa P, Knezevic B, Tella S, Strametz R; RESCUE. Standardizing second victim support: development of the RESCUE certification framework for health care institutions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Nov 27;25(1):1539. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13741-2.
PMID: 41310735DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2025
First Posted
March 21, 2025
Study Start
July 31, 2025
Primary Completion
October 31, 2025
Study Completion
October 31, 2025
Last Updated
September 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Supporting information may be available after study completion and publication of primary results, expected in Q1 2026
- Access Criteria
- Documents will be shared upon request with researchers affiliated with academic or healthcare institutions, subject to ethical approval and compliance with data protection regulations.
Researchers affiliated with academic or healthcare institutions may request access to the dataset by submitting a formal request to the principal investigator. Approval will be granted based on ethical guidelines and compliance with data protection regulations.