Use of Vibration Anesthesia Device in Intratympanic Injections
Evaluation of Different Anesthesia Methods to Reduce Pain From Intratympanic Injections: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
SUMMARY Intratympanic injections commonly cause pain in the patients. Intratympanic steroid injection (ITS) application can be performed by direct injection without anesthesia or with local anesthesia induced by lidocaine spray, lidocaine injection, topical phenol, pantocaine, EMLA cream (lidocaine+prilocaine) or vibration anesthesia device (VAD). The advantage of VAD application over other anesthetic agents was that it eliminated the need to use local anesthetics that may disrupt wound healing. In addition, inducing anesthesia with VAD can be considered as an alternative method in patients allergic to drugs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 25, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2025
CompletedMarch 20, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.1 years
December 23, 2024
March 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). the visual analog scale (VAS) scaled between 0-10,were used.
56 weeks
Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale(NRS-11)
Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11). the numerical rating scale (NRS) scaled between 0-10 were used.
56 weeks
Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale(VRS-4)
Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale (VRS-4). the verbal rating scale (VRS) scaled between 0-4 were used.
56 weeks
Study Arms (4)
1.group
EXPERIMENTALPrior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient. After each ITS, pain assessment was performed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scales (NRS), and Verbal Rating Scales (VRS)
2.group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
3.group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
4.group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPrior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Interventions
In conclusion, induction of anesthesia with VAD in patients treated with ITS provided pain palliation in a similar way to other local anesthetic techniques. Moreover, the advantage of VAD application over other anesthetic agents was that it eliminated the need to use local anesthetics that may disrupt wound healing. In addition, inducing anesthesia with VAD can be considered as an alternative method in patients allergic to drugs. Our study will shed light on different techniques such as the application of ventilation tube in anesthesia with VAD.
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-70 years with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss
You may not qualify if:
- History of otologic surgery,
- Recent ototoxic drug use,
- Congenital inner ear malformation,
- History of chemoradiotherapy due to malignant neoplasia,
- Presence of acute or chronic otitis media,
- Age under 18 years, over 70 years
- History of local anesthesia allergy,
- Coagulation abnormality,
- Pregnant and lactating women,
- Hearing cases with other neurootological diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
van yuzuncu yil university, Bardakçı, Yüzüncü Yıl Ünv., 65080 Tuşba/Van
Van, 65000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MEDİCAL DOCTOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2024
First Posted
March 20, 2025
Study Start
July 25, 2020
Primary Completion
August 25, 2021
Study Completion
December 25, 2021
Last Updated
March 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03