NCT06885723

Brief Summary

SUMMARY Intratympanic injections commonly cause pain in the patients. Intratympanic steroid injection (ITS) application can be performed by direct injection without anesthesia or with local anesthesia induced by lidocaine spray, lidocaine injection, topical phenol, pantocaine, EMLA cream (lidocaine+prilocaine) or vibration anesthesia device (VAD). The advantage of VAD application over other anesthetic agents was that it eliminated the need to use local anesthetics that may disrupt wound healing. In addition, inducing anesthesia with VAD can be considered as an alternative method in patients allergic to drugs.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 25, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 25, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 25, 2021

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 23, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 20, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

December 23, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

sensorineural hearing lossVADintratympanic steroidpainSudden hearing loss

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). the visual analog scale (VAS) scaled between 0-10,were used.

    56 weeks

  • Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale(NRS-11)

    Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11). the numerical rating scale (NRS) scaled between 0-10 were used.

    56 weeks

  • Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale(VRS-4)

    Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale (VRS-4). the verbal rating scale (VRS) scaled between 0-4 were used.

    56 weeks

Study Arms (4)

1.group

EXPERIMENTAL

Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient. After each ITS, pain assessment was performed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scales (NRS), and Verbal Rating Scales (VRS)

Device: Vibration Anesthesia Device (VAD)

2.group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.

Drug: local anesthetic cream

3.group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.

Drug: lidocaine spray

4.group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.

Other: saline drops

Interventions

In conclusion, induction of anesthesia with VAD in patients treated with ITS provided pain palliation in a similar way to other local anesthetic techniques. Moreover, the advantage of VAD application over other anesthetic agents was that it eliminated the need to use local anesthetics that may disrupt wound healing. In addition, inducing anesthesia with VAD can be considered as an alternative method in patients allergic to drugs. Our study will shed light on different techniques such as the application of ventilation tube in anesthesia with VAD.

1.group

Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.

2.group

Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.

3.group

Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.

4.group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18-70 years with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

You may not qualify if:

  • History of otologic surgery,
  • Recent ototoxic drug use,
  • Congenital inner ear malformation,
  • History of chemoradiotherapy due to malignant neoplasia,
  • Presence of acute or chronic otitis media,
  • Age under 18 years, over 70 years
  • History of local anesthesia allergy,
  • Coagulation abnormality,
  • Pregnant and lactating women,
  • Hearing cases with other neurootological diseases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

van yuzuncu yil university, Bardakçı, Yüzüncü Yıl Ünv., 65080 Tuşba/Van

Van, 65000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss, SuddenHearing Loss, SensorineuralPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing LossHearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Prior to each intratimpanik steroid injection (ITS), all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient. The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/). For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient. After each ITS, pain assessment was performed using Visual Analogue Scale , Numerical Rating Scales, and Verbal Rating Scales
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MEDİCAL DOCTOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2024

First Posted

March 20, 2025

Study Start

July 25, 2020

Primary Completion

August 25, 2021

Study Completion

December 25, 2021

Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations