Ischemic Compression Technique Versus Jones Technique in Cervicogenic Headache Patients
Comparative Effects of Jones and Ischemic Compression Technique on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to determine the effects of Jones and Ischemic compression technique on pain, range of motion and disability in patients with cervicogenic headache. Cervicogenic headache is a distinctive type of secondary headache where the pain originates from structures in the neck or cervical spine and radiates to the head. Trigger point release has been associated with decrease in symptoms of patients with cervicogenic headache. This study will be a randomized clinical trial with the sample size of 32 patients. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: Group A and Group B. The setting of the study will be Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur. Group A will receive Jones technique of trigger points of the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscle while Group B will receive ischemic compression of the trigger points of the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscle. Patients of both groups will receive two treatment sessions per week for 6 weeks. Both groups will receive hot pack for 10 minutes, TENS for 15 minutes and strengthening exercises for deep neck flexors (chin tuck and head raise with ten repetitions of 10-second duration, with a 10-second rest interval between each contraction) as baseline treatment protocol. NPRS, HDI and FRT will be used as outcome measure tools. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 with the p-value of \<0.05 taken as significant difference.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2025
CompletedMarch 13, 2025
March 1, 2025
8 months
March 10, 2025
March 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
It is a standardized self-reporting scale consisting of a horizontal line used to estimate the subjective level of pain intensity. It is a 11 point numerical scale, corresponding to the degree of pain. 0= no pain, 1-2-3 = mild pain, 4-5-6 = moderate pain, 7-8-9-10 = severe pain. The patients will be asked to select from that 11 points numerical continuum the number that corresponds to their perceived pain intensity
6 weeks
Headache Disability index (HDI)
This scale is intended to help discover impact of headache. It contains 27 questions in total. First two questions are about frequency of headache and remaining 25 regarding impact of headache on daily life of the person. Each question has three possible answers. "yes " will score 4 points, " sometimes" will score 2 and "no" will give 0 score. A total score of 10 - 28 is regarded as an indicator of light disability, the score of 30-48 represents moderate disability, 50-68 expresses severe disability, and 72 or above marks complete disability
6 weeks
Flexion Rotation test (FRT)
Flexion rotation test is used to measure cervical range of motion employing a goniometer. Impairment in upper cervical spine mobility is associated with cervicogenic headache severity and disability. Measures of such mobility include the flexion-rotation test (FRT), which requires full cervical flexion and may be influenced by lower cervical spine dysfunction.
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group-A (Jones technique)
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive Jones technique for the Sternocleidomastoid and upper fibers of Trapezius.
Group-B (Ischemic compression therapy)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive Ischemic compression for the Sternocleidomastoid and upper fibers of Trapezius
Interventions
In the Jones technique, pressure will be applied on the tender point and the patient's head will be flexed laterally to the side of the tender point, followed by a shoulder abduction of approximately 90 degrees. This position will be held for 90 s and then patient position will be passively returned to the initial position. This will be repeated three times in each session. Patients will receive two treatment sessions per week for 6 weeks
Patients will receive ischemic compression of the trigger points of the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscle with hold time varying between 30 seconds to 1 minute repeated 3 to 5 times in each session. Patients will receive two treatment sessions per week for 6 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both males and females
- years of age
- Individuals satisfying the Cervicogenic Headache criteria
- Positive Simon's criteria for trigger points
You may not qualify if:
- primary headaches (i.e., migraine, tension type headache)
- bilateral headache
- Presence of any red flags
- cervical spinal stenosis
- evidence of central nervous system involvement
- prior surgery to the head or neck
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bahaval Victoria Hospital
Bahawalpur, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Related Publications (5)
Page P. Cervicogenic headaches: an evidence-led approach to clinical management. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Sep;6(3):254-66.
PMID: 22034615BACKGROUNDKnackstedt H, Bansevicius D, Aaseth K, Grande RB, Lundqvist C, Russell MB. Cervicogenic headache in the general population: the Akershus study of chronic headache. Cephalalgia. 2010 Dec;30(12):1468-76. doi: 10.1177/0333102410368442. Epub 2010 May 19.
PMID: 20974607BACKGROUNDBogduk N, Govind J. Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Oct;8(10):959-68. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70209-1.
PMID: 19747657BACKGROUNDGarcia JD, Arnold S, Tetley K, Voight K, Frank RA. Mobilization and Manipulation of the Cervical Spine in Patients with Cervicogenic Headache: Any Scientific Evidence? Front Neurol. 2016 Mar 21;7:40. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00040. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27047446BACKGROUNDOlesen J. International Classification of Headache Disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018 May;17(5):396-397. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30085-1. Epub 2018 Mar 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 29550365BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ghulam Fatima, PHD*
Riphah International University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2025
First Posted
March 13, 2025
Study Start
January 2, 2025
Primary Completion
September 2, 2025
Study Completion
September 15, 2025
Last Updated
March 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share