Investigating the Combined Effects of Intermittent Hypoxia and Exercise on Cognitive and Cerebral Function in Middle-Aged Adults
HYPOX-AGE
Towards a Better Understanding of the Combination of Intermittent Hypoxia and Physical Exercise: Comparison of Effects on Cognitive and Cerebral Capacities in Middle-Aged Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
176
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study investigates whether intermittent hypoxia (IH) and physical activity (PA), either alone or in combination (simultaneously or sequentially), can improve cognitive function and brain health in middle-aged adults (50-65 years old). The hypothesis is that (1) each intervention alone (IHT or PA) provides cognitive benefits and (2) combining IHT with PA may yield additive or synergistic effects, particularly when administered simultaneously rather than sequentially. By comparing these distinct interventions, the study aims to determine which approach best preserves or enhances cognitive performance in middle-aged adults. Findings from this research may inform non-pharmacological strategies to promote healthy aging and reduce the risk of age-related cognitive decline.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
March 13, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.5 years
February 25, 2025
March 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Cognitive Function: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
1-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) * Score Range: 0 to 30 * Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
Baseline (Week 0),Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Cerebral Oxygenation - Tissue Saturation Index (TSI)
* Method: Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) * Measure: Tissue Saturation Index (TSI), expressed as a percentage (%) * Interpretation: Higher TSI values indicate better cerebral oxygenation, reflecting efficient oxygen delivery and utilization in brain tissue.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Biomarker Analysis- Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Levels
* Method: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) * Unit of Measure: pg/mL * Interpretation: Higher BDNF levels indicate greater neuroplasticity, neuronal survival, and cognitive function support.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Cerebral blood flow
Method: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) Measures: Mean, systolic, and diastolic blood flow velocities in cerebral arteries. Interpretation: Higher flow velocities indicate increased cerebral perfusion, while reduced velocities may reflect impaired blood flow regulation or vascular resistance.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Cognitive Function: Stroop Test
The Stroop Test is a widely used cognitive assessment tool designed to measure executive function, specifically selective attention, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control. It evaluates the ability to suppress automatic responses and manage conflicting information. -Score Range: Reaction Time (measured in milliseconds, ms): Represents the time taken to respond in each condition. Accuracy Percentage (%): Indicates the proportion of correct responses relative to total trials. -Interpretation: Lower reaction times indicate faster cognitive processing and improved efficiency in managing conflicting information. Higher accuracy percentages reflect better cognitive control, attentional capacity, and inhibitory function. Performance in the incongruent condition is of particular interest, as it requires greater cognitive effort and executive control.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Cognitive Function: N-Back
The N-Back Test is a cognitive task designed to assess working memory, attention, and cognitive flexibility. It requires participants to continuously monitor a sequence of stimuli (e.g., letters, numbers, or shapes) and determine whether the current stimulus matches one presented N steps earlier in the sequence. The task increases in difficulty as N increases, demanding greater mental effort to update and maintain information in working memory. -Score Range: Accuracy Percentage (%): Proportion of correct responses over total trials. Reaction Time (ms): Time taken to respond to correct matches. -Interpretation: Higher accuracy reflects better working memory capacity and attentional control. Faster reaction times indicate efficient cognitive processing. Performance decline in higher N levels suggests increased cognitive load and reduced working memory capacity. Deficits in accuracy or reaction time may indicate difficulties in executive function and attentional flexibility.
Baseline (Week 0),Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Cognitive Function:Operation Span Test Task
The Operation Span (O-Span) Test is a cognitive task designed to assess working memory capacity and attentional control. It requires participants to simultaneously process and store information, challenging their ability to maintain and manipulate information while handling a secondary task. The test includes: Two training trials for familiarization. Six experimental trials, with letter sequences ranging from four to six letters. -Score Range: Absolute Span Score: 0 to 12 (number of correctly recalled letter sequences). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater working memory capacity and better attentional control. Lower scores may suggest difficulties in managing cognitive load and maintaining task-relevant information under distraction. Performance reflects the ability to simultaneously process and store information, which is critical for complex cognitive tasks such as reasoning, problem-solving, and multitasking.
Baseline (Week 0),Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Cognitive Function: The Trail Making Test
The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a widely used neuropsychological assessment designed to evaluate processing speed, cognitive flexibility, attention, and executive functioning. It consists of two parts: * TMT-A: Measures visual scanning, processing speed, and motor function. Participants connect numbers in ascending order (e.g., 1 → 2 → 3) as quickly as possible. * TMT-B: Assesses cognitive flexibility and task-switching ability. Participants alternate between numbers and letters in sequential order (e.g., 1 → A → 2 → B → 3 → C). * Score Range: Outcome Measure: Time (in seconds) taken to complete each part. Higher scores (longer times) indicate slower processing speed and reduced cognitive flexibility. -Interpretation: Lower scores (faster completion time) indicate better processing speed, visual attention, and cognitive flexibility. Higher scores (longer completion time) may reflect impairments in executive function, attention, or visuomotor speed.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Cerebral Oxygenation - Oxyhemoglobin (O₂Hb)
* Method: Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) * Measure: Oxyhemoglobin (O₂Hb), expressed in micromolar concentration (µM) * Interpretation: Higher O₂Hb levels indicate greater oxygen availability and delivery to brain tissues.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Cerebral Oxygenation - Deoxyhemoglobin (HHb)
* Method: Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) * Measure: Deoxyhemoglobin (HHb), expressed in micromolar concentration (µM) * Interpretation: Elevated HHb levels may suggest reduced oxygen extraction or utilization, potentially indicating impaired cerebral oxygenation.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Cerebral Oxygenation - Total Hemoglobin (tHb)
* Method: Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) * Measure: Total Hemoglobin (tHb), expressed in micromolar concentration (µM) * Interpretation: Higher tHb values reflect greater blood volume in cerebral tissue, which may indicate increased cerebral perfusion.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Biomarker Analysis-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Levels
* Method: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) * Unit of Measure: pg/mL * Interpretation: Increased VEGF levels suggest enhanced angiogenesis, vascular function, and cerebral blood flow.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Biomarker Analysis -Irisin Levels
* Method: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) * Unit of Measure: ng/mL * Interpretation: Higher irisin levels indicate improved metabolic regulation, muscle-derived neuroprotection, and brain function.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Biomarker Analysis-Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Alpha (HIF-1α) Pathway Activation
* Method: Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) / Western Blot * Unit of Measure: Relative expression level (fold change compared to baseline) * Interpretation: Increased HIF-1α activation suggests enhanced cellular adaptation to hypoxia, improved metabolic regulation, and potential neuroprotection.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 1 (after 3 sessions), Week 6 (post-intervention, after session 18)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Autonomy and Daily Functioning (Activities of Daily Living Scale)
Baseline, and post-intervention (week 6, session 18)
Study Arms (5)
Intermittent Hypoxia Only
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undergo a protocol of repeated cycles of hypoxia and normoxia. Each session will consist of alternating 5-minute hypoxic exposures with 5-minute normoxic intervals, for a total of approximately 30 minutes per session. Sessions will be held three times per week for six weeks (18 total sessions), and will be conducted at rest inside a hypoxic chamber under clinical supervision.
Physical exercise only
EXPERIMENTALParticipants allocated to this arm will engage in a moderate-intensity aerobic exercise program (\~60-70% of age-predicted maximum heart rate and based on a standardized scale of perceived exertion) three times per week for six weeks (total of 18 sessions). Each session will last approximately 30 minutes and may involve activities such as treadmill walking, cycling, or other forms of continuous aerobic exercise. The exercise intensity is monitored (e.g., via heart rate or perceived exertion) to ensure a moderate level of effort that is both safe and beneficial for overall cardiovascular and cognitive health.
Sequential Combination of Intermittent Hypoxia (IH) and Physical Activity (PA)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undergo both Intermittent Hypoxia Training (IH) and Physical Activity (PA) within the same session, but in a sequential manner. The order of interventions (IH first or PA first) will be randomized to account for potential order effects. Each session consists of 30 minutes of IHT (5-minute hypoxia cycles, followed by 5-minute normoxic intervals, with SpO₂ maintained between 80% and 90%) and 30 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (e.g., treadmill walking, cycling). Sessions will be held three times per week for six weeks (18 total sessions) and will be conducted under clinical supervision in a controlled environment.
Simultaneous Combination of Intermittent Hypoxia (IH) and Physical Activity (PA)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undergo Intermittent Hypoxia (IH) and Physical Activity (PA) simultaneously within the same session. During each session, participants will engage in moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (e.g., treadmill walking or cycling) while being exposed to IH. The total session duration will be 30 minutes, consisting of repeated cycles of 5 minutes of hypoxia followed by 5 minutes of normoxia, with SpO₂ maintained between 80% and 90% during hypoxic intervals. Sessions will be conducted three times per week for six weeks (18 total sessions) under clinical supervision in a controlled environment.
Sham (Placebo) Intermittent Hypoxia
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will undergo a sham (placebo) version of Intermittent Hypoxia (IH), where they will be exposed to normoxic air (FiO₂ \~20.9%) instead of actual hypoxia. The session structure will mimic the IH protocol, alternating between 5-minute "hypoxia" periods and 5-minute normoxia periods for a total of 30 minutes per session, but without a real reduction in oxygen levels. Sessions will be held three times per week for six weeks (18 total sessions) and will be conducted at rest inside a hypoxic chamber under clinical supervision.
Interventions
Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise (\~60-70% of maximum heart rate) and Intermittent Hypoxia (maintained between 80-90% during hypoxic phases)
Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise (\~60-70% of maximum heart rate)
Exposure to normoxic air (FiO₂ \~20.9%) instead of actual hypoxia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 50 to 65 years (male and female)
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 24
- No participation in any structured exercise intervention in the last 6 months
- No exposure to altitudes above 1,500 m in the preceding 3 months
- No chronic kidney, cardiovascular, metabolic, neurological, or orthopedic -disease
- No history of significant respiratory conditions (e.g., asthma, exercise-induced -bronchospasm, dyspnea on exertion)
- No current immunosuppressive treatment (e.g., corticosteroids, antidepressants)
- No history of cancer or arthritis treatments
- No recent blood donation (within the last 2 months)
- Must be covered by a Social Security system or equivalent
- Signed informed consent after receiving clear and transparent study information
You may not qualify if:
- Active smoking
- Major cardiovascular complications within the last 3 months (e.g., myocardial i-infarction, unstable angina, severe arrhythmias)
- Severe hypertension (≥180 mmHg systolic or ≥110 mmHg diastolic)
- Chronic respiratory insufficiency (e.g., COPD, sleep apnea)
- Diabetes mellitus
- Need for continuous or intermittent oxygen therapy
- Participation in another clinical study at the same time
- Use of corticosteroids or other systemic immunosuppressants
- Any condition compromising safety or study compliance, as determined by the medical team
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Legal or administrative protections (e.g., individuals under guardianship, persons deprived of liberty)
- High baseline physical activity levels (PASE score \>90 indicating moderate-to-intense physical activity)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ayoub Boulareslead
- University of Poitierscollaborator
- Laboratory MOVE, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Poitiers, Francecollaborator
Related Publications (3)
Schega L, Peter B, Brigadski T, Lessmann V, Isermann B, Hamacher D, Torpel A. Effect of intermittent normobaric hypoxia on aerobic capacity and cognitive function in older people. J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Nov;19(11):941-945. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
PMID: 27134133BACKGROUNDBoulares A, Pichon A, Faucher C, Bragazzi NL, Dupuy O. Effects of Intermittent Hypoxia Protocols on Cognitive Performance and Brain Health in Older Adults Across Cognitive States: A Systematic Literature Review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101(1):13-30. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240711.
PMID: 39093075BACKGROUNDSchega L, Peter B, Torpel A, Mutschler H, Isermann B, Hamacher D. Effects of intermittent hypoxia on cognitive performance and quality of life in elderly adults: a pilot study. Gerontology. 2013;59(4):316-23. doi: 10.1159/000350927. Epub 2013 May 3.
PMID: 23652274BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, PhD student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2025
First Posted
March 13, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
March 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share