NCT06872528

Brief Summary

The results of combining infiltrative analgesia applied by orthopedists with epidural analgesia applied by anesthesiologists after knee replacement surgery will be compared. It aims to compare epidural analgesia with the maximum reduction of postoperative pain in patients, as well as in terms of both analgesic and complications. The study will include patients who have undergone knee replacement surgery for six months. In the study, we will compare the results of painkillers applied to the patient from the waist or knee after the waist numbing anesthesia, which includes some of the routinely applied protocols of your knee replacement surgery. It is a condition that will be monitored after surgery. The study aims to reduce maximum pain with two painkiller methods applied in small amounts or together. No interventional application will be made to the patient who will undergo surgery other than routine application. After the surgery, you will be asked verbally about your pain level and side effects at certain hours after the surgery and the amount of painkillers used and the amount of painkillers will be determined according to the follow-up hours (1st, 2nd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 48th hours after the surgery). In addition to these, complications will also be monitored. The results of patients who can be fully followed up at the end of 6 months will be presented as a scientific study.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2025

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2025

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 28, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 28, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 28, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

February 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

RanawatEpidural analgesiaKnee replacement surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Amount of local anesthetic used for epidural analgesia

    Is there a statistical difference between the two groups? Monitoring the effect of local infiltration on the amount of epidural analgesic agent

    6 months

  • Differences between the two groups in terms of complications and need for additional analgesia

    The effect of epidural analgesia and infiltration analgesia on complications and additional analgesia needs in patients

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Analgesia provided only with epidural analgesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Recording the amount of medication and the number of complications according to observational follow-up

Analgesia provided with epidural analgesia and local infiltration

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Recording the amount of medication and the number of complications according to observational follow-up

Interventions

Observational monitoring of patients and recording data for 24 hours

Analgesia provided only with epidural analgesiaAnalgesia provided with epidural analgesia and local infiltration

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age range 18-75
  • Those who underwent surgery with combined spinal anesthesia
  • Drugs administered with combined spinal anesthesia and intra-articular infiltration analgesia

You may not qualify if:

  • Those who do not want to participate in the study
  • Those who underwent surgery under general anesthesia
  • Patients outside the specified age range
  • Patients with inadequate follow-up results (patient, drug and device related)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Berninger MT, Friederichs J, Leidinger W, Augat P, Buhren V, Fulghum C, Reng W. Effect of local infiltration analgesia, peripheral nerve blocks, general and spinal anesthesia on early functional recovery and pain control in total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 18;19(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2154-z.

    PMID: 30021587BACKGROUND
  • Liu X, Zhang H, Zhang H, Guo M, Gao Y, Du C. Local infiltration vs epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control after total knee or hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 30;99(44):e22674. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022674.

    PMID: 33126306BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2025

First Posted

March 12, 2025

Study Start

March 28, 2025

Primary Completion

September 28, 2025

Study Completion

September 28, 2025

Last Updated

March 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03