Chart Review: Comparing the Position and Tilt of Dental Implants Versus Those of Natural Teeth
Axial Inclination of Mandibular Molar Dental Implants Versus Natural Teeth: What Are the Differences?
1 other identifier
observational
400
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: When placing a dental implant, it is not always possible to place it exactly in the same position as the tooth that it replaced. That might be because of how the gums and mouth are shaped, since some bone is always lost after a tooth is extracted. Researchers want to study the records of people who have had dental implants. They want to check to see how much difference there is between how the implant is positioned and how the same tooth on the other side is positioned. They also want to compare how the implant is positioned compared to the tooth it replaced, when that is possible in the dental record. Study design: This study will not enroll any participants. The researchers will search the database of patient records at the study clinic to find people who have had dental implants of a single molar tooth. Then they will look at them to find records that include good images that they can use to compare the implant and tooth positions. Researchers will then analyze the findings and write a review article.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2027
January 23, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.2 years
March 6, 2025
January 21, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Replaced Tooth Comparison
Difference in buccolingual and mesiodistal angulations of placed implant compared with pre-extraction natural tooth.
Baseline (prior to tooth extraction), day 1 of implant placement, day 1 of crown placement (4-6 months after implant placement)
Contralateral Tooth Comparison
Difference in buccolingual and mesiodistal angulations of placed implant compared with contralateral natural molar.
Day 1 of implant placement, day 1 of crown placement (4-6 months after implant placement)
Other Outcomes (2)
Frequency of Fenestration/Dehiscence
Day 1 of crown placement (4-6 months post-implant placement)
Distance from Foramen Mentale
Day 1 of crown placement (4-6 months post-implant placement)
Study Arms (1)
Chart Review
Existing records of patients at the Ohio State University College of Dentistry who had a dental implant of one single molar tooth between January 1, 2016 and January 6, 2025
Interventions
On existing identified chart records: measurements on CBCT and panographic radiographs.
Eligibility Criteria
Existing records of patients at the Ohio State University College of Dentistry who have had a dental implant of one single molar tooth, between January 1, 2016 and January 6, 2025
You may qualify if:
- Patients with mandibular molar implant placement.
- Presence of contralateral natural mandibular first, second molars or both.
- Availability of pre-extraction CBCT scans of the corresponding or contralateral mandibular molar tooth or panoramic radiographs for mesiodistal angulation.
- Availability of post-implant CBCT scans or panoramic radiographs for mesiodistal angulation
You may not qualify if:
- Incomplete or low-quality CBCT scans.
- History of mandibular trauma or pathologies altering tooth or implant alignment.
- History of reconstructive mandibular surgery in the implant region.
- History of periapical pathology
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Binnaz Leblebicioglu, DDS, MMS, PhD
Ohio State University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2025
First Posted
March 12, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share