PMRA and Shapley-Based Machine Learning for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Central Subregions of Clinically Node-Negative Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: a Prospective Multicenter Validation and Development of a Web Calculator
PMRA
1 other identifier
observational
4,882
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background:Management of clinically node-negative(cN0) papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is complicated by high occult lymph node metastasis (LNM) rates. We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for central LNM using machine learning (ML) and traditional nomograms through Probability-based Ranking Model Approach (PMRA). Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study involving 4,882 patients across 3 hospitals (2016-2023). After applying inclusion criteria, 1,953 patients from the primary center were allocated to model train and test (7:3 ratio). External validation included prospective cohorts of 286 and 176 patients from two independent centers.13 ML algorithms and traditional nomogram models were systematically evaluated using PMRA.We compared models using preoperative features alone versus those incorporating both preoperative and intraoperative frozen section pathology data. Feature selection utilized six methods, with L1-based selection proving optimal for most predictions.Model interpretability was enhanced through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) visualization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2025
CompletedMarch 12, 2025
February 1, 2025
8 years
February 21, 2025
March 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Predictors were analyzed after the data of 1953 patients were included in the training set and internal validation (at a ratio of 7:3), and the predictors were analyzed in 286 patients and 176 patients, respectively, in two external validation centers.
2016-2023
Study Arms (1)
After applying inclusion criteria, 1,953 patients from the primary center were allocated to model tr
After applying inclusion criteria, 1,953 patients from the primary center were allocated to model train and test (7:3 ratio). External validation included prospective cohorts of 286 and 176 patients from two independent centers.13 ML algorithms and traditional nomogram models were systematically evaluated using PMRA.We compared models using preoperative features alone versus those incorporating both preoperative and intraoperative frozen section pathology data. Feature selection utilized six methods, with L1-based selection proving optimal for most predictions.Model interpretability was enhanced through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) visualization.
Interventions
PMRA and Shapley-Based Machine Learning for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Central Subregions of Clinically Node-Negative Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Prospective Multicenter Validation and Development of a Web Calculator
Eligibility Criteria
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 4,882 cases from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Hospital A) between 2016 and 2020, collecting clinical, ultrasound, and intraoperative frozen pathology data. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1,953 patients were selected for model development and internal validation (split in a 7:3 ratio). For prospective external validation, patients from two additional centers were included: 286 cases from Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Hospital B) and 176 cases from The People's Hospital of Yubei District of Chongqing (Hospital C), designated as external validation sets 1 and 2, respectively.
You may qualify if:
- First-time thyroid cancer surgery patients
- cN0-PTMC patients diagnosed through fine-needle aspiration and imaging.
You may not qualify if:
- Secondary surgery
- Other pathological types of thyroid cancer
- Incomplete clinical data
- Distant metastasis or history of cervical radiation exposure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
1 Friendship Road, Yuzhong District Chongqing
Chongqing, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Year
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2025
First Posted
March 12, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
March 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The main reasons are as follows: IPD contains personal sensitive information, and sharing it may infringe on privacy and violate data protection regulations (such as GDPR). Sharing IPD may pose risks of data leakage or misuse, especially when it is not adequately anonymized. The use of data is subject to legal or contractual constraints and cannot be shared without permission. IPD may involve intellectual property rights or business secrets, and sharing it may affect the rights of data owners. Sharing IPD may violate the informed consent of research participants and trigger ethical disputes. The lack of background information may lead to incorrect interpretation or misuse of the data. The process of data preparation, anonymization, and sharing is time-consuming and labor-intensive, adding additional burdens. Therefore, IPD sharing should be done with caution and usually requires strict review and protection by agreement.