NCT06871956

Brief Summary

Background:Management of clinically node-negative(cN0) papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is complicated by high occult lymph node metastasis (LNM) rates. We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for central LNM using machine learning (ML) and traditional nomograms through Probability-based Ranking Model Approach (PMRA). Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study involving 4,882 patients across 3 hospitals (2016-2023). After applying inclusion criteria, 1,953 patients from the primary center were allocated to model train and test (7:3 ratio). External validation included prospective cohorts of 286 and 176 patients from two independent centers.13 ML algorithms and traditional nomogram models were systematically evaluated using PMRA.We compared models using preoperative features alone versus those incorporating both preoperative and intraoperative frozen section pathology data. Feature selection utilized six methods, with L1-based selection proving optimal for most predictions.Model interpretability was enhanced through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) visualization.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4,882

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 21, 2025

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 years

First QC Date

February 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 6, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Predictors were analyzed after the data of 1953 patients were included in the training set and internal validation (at a ratio of 7:3), and the predictors were analyzed in 286 patients and 176 patients, respectively, in two external validation centers.

    2016-2023

Study Arms (1)

After applying inclusion criteria, 1,953 patients from the primary center were allocated to model tr

After applying inclusion criteria, 1,953 patients from the primary center were allocated to model train and test (7:3 ratio). External validation included prospective cohorts of 286 and 176 patients from two independent centers.13 ML algorithms and traditional nomogram models were systematically evaluated using PMRA.We compared models using preoperative features alone versus those incorporating both preoperative and intraoperative frozen section pathology data. Feature selection utilized six methods, with L1-based selection proving optimal for most predictions.Model interpretability was enhanced through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) visualization.

Diagnostic Test: PMRA and Shapley-Based Machine Learning for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Central Subregions of Clinically Node-Negative Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Interventions

PMRA and Shapley-Based Machine Learning for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Central Subregions of Clinically Node-Negative Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Prospective Multicenter Validation and Development of a Web Calculator

After applying inclusion criteria, 1,953 patients from the primary center were allocated to model tr

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 4,882 cases from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Hospital A) between 2016 and 2020, collecting clinical, ultrasound, and intraoperative frozen pathology data. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1,953 patients were selected for model development and internal validation (split in a 7:3 ratio). For prospective external validation, patients from two additional centers were included: 286 cases from Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Hospital B) and 176 cases from The People's Hospital of Yubei District of Chongqing (Hospital C), designated as external validation sets 1 and 2, respectively.

You may qualify if:

  • First-time thyroid cancer surgery patients
  • cN0-PTMC patients diagnosed through fine-needle aspiration and imaging.

You may not qualify if:

  • Secondary surgery
  • Other pathological types of thyroid cancer
  • Incomplete clinical data
  • Distant metastasis or history of cervical radiation exposure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

1 Friendship Road, Yuzhong District Chongqing

Chongqing, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2025

First Posted

March 12, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

March 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The main reasons are as follows: IPD contains personal sensitive information, and sharing it may infringe on privacy and violate data protection regulations (such as GDPR). Sharing IPD may pose risks of data leakage or misuse, especially when it is not adequately anonymized. The use of data is subject to legal or contractual constraints and cannot be shared without permission. IPD may involve intellectual property rights or business secrets, and sharing it may affect the rights of data owners. Sharing IPD may violate the informed consent of research participants and trigger ethical disputes. The lack of background information may lead to incorrect interpretation or misuse of the data. The process of data preparation, anonymization, and sharing is time-consuming and labor-intensive, adding additional burdens. Therefore, IPD sharing should be done with caution and usually requires strict review and protection by agreement.

Locations