NCT06870708

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the functional results of patients who underwent two different arthroscopic methods for the management of articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PT-RCTs). The present study aims to compare the functional results following the repair of PT-RCTs using the conversion versus the trastendon techniques

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2022

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 11, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

March 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Partial thickness rotator cuff tear; Transtendon technique; conversion technique.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score

    shoulder score, the maximum is 100, the minimum is zero, a higher score means a better outcome

    baseline, and 18 months after surgery

  • Constant and Murley score

    shoulder score, the maximum is 100, the minimum is zero, a higher score means a better outcome

    baseline, and 18 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual analogue scale

    baseline, and 18 months after surgery

Study Arms (2)

The Conversion repair technique: Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

arthroscopic repair of partial rotator cuff tear using the conversion technique

Procedure: arthroscopic repair of partial rotator cuff tear using the conversion versus the transtendon technique

The Transtendon repair technique: Group B

EXPERIMENTAL

arthroscopic repair of partial rotator cuff tear using the transtendon technique

Procedure: arthroscopic repair of partial rotator cuff tear using the conversion versus the transtendon technique

Interventions

arthroscopic repair of partial rotator cuff tear using the conversion versus the transtendon technique

The Conversion repair technique: Group AThe Transtendon repair technique: Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age49 Years - 63 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients suffering symptomatic PT-RCTs exceeding 50% of the tendon thickness, documented by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and confirmed by arthroscopy intraoperative.
  • Failure of nonoperative management for at least 3 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior shoulder surgery.
  • Severe concomitant pathologies including glenohumeral arthritis, advanced subscapularis tear, and biceps tendon rupture.
  • Associated Bankart lesion.
  • Patients with uncontrolled Diabetes mellites.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

Giza, Cairo Governorate, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Yang Y, Hu D, Chen S, Guan S, Shang X. Transtendon technique versus repair after completion of the tear for articular-sided partial rotator cuff tear: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 May 22;18(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03831-4.

    PMID: 37217901BACKGROUND
  • Thamrongskulsiri N, Limskul D, Itthipanichpong T, Tanpowpong T, Kuptniratsaikul S. Similar outcomes between transtendon repair and tear completion repair techniques for partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4575-4584. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07502-z. Epub 2023 Jul 15.

    PMID: 37452830BACKGROUND
  • Sun L, Zhang Q, Ge H, Sun Y, Cheng B. Which is the best repair of articular-sided rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 May 28;10:84. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0224-6.

    PMID: 26016477BACKGROUND
  • Shin SJ. A comparison of 2 repair techniques for partial-thickness articular-sided rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

    PMID: 22000411BACKGROUND
  • Castagna A, Borroni M, Garofalo R, Rose GD, Cesari E, Padua R, Conti M, Gumina S. Deep partial rotator cuff tear: transtendon repair or tear completion and repair? A randomized clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Feb;23(2):460-3. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2536-6. Epub 2013 May 21.

    PMID: 23689964BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • mohamed H khalil, M.D

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: prospective comparative study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2025

First Posted

March 11, 2025

Study Start

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

March 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations