NCT06869759

Brief Summary

Breast cancer is the second most prevalent cancer among Nepali females, accounting for 17.1% of cases and 7.7% of female cancer-related deaths. It is more common in younger, premenopausal women, often diagnosed at advanced stages. Raising awareness through community education is crucial for promoting breast cancer screening, particularly in low-resource settings like Nepal, where clinical breast exams are essential early detection tools. Integrating breast cancer education into the health system can enhance knowledge, encourage screening, and promote healthy behaviors for prevention. Early detection significantly improves treatment outcomes and survival rates. In remote areas, limited access to advanced detection technologies makes breast self-examination (BSE) the most feasible and cost-effective method, particularly in Jumla. This study evaluates the effectiveness of community health worker-led breast cancer prevention through health promotion and education strategies. It follows PROCTOR's framework and the Health Belief Model (HBM) A mixed-methods design will be employed, incorporating an embedded implementation science approach, a cluster-randomized trial, and mixed-method research. The study population includes married women of Jumla, female community health volunteers (FCHVs), and auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs). Exclusion criteria include married women ≥20 years old with existing cases of cancer, pregnant or lactating women, FCHVs unable to acquire BSE skills, and untrained ANMs. The sample consists of 90 participants in both intervention and control groups. Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) tool. SOP-based checklists will evaluate fidelity, while FGDs and KIIs will collect qualitative data. Quantitative data will be analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. A paired t-test and mixed-effect linear regression will assess effectiveness, while qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis. Findings will be reported per CONSORT guidelines. Ethical approval will be obtained from the Nepal Health Research Council. Expected outcomes include improved breast cancer knowledge, perception, and screening intention, leading to early detection and reduced prevalence. However, selection bias in cluster trials may limit generalizability.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 25, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 8, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 11, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 25, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 25, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

January 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Health Promotion and Education Strategies

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • The implementation outcome will be measured by: Acceptability (attitude and perception of women toward BSE and satisfaction levels of the individuals who perform BSE).

    Acceptability (attitude and perception of women toward BSE and satisfaction levels of the individuals who perform BSE). The following indicators will measure this: participants' attitudes toward BSE, perception scores measured in the mean score and SD, and the percentage of women satisfied with BSE practices.

    From date of randomization, baseline data collection within 2 weeks, and endline 2 months after intervention

  • Adoption

    Adoption will be measured by the percentage of CHW and FCHVs willing to adopt BSE. It will also be measured by the extent to which FCHVs are eager and able to integrate BSE activities into their existing roles and responsibilities.

    From date of randomization, baseline data collection within 2 weeks, and endline 2 months after intervention

  • Appropriateness

    Appropriateness will be measured using indicators of the extent to which CNMP is suitably suited to the cultural, social, and economic context and aligned with the needs and preferences of the target population.

    From date of randomization, baseline data collection within 2 weeks, and endline 2 months after intervention

  • Feasibility of implementing FCHV induced breast-self examination

    Feasibility will be measured by assessing the practicality and ease of implementing FCHV in CNMP, quantified through the percentage of health facilities equipped with necessary resources, including training materials and equipment, as well as the proportion of FCHV implementation strategies successfully adopted

    From date of randomization, baseline data collection within 2 weeks, and endline 2 months after intervention

  • Fidelity

    Fidelity will be measured by evaluating the extent to which FCHVs and HFs adhere to the prescribed guidelines and protocols for BSE screening and referral, monitoring the consistency of FCHV discussed in the HMG meeting across different communities, and evaluating the extent to which women adhere to the prescribed guidelines for BSE.

    From date of randomization, baseline data collection within 2 weeks, and endline 2 months after intervention

  • Effectiveness

    Effectiveness outcomes will be measured using the following indicators: Perception, attitude, knowledge, coverage of BSE screening, and Follow-up rates for positive cases.

    From date of randomization, baseline data collection within 2 weeks, and endline 2 months after intervention

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Arm Description: Clusters will be based on the municipality's wards, to measure the effectiveness of implementation outcomes. There are nine wards in the study site, three of which will be selected for intervention group. Thirty samples will be obtained from each randomly selected cluster of intervention.

Behavioral: Implementation strategy - Health Promotion and Education-based intervention

Control Arm

NO INTERVENTION

Arm Description: Thirty samples will be obtained from each randomly selected cluster of control group who would not be given any intervention, this group consist of 90 participants. The usual work done by the health system of Nepal (i.e: PEN package); after the end line, will also capacitate the control group by radio jingle after seven month of intervention. A mass campaign will be conducted on the process and importance of BSE by airing a radio jingle on local FM.

Interventions

Firstly, three broad strategies will be implemented in the intervention arm (use of advisory boards, sensitization, and linkage to care). The advisory board meetings will be held every month to discuss the progress and receive their feedback. Secondly, orientation and capacity building will be done by onsite coaching to community health workers at the health facility level on BSE. Those trained health workers will frequently capacitate FCHVs during monthly meetings. Then, FCHV will visit the community to be aware of BSE as well as they will be involved in a stigma reduction campaign. Sensitization to FCHVs through orientation and capacity building by providing 3 batch training to selected 3 wards, then FCHVs aware and practice the skills of BSE to the recruited participants during home visit and Thirdly, the suspected and identified cases will be linked by strengthening the referral mechanism of the health system and CHWs reminders for follow-up to cases.

Intervention Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsIn the quantitative study design, participants will be married women and health facilities. For the qualitative study, the population will be married women of CNMP Jumla. Similarly, community health workers FCHV and CHW will participate in the study.
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Married women \>= 20 years of age group women of CNMP Jumla,
  • FCHV, those who can read, write, and understand, and
  • ANM

You may not qualify if:

  • Married women \>= 20 years age group women who had a positive existing case,
  • Pregnant and lactating women of CNMP Jumla,
  • FCHV those who cannot acquire the minimum skill of breast self-examination,
  • ANM who untrained for BSE.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Karnali Academy of Health Sciences, Jumla, Karnali, Nepal

Jumla, Karnali, Nepal

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Bharat Kafle

    Karnali Academy of Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Fellowship

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2025

First Posted

March 11, 2025

Study Start

August 25, 2024

Primary Completion

August 25, 2025

Study Completion

September 25, 2025

Last Updated

March 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations