NCT06865963

Brief Summary

According to recent nomenclature, vulvodynia is vulvar pain without a clear identifiable cause persisting for at least 3-months and distinguished from vulvar pain caused by a specific disorder (inflammatory, neoplastic, traumatic). Vulvodynia can be provoked (when the pain is felt after touching the area), or unprovoked (pain is constant). Localized provoked vulvodynia of the vestibule, known as vestibulodynia (VBD), is the most common manifestation of the disease (about 80%). Data collected suggests that up to 16% of women, particularly sexually active reproductive-aged women, suffers from this condition. Despite affecting almost 1 out of 8 women of all ages, vulvodynia remains completely unacknowledged to the most. These data highlight that VBD cannot be considered a rare disease, but it rather is a high frequency women's health condition, albeit neglected and hard to diagnose because of a lack of obvious markers. Despite the paucity of molecular data, studies about pathogenesis of VBD have highlighted several risk factors including inflammation, recurrent vulvovaginal infections and microbiota dysfunction, mucosal nerve fiber proliferation, hormonal alterations, pelvic floor muscle dysfunction, central pain mechanisms, and genetic factors. A recent study has highlighted that, compared to healthy controls, women with VBD demonstrated differences primarily in vaginal (but not plasma) concentrations of metabolites of the sphingolipid signaling pathways, suggesting localized effects in vagina and vulvar vestibule rather than systemic effects. The current prevalent theory on the etiology of VBD is that during or after an initial and persistent vulvovaginal insult (infection, microtrauma, allergic reaction), a "susceptible" individual is then unable to successfully clear the inflammation process that alters and sensitizes the neural tissue in the vestibular area, resulting in localized allodynia and hyperalgesia. The under-diagnosis of VBD is the result of different factors including practical, cultural, sociological and psychological ones. The women with VBD confirmed that healthcare provider knowledge and attitudes as well as system challenges (specialist and allied healthcare provider availability) are major barriers to timely diagnosis, mainly due to lack of diagnostic tests. For instance, many patients do not seek treatment due to feelings of inadequacy, invalidation, isolation or guilt. This attitude also has a cultural background that is rooted in shame, in the endurance of pain, in embarrassment and resulting silence of patients, dismissal of vulvar pain as a "psychological disorder" by clinicians have resulted in widespread ignorance about this disabling condition. Finally, one of the most important, and doubtlessly the easiest one to solve, is the lack of either molecular or cellular markers of the disease itself. Unfortunately the VBD diagnosis always comes too late, when the mechanism of aberrant immune response already has caused the irreversible nervous sprouting in the vulvar vestibule and the chronicization of the symptoms has already happened. This delayed diagnosis increases the women's risk for sexual dysfunction and diminishes their quality of life. The VBD diagnosis is generally a diagnosis of exclusion, where basically all other possible differential diagnoses have been excluded and this is what is "left over". Many markers of inflammation were investigated without significant results, likely because the method employed in the study was focused on few pre-selected targets and an unbiased analysis has not been performed, yet. For all these reasons, the search for suitable diagnostic markers of VBD remains a high but unmet research priority. In the NGS era the absence of genomic study of VBD is despicable. RNA-sequencing of vestibule vaginae (vestibular) cell swab is a pain-free method that we already tested and could allow the identification of diagnostic markers of VBD for the development and the optimization of a reliable and quantifiable diagnostic test. In this context we plan to perform transcriptomic analysis integrated with the state-of-the-art single cell omic analysis on VBD patients and healthy controls to unbiasedly identify specific VBD markers. Moreover, considering the different pathogenesis and the range of symptoms and severity of the disease, with these markers we also aim at stratifying different groups of VBD. This stratification will lay the foundation for further studies to move patients towards a real personalized medicine. This analysis has never been performed on VBD patients with this global approach and at such high resolution. The results of our project will help the clinicians in VBD diagnosis, in therapy direction and in the earlier identification of patients with higher risk to develop chronic VBD, thus helping to build a preventive strategy to avoid the progression and chronicization of the symptoms

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
1mo left

Started Jun 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress93%
Jun 2024Jun 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 25, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 10, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 25, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 25, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 10, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 1, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 6, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Molecular marker: mRNA

    identification of molecular markers, either at the mRNA expression, that can distinguish VBD patients from healthy controls and also distinguish different types of VBD patients

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Molecular marker: protein

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

Patients who receive diagnosis of vestibulodynia

Genetic: vulvar biopsy and blood semples

patients without vulvar pain

Genetic: vulvar biopsy and blood semples

Interventions

Collection of different types of specimen from VBD patients and healthy controls: mRNA, protein, cells, blood

Patients who receive diagnosis of vestibulodyniapatients without vulvar pain

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients who receive diagnosis of vestibulodynia.

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 50
  • abstinence from intercourse for 7 days prior to the visit
  • non-use of intravaginal products for 7 days prior to the visit

You may not qualify if:

  • patients whit generalized vulvodynia and those with only spontaneous, but not provoked vestibulodynia
  • Endometriosis
  • Pregnancy
  • Infectious vulvar disease
  • Post-menopause
  • Feeding time
  • gave birth within 4 months
  • received systemic or vaginal antimicrobial or probiotic therapy within 1 month before the visit

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, SC Ostetricia e Ginecologia 1

Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy

RECRUITING

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

mRNA, protein, cells, blood

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vulvodynia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vulvar DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2025

First Posted

March 10, 2025

Study Start

June 25, 2024

Primary Completion

June 25, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 25, 2026

Last Updated

March 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

at the end of the study

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL

Locations