Impact of Catheter Ablation of Frequent Premature Ventricular Complexes in Treating Subtle Left Cardiomyopathy
Efficacy of Catheter Ablation of Frequent Asymptomatic Idiopathic Premature Ventricular Complexes in Treating Latent Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction As Being Assessed by Speckle Tracking of LV Global Longitudinal Strain
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Throughout the past decade, there were no straightforward recommendations regarding the management of asymptomatic high-burden Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) in structurally normal heart extending from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines of management of ventricular arrhythmias in 2014, passing by the American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and Heart Rhythm Association (HRA) guidelines 2017, and reaching to the recent ESC guidelines in 2022 that declared overtly that there is a gap of evidence regarding management of asymptomatic high burden PVCs in structurally normal heart. The goal of this clinical trial is to know if other imaging modalities rather than the conventional Two-dimension (2D) echocardiography can guide the treatment strategy of high-burden idiopathic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). In our clinical trial, we used 2D speckle tracking of left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) as an indicator for subtle LV systolic dysfunction in patients with structurally normal heart by conventional echocardiography. The main questions the trial aims to answer are:
- Is radiofrequency catheter ablation an effective method in the treatment of early subtle myocardial dysfunction in patients with normal left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and internal dimensions guided by 2D STE of GLS before progression into overt LV systolic dysfunction?
- Is there a correlation between radiofrequency catheter ablation of asymptomatic frequent idiopathic PVCs and improvement of patient functional capacity as an indicator for subconscious adaptation?
- Is there a correlation between PVC burden and the degree of impairment of GLS? Researchers will compare group A (control group) and group B (ablation group) to see if there is a significant difference between them regarding global longitudinal strain. Participants will be randomized into two groups each containing 20 patients. Group A (Control group): will be subjected to the standard of care being regular follow-up of symptom status and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) Group B (ablation group): will be scheduled for PVC ablation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 23, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2025
CompletedMarch 7, 2025
January 1, 2025
12 months
February 14, 2025
March 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
global longitudinal strain
change of left ventricular global longitudinal strain was an indicator of the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of subtle LV systolic dysfunction and prevention of further progression into overt cardiomyopathy.
minimum of 3 months after (intervention) radio frequency ablation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
functional capacity
minimum of 3 months after (intervention) radio frequency ablation
PVC burden
minimum of 3 months after (intervention) radio frequency ablation
Study Arms (2)
group A (control arm)
NO INTERVENTIONGroup A is the control arm that will be applied to the standard of care treatment which is follow-up of symptoms status and left ventricular ejection fraction as per the recommendation of ESC guidelines of management of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death published in 2022.
Group B (ablation arm)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B is the ablation arm that will be scheduled for radiofrequency catheter ablation of PVCs.
Interventions
Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is a minimally invasive procedure that targets and eliminates certain types of cardiac arrhythmias. RF became effective as the first-line treatment for ventricular arrhythmias in some circumstances.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Asymptomatic patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs, defined as PVCs burden of ≥ 20% of total beats in Holter ECG monitoring in the structurally normal heart as being assessed by conventional 2D echocardiography and normal 12 lead surface ECG.
- Impaired LV GLS by 2D speckle tracking (GLS \> -16 %).
- Patients willing and capable of providing informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple co-morbidities that may be potential factors affecting functional capacity including anemia, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, bronchial asthma, Cerebrovascular stroke (CVS), skeletomuscular abnormalities or chronic kidney disease (CKD).
- Symptoms including but not limited to fatigue, palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain, dizziness, syncope, presyncope, or functional limitation that was defined as less than the lower limit of predicted 6-minute walk distance (6 MWD).
- Any electrolyte abnormalities, abnormal arterial blood gases, and/or abnormal thyroid profile.
- Ischemic heart disease (ISHD), in our study ISHD was defined as patients with a previous history of Myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, previous revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia including noninvasive functional assessment or coronary angiography showing significant stenosis \> 50%.
- Symptomatic or asymptomatic structural heart disease including any congenital heart diseases, significant valvular lesion defined as primary or secondary valvular lesion causing abnormal loading condition, or more than grade I diastolic dysfunction.
- Any symptomatic or asymptomatic phenotype of cardiomyopathies.
- Polymorphic PVCs.
- Atrial fibrillation.
- Positive family history of sudden cardiac death.
- Heart failure including heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams university hospital
Cairo, Abbasya, +20, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2025
First Posted
March 7, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2023
Primary Completion
May 23, 2024
Study Completion
August 28, 2024
Last Updated
March 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01