IMPRINT VR Trainer Evaluation
IMPRINT Randomized Evaluation
2 other identifiers
observational
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to assess whether the Immersive Modular Preparedness Intelligent Tutor (IMPRINT) virtual reality (VR) training modules provide a measurable benefit in training delivery and trainee engagement. Specifically, the investigators want to see how VR can enhance trainees' comprehension and retention of key HAZWOPER concepts, and how it supports you as trainers in presenting these materials more effectively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 8, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2025
CompletedMarch 6, 2025
March 1, 2025
2 days
February 26, 2025
March 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
System Usability Scale
SUS measures the usability of a system or interface. Higher scores on SUS indicate better usability. Typically, SUS scores are standardized to a scale of 0 to 100, where a score above 68 is considered above average usability, and scores above 80 indicate excellent usability
Immediately after the intervention
NASA TLX
The NASA TLX is a scale from 0 - 100 and measures perceived workload across different domains such as mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. Higher NASA TLX scores indicate higher perceived workload, meaning that a lower score generally suggests a better outcome in terms of reduced workload. However, for this effort, we are specifically assessing whether the workload in VR aligns with the high workload typically experienced during an actual HAZWOPER incident
Immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
User satisfaction with the VR modules
Post Study / after completing all interventions
Study Arms (1)
Trainers
Trainers responsible to teaching the 40-hr HAZWOPER course. They are experts in their field and have the most familiarity with the traditional PowerPoint training
Interventions
Virtual Reality Modules created to simulate HAZWOPER PowerPoint scenarios
Eligibility Criteria
American Indian or Alaskan Native: .01% Asian: 9% Black or African American: 9.9% Hispanic or Latinx: 20.5% Native Hawaiian or other Islander: 0% Multiple Race, Non-Hispanic: 0% White: 56.7%
You may qualify if:
- Students taking the 40-hr HAZWOPER course at The New England Consortium
- Trainers teaching the 40-hr HAZWOPER course at The New England Consortium
You may not qualify if:
- N/A
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Charles River Analyticslead
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)collaborator
- The New England Consortiumcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The New England Consortium
Lowell, Massachusetts, 01854, United States
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2025
First Posted
March 6, 2025
Study Start
October 8, 2024
Primary Completion
October 10, 2024
Study Completion
October 30, 2024
Last Updated
March 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03